Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] New project proposal: NFVbench

Date: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 10:18 AM To: 'Don Clarke' , "Frank Brockners (fbrockne)" , 'TSC OPNFV' , 'TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV' Cc: 'Carsten Rossenhoevel' , "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" Subject: RE: [opnfv-tsc] New project proposal: N

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] New project proposal: NFVbench

Hi Yujun, Inline… From: "Yujun Zhang (ZTE)" Date: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 5:56 PM To: "Frank Brockners (fbrockne)" , TSC OPNFV , TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV , test-wg Cc: Carsten Rossenhoevel , "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] New pr

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] On Stress Test Demo//RE: [test-wg] Notes from OPNFV Plugfest meeting - "Testing group Euphrates collaborative work"

Hi Gabriel, Regarding TC1, do you have the results and original chart available somewhere (the chart in the picture and in the slides is kind of small). Do you also have a detailed description of the test: · what kind of packet gen you are running in the first VM and what kind of forwar

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] On Stress Test Demo//RE: [test-wg] Notes from OPNFV Plugfest meeting - "Testing group Euphrates collaborative work"

Hi Gabriel, From: "Yuyang (Gabriel)" Date: Friday, May 5, 2017 at 12:06 AM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , "morgan.richo...@orange.com" , "Cooper, Trevor" , "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" , "test...@lists.opnfv.org" Subject

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Multiple docker containers from one project

+1 for the central file managed by releng with (unfrequent) changes submitted through gerrit (this is similar to how many openstack releng features work). Overall, allowing projects to build more than 1 docker container is a nice addition. With regard to versioning, is there a document describi

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Multiple docker containers from one project

Projects that do not have pyPI packages (or the right version of PyPI package published) might prefer to do a git clone instead and either install it directly or using pip install from the clone in the container. Some Dockerfile may prefer to directly install from the current (cloned) repo (and

[opnfv-tech-discuss] VM image file server in OPNFV?

Hello, I was wondering if there a file server in OPNFV that can be used by OPNFV project owners to store public VM Images (several hundred MBs to 1 GB per image) that can be accessed internally (from OPNFV labs) and from the Internet? OpenStack has a similar server (OpenStack App Catalog). Tha

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] VM image file server in OPNFV?

Exactly what I needed, thanks Fatih! Alec From: Fatih Degirmenci Date: Monday, July 10, 2017 at 9:14 AM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] VM image file server in OPNFV? Hi, We store this type o

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] docker container versioning

versioning scheme Thanks Alec From: Fatih Degirmenci Date: Monday, July 10, 2017 at 9:23 AM To: "Beierl, Mark" , "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Multiple docker containers from one project H

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Multiple docker containers from one project

Inline… From: Jose Lausuch Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 4:27 AM To: Fatih Degirmenci , "Beierl, Mark" , "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Multiple docker containers from one project Hi, We exc

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] docker container versioning

Hi Fatih, From: Fatih Degirmenci Date: Monday, July 10, 2017 at 2:04 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , "Beierl, Mark" Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" , "test...@lists.opnfv.org" Subject: Re: [test-wg] docker container versioning Hi Alec, Y

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfvdocs] OPNFV doc workflow for E release

Hi Sofia, Can you provide a quick status on the documentation workflow for the E release. Is it same as D release or was that changed? I’m asking in the context of a new project which already has a lot of readthedoc-ready content and was wondering how to cutover to the OPNFV doc. Thanks Al

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] docker container versioning

ere/how the conversation started. We can then try to generalize it later on. /Fatih On 11 Jul 2017, at 17:16, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: Can we work on a proposal and get every project that deals with containers involved? __

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] docker container versioning

conversation started. > > We can then try to generalize it later on. > > /Fatih > > On 11 Jul 2017, at 17:16, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: > > Can we work on a proposal and get every project that deals w

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] docker container versioning

rg/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting) /Morgan On 12/07/2017 17:43, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: > Morgan, > > Unfortunately, I won’t be able to attend next week (on PTO). > Can this be squeezed into tomorrow’s meeting (July 13)? We

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] docker container versioning

the agenda: - decision on where to host the docker build scripts (common one or project´s repo?). It has been proposed but not decided. Thanks, Jose > On 12 Jul 2017, at 20:10, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: > > July/August is tricky with PTO

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] docker container versioning

opic to be discussed but maybe it is better to wait until everyone is back from PTO as it will be difficult to align without the participation of the people who are really involved. - Jose - > On 13 Jul 2017, at 17:00, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV Docker builds on Dockerhub account

I second the concerns of Fatih with risk of having to manage 2 paths for building containers if the dockerhup automated build cannot fully satisfy our requirements. Before we make a decision I’d like to suggest that we first iron out our requirements, then it will be easier to make a decision.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV Docker builds on Dockerhub account

discussion. We can use that same wiki page or use a different one. Thanks Alec From: "Beierl, Mark" Date: Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 9:19 AM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" Cc: Fatih Degirmenci , Jose Lausuch , "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" , test-wg Su

