Re: [OPSAWG] Notes on draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark

2024-04-29 Thread Giuseppe Fioccola
draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark Dear authors, I finally got some time to read the draft. I have the same comment as Greg, Standard track seems more appropriate. Also, I have also read RFC9341 and Alt-Mark can also compute the delay between the ingress interface and the egress interface within

Re: [OPSAWG] Notes on draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark

2024-04-26 Thread Alex Huang Feng
Dear authors, I finally got some time to read the draft. I have the same comment as Greg, Standard track seems more appropriate. Also, I have also read RFC9341 and Alt-Mark can also compute the delay between the ingress interface and the egress interface within a single node (node monitoring).

Re: [OPSAWG] Notes on draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark

2024-04-26 Thread Giuseppe Fioccola
Hi Greg, Thank you for your review and for your opinion of the draft. I fully agree that the intended status must be standards track. I will change it in the next revision. Regards, Giuseppe From: Greg Mirsky Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2024 10:20 AM To: opsawg ; IETF IPPM WG ; draft-gfz-opsawg