Re: [OPSAWG] Proposed Liaison Response to SG11

Adrian Farrel wrote: > The MPLS working group is discussing sending a liaison to ITU-T SG11 in > response to their liaison (https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1869/) > originally targeted at OPSAWG. I'm not an MPLS person, and I don't do ITU-T, but: > If you feel: > - OPSA

Re: [OPSAWG] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw via Datatracker wrote: > -- > DISCUSS: > -- > ** Section 7. > The use of a publicly specified firmware update protocol would a

Re: [OPSAWG] RTGDIR Early Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit

Hi Donald, (adding OPSAWG as it seems the review was not shared on that list) Thanks for the careful review. A diff to track the changes to address your comments can be seen at: https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?doc_1=draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit&url_2=https://boucadair.gith