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Topics for Weekly Technical Discussion

We need to look at the impact on versioning since the docker container tag reflects the release (e.g. euphrates-5.0.0), since this proposal prepends an arch field (x86-euphrates-5.0.0 ?). How many OPNFV containers will have to support more arch than just x86? I was under the impression that most

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [infra] Proposal for LaaS Hardware

Few comments: • Would it be possible to distinguish between NICs and ports? When I see “2 NICs” or “4 NICs” I suppose these are 10G ports? • I’d recommend using DPDK compliant NICs everywhere, best is to use NICs that are known to work well with DPDK (e.g. Intel X710 NIC has 4x

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Topics for Weekly Technical Discussion

middle of my Thursday commute. Thanks Alec From: "HU, BIN" Date: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 5:00 PM To: "Beierl, Mark" , "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Topics for Weekly T

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Topics for Weekly Technical Discussion

TRex on ARM… From what I can see, to run data plane performance test with TRex on ARM pod will require an x86 server until Trex is validated on ARM. Thanks Alec From: "Beierl, Mark" Date: Thursday, August 17, 2017 at 6:21 AM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" Cc: "opnfv-tec

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV] 2 questions on OPNFV docker repo

Few comments on this * To Fatih’s point (also developed in the thread [1]) and t repeat myself, we need to converge on the issue of container versioning first before deciding on which toolchain to use (internal Jenkins build or dockerhub build server). From what I can see dockerhub builds

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Topics for Weekly Technical Discussion

: Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 2:37 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , "Beierl, Mark" Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" , "HU, BIN" , Raymond Paik Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Topics for Weekly Technical Discussion Hi Alec … VSPERF does not currently

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Topics for Weekly Technical Discussion

given pod), we should distinguish pod installer requirements from OPNFV test framework installation requirements. They don’t have to be the same. Regards, Alec From: Alexandru Avadanii Date: Sunday, September 10, 2017 at 9:12 AM To: Julien , "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , "

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] stable branch window

Fatih mentioned that changes in F would be in a different repo after the reorganization of the releng repo – so branching releng would technically not be needed for Euphrates? In any case, it does not hurt to tag (I was surprised tags were not used more often in OPNFV repos to mark internal ver

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Topics for Weekly Technical Discussion

Hi Alex From: Alexandru Avadanii Date: Sunday, September 10, 2017 at 3:40 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , Julien , "Cooper, Trevor" , "Beierl, Mark" , Bob Monkman , Shai Tsur Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] stable branch window

, Alec From: Cedric OLLIVIER Date: Monday, September 11, 2017 at 1:38 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" Cc: "Beierl, Mark" , Alexandru Avadanii , opnfv-project-leads , "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" , Fatih Degirmenci Subject: Re: [opnfv-proj

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] stable branch window

Hi Cedric, Inline… From: Cedric OLLIVIER Date: Monday, September 11, 2017 at 10:31 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" Cc: "Beierl, Mark" , Alexandru Avadanii , opnfv-project-leads , "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" , Fatih Degirmenci Subject: Re: [opnfv-proj

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] stable branch window

David, That might look obvious but perhaps you could confirm the exact branch name moving forward (or perhaps this has not changed). From the look of existing branches, looks like it will be “stable/euphrates” I assume projects can/will commit stuff on that branch until some code freeze milesto

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] stable branch window

a “Euphrates” prefix ;-) Alec From: "Beierl, Mark" Date: Friday, September 15, 2017 at 12:04 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" Cc: David McBride , "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" , opnfv-project-leads , Tapio Tallgren , Raymond Paik , Trevor Br

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] stable branch window

trouble ;-) I will keep Frank in the loop of course. Thanks for writing that wiki page. Regards, Alec From: David McBride Date: Friday, September 15, 2017 at 12:04 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV , opnfv-project-leads , Aric Gardner , Raymond Paik

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] rc tagging

The current proposal https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Git+Tagging+Instructions+for+Euphrates uses the following name for release candidates tags: for 5.0: euphrates.1.rc1 euphrates.1.rc2 … euphrates.5.0 for 5.1: euphrates.2.rc1 euphrates.2.rc2 … euphrates.5.1 This works but is a bit surprisi

[opnfv-tech-discuss] urgent euphrates git tags vote needed

I would like to get a quick vote from any person that works directly or indirectly with code in OPNFV Please reply with -1, 0 +1 For using prefixed git tags for the Euphrates release: “opnfv-5.0.0” This is a slight change to the plan on record (which was to use “5.0.0”). This does NOT impact

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Many failed docker builds

This all ties into the versioning of artifacts since you can’t have concurrent builds of the same repo (for example from 2 distinct gerrit triggers on different patchsets) without proper tagging of the artifacts (you can’t just tag them with “latest”) I think it would make sense to allow only

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] urgent euphrates git tags vote needed

