We would like to thank the WG (and TEAS) for the reviews and comments during WG
LC. LC has concluded, and comments have been addressed (today) for issues
raised.
We are still pending a couple of shepherd write-ups, but once we get them we
can move these drafts forward to the IESG.
Joe
From:
Hi Joe, all,
AC service model defines the general AC model, covering both Layer2 and Layer3
attributes, and also enhances bearer, profiles and protocols etc..
While RFC 8299 L3SM also defines L3 AC and RFC 8466 L2SM defines L2 AC, I think
a comparison might help to choose the appropriate model
