[OPSAWG]I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-18.txt

2024-11-07 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-18.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) WG of the IETF. Title: YANG Data Models for Bearers and 'Attachment Circuits'-as-a-Service (ACaaS) Authors: Mohamed Boucadair

[OPSAWG]I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-13.txt

2024-11-07 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-13.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) WG of the IETF. Title: A Common YANG Data Model for Attachment Circuits Authors: Mohamed Boucadair Richard Roberts

[OPSAWG]Re: Request for Time Slots for IETF-121 OPSAWG Session

2024-11-07 Thread Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Hi OPSAWG, As I presented in the OPSAWG session yesterday, I would like to standardize the following two drafts about Intent-Based Security Management Automation for Cloud-Based Security Services: - Slides: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/121/materials/slides-121-opsawg-intent-based-security-m

[OPSAWG]Re: TACACS+ TLS Resumption and PSK.

2024-11-07 Thread Alan DeKok
On Nov 6, 2024, at 11:00 PM, heasley wrote: >> >> Perhaps add a note that TACACS+ TLS servers and clients SHOUD NOT use >> well-known CAs. i.e. CAs from the web PKI. Doing so would allow clients to >> connect to any server, and would allow anyone to issue client certs. > > I think that you

[OPSAWG]Re: [DMM] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-11.txt

2024-11-07 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi all, I had a discussion with John and agreed to proceed with the approach discussed in the thread. As no objection was raised on the list, we will implement the PR below in the next iteration of AC specs. ==15/10/24 I exercised that path to see what would be needed to support that. The chan