With shepherd in hand (thanks, Med), we are kicking off a two-week working
group last call for the TACACS+ secured with TLS 1.3 draft. This draft has
received several reviews, and the authors have addressed all outstanding
comments. That said, I have re-requested reviews from SEC DIR and OPS D
We’re up to WG LC on this draft. We want to reconfirm any known IPR related to
this work:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13/
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft
Grrr, forgot the link for convenience. Please provide WG LC reviews for the
following draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13/
Thanks.
Joe
From: Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Date: Monday, June 24, 2024 at 08:36
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: u...@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG]W
On Jun 24, 2024, at 8:38 AM, Joe Clarke (jclarke)
wrote:
>
> Grrr, forgot the link for convenience. Please provide WG LC reviews for the
> following draft:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13/
I have general concerns about the document, which I've raised be
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-16.txt is now available. It
is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) WG
of the IETF.
Title: Extended TCP Options and IPv6 Extension Headers IPFIX Information
Elements
Authors: Mohamed Boucadair
Hi Michael,
Thank you for addressing Paul’s and Roman’s comments. I will wait for Roman to
confirm whether the changes you have made, mostly deleting the paragraphs that
he put a DISCUSS on, whether he is ok with removing his DISCUSS on the document.
At the same time, looking at the number of d
Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
> Thank you for addressing Paul’s and Roman’s comments. I will wait for
> Roman to confirm whether the changes you have made, mostly deleting the
> paragraphs that he put a DISCUSS on, whether he is ok with removing his
> DISCUSS on the document.
Fantas
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-15: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
