[OPSAWG]Re: Sheperd write-up for for YANG Data Models for Bearers and 'Attachment Circuits'-as-a-Service (ACaaS) (draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit)

2024-05-29 Thread Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Thank you, Luis for the review and for agreeing to act as shepherd. I read through your write-up and this diff. I see you called out the IEEE802.1AX and IEEE802.1AB references, but I do not see that addressed in this diff or discussed here. I don’t like sending up drafts that have identified

[OPSAWG]I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-13.txt

2024-05-29 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-13.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) WG of the IETF. Title: YANG Data Models for Bearers and 'Attachment Circuits'-as-a-Service (ACaaS) Authors: Mohamed Boucadair

[OPSAWG]Re: Sheperd write-up for for YANG Data Models for Bearers and 'Attachment Circuits'-as-a-Service (ACaaS) (draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit)

2024-05-29 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi Joe, Luis, all, I agree with Joe's assessment for these refs. Submitted right now a new version to address the review from Luis. As a bonus, also added another example to show how the model is powerful in covering another deployment case. Cheers, Med De : Joe Clarke (jclarke) Envoyé : mer

[OPSAWG]Re: Sheperd write-up for for YANG Data Models for Bearers and 'Attachment Circuits'-as-a-Service (ACaaS) (draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit)

2024-05-29 Thread Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Thanks, Med. Luis, can you re-review and adjust your shepherd write-up accordingly? Joe From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com Date: Wednesday, May 29, 2024 at 09:21 To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) , LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO , opsawg@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circ...@ietf.org

[OPSAWG]Re: Sheperd write-up for for YANG Data Models for Bearers and 'Attachment Circuits'-as-a-Service (ACaaS) (draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit)

2024-05-29 Thread LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
Hi Joe, Med, I concur that both references are not necessary for understanding or implementing the YANG module, so certainly should be categorized as informative. I will update the write-up in consequence. Best regards Luis PS. Thanks Med for the updates in the draft. De: Joe Clarke (jclarke

[OPSAWG]Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-11

2024-05-29 Thread Joe Clarke via Datatracker
Joe Clarke has requested publication of draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-11 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the OPSAWG working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac/ ___ OPSAW

[OPSAWG]Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit-11

2024-05-29 Thread Joe Clarke via Datatracker
Joe Clarke has requested publication of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit-11 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the OPSAWG working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit/

[OPSAWG]Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-13

2024-05-29 Thread Joe Clarke via Datatracker
Joe Clarke has requested publication of draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-13 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the OPSAWG working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/ __

[OPSAWG]Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue-09

2024-05-29 Thread Joe Clarke via Datatracker
Joe Clarke has requested publication of draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue-09 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the OPSAWG working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue/ ___