Re: [OPSAWG] [Add] [dhcwg] 🔔 WG LC: RADIUS Extensions for Encrypted DNS [EXTENDED]

2022-11-21 Thread Bernie Volz
Ok. - Bernie (from iPad) > On Nov 21, 2022, at 2:04 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: > >  > Hi Bernie, > > Thanks for the comment. > > I agree that reference may be confusing for some readers. I went with a less > verbose text by simply replacing the OLD reference with “Section 8.3

[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-add-encrypted-dns-07.txt

2022-11-21 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : RADIUS Extensions for DHCP Configured Services Authors : Mohamed Boucadair

Re: [OPSAWG] Manifest need? Re: draft-claise-opsawg-collected-data-manifest

2022-11-21 Thread IGNACIO DOMINGUEZ MARTINEZ-CASANUEVA
Hi Alex, The purpose of the Data Collection Manifest is to cover all possible MDT mechanisms, not only YANG Push. There are other mechanisms like gNMI, which rely on subscriptions based on YANG path, for which we need the context of the subscription (e.g., on-change, suppress-redundancy). Addit

[OPSAWG] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-09

2022-11-21 Thread Bo Wu via Datatracker
Reviewer: Bo Wu Review result: Has Nits Reviewer: Bo Wu Review result: Has Issues I am the assigned Ops reviewer for this draft. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-09 Summary: This document (with intended statu

Re: [OPSAWG] Manifest need? Re: draft-claise-opsawg-collected-data-manifest

2022-11-21 Thread Alexander Clemm
Thank you for clarifying. Yes, I think it will be good to make this more explicit to the draft (and perhaps hint also to at the alternative option of subscribing to the subscription configuration if it were only YANG-Push (as opposed to other mechanisms) that was being used, to more clearly dif