Yujun Zhang (ZTE)" Date: Monday, September 25, 2017 at 5:55 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] urgent euphrates git tags vote needed I had a quick look at the wiki page and try to understand the rat

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF][NFVBENCH] streamlining the jump host to data plane wiring

Hi Trevor and team, I’d like to get some feedback regarding the way jump hosts are wired to the data plane as that will have a direct impact on how software based traffic gen like TRex is configured on the jump host. My impression is that the wiring of traffic gen devices to the data plane has

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] urgent euphrates git tags vote needed

: Jose Lausuch Date: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 12:17 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Cc: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" , Raymond Paik Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] urgent euphrates git tags vote needed +1 What about usi

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] urgent euphrates git tags vote needed

if the container tag syntax for multi-arch is set in stone for Euphrates (copy Mark/David). Thanks Alec From: Alexandru Avadanii Date: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 1:07 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Subject: RE: [opnfv-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF][NFVBENCH] streamlining the jump host to data plane wiring

PM To: "Cooper, Trevor" , "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF][NFVBENCH] streamlining the jump host to data plane wiring I would second the point raised here. We went through a similar th

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF][NFVBENCH] streamlining the jump host to data plane wiring

Date: Friday, September 29, 2017 at 10:07 AM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , Wenjing Chu , "Cooper, Trevor" , "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Cc: Jack Morgan Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF][NFVBENCH] streamlining the jump host to data plan

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Euphrates release tagging preparation

This email is mostly addressed for all OPNFV project PTLs that participate in the Euphrates release – there should be bout 30-40 projects involved. A branch called “stable/euphrates” was created on your repo about 3 weeks ago. Before euphrates releases (by Oct 20), there needs to be 1 git tag app

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Euphrates release DOC preparation

I would like to bring your attention on one discussion happening in the functest DOC gerrit review and that concerns every project that participates to euphrates. The question is should each project doc mention exactly which version of artifact to use (in case of functest it will be the exact d

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release] improving branch process

Is there a program for the plugfest, like what happens which day? I only see few topics on email or etherpads (for the test wg) with no information about the date. Can someone provide an overview of the typical plugfest agenda? If I can attend, I may not be able to stay the whole week (likely at

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] [release][euphrates] release next week - Oct 20, 2017

We will need to rebuild all Docker containers with the proper tag at MS11. This will require fixing the releng/opnfv-docker.sh script as it currently names tags using the old format (“euphrates.1..0”) Alec From: on behalf of David McBride Date: Thursday, October 12, 2017 at 11:41 AM To:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Arch-specific Docker tags

I would prefer limiting the number of container images because we’re going to have a lot more image versions for some projects (to tackle versioned XCI/CD) So option 2 does not look great for me. I’d vote for option 1. Have you guys looked at support for multi-arch docker images? I find it reall

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] Alpine for arch

Alex: this looks like a good plan and seems to take care of all functest requirements wrt build. What we need to nail down next is the versioning and how it plays out with Functest CI, Functest XCI and lastly to the release. It is critical to nail down the versioning and branching model first

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] How to merge master to euphrates with gerrit

I have many commits in master which I’d like to merge to stable/euphrates. Would like to check if anybody knows how to merge master into a release branch using gerrit? Looks like I may need the permission to upload merges with Gerrit. Here is what I did: $ git fetch origin stable/euphrates:euph

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] How to merge master to euphrates with gerrit

model works out with CI and XCI. Thanks Alec From: Trevor Bramwell Date: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 at 3:04 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] How to merge master to euphrates w

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] How to merge master to euphrates with gerrit

and clean way – but requires push merge commit permission in gerrit. If all else is not possible I’ll sync using your method + squashing all commits. Thanks Alec From: "Brattain, Ross B" Date: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 at 3:06 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" ,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] How to merge master to euphrates with gerrit

Alex, Ross has proposed a method using rebase, is that what you are also proposing? It is still not quite same as a merge (see my reply to Ross). Thanks Alec From: Alexandru Avadanii Date: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 at 4:20 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , Trevor Bramwell

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] How to merge master to euphrates with gerrit

. But we should allow merge commits to be allowed on gerrit reviews (they are not enabled today). Regards, Alec From: "Yujun Zhang (ZTE)" Date: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 at 7:23 PM To: Trevor Bramwell , "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@list

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] How to merge master to euphrates with gerrit

will be inevitable to prevent multiplication of identical commits across branches. Regards, Alec From: Cedric OLLIVIER Date: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 at 11:09 PM To: "Yujun Zhang (ZTE)" Cc: Trevor Bramwell , "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , "opnfv-tech-discuss@l

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] How to merge master to euphrates with gerrit

the stable branch. There might be a generally conceived idea that a master branch is usually not stable, but that is not necessarily the case for every project. Thanks Alec From: "Yujun Zhang (ZTE)" Date: Friday, October 20, 2017 at 12:50 AM To: "Alec Hothan (aho

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] MS11 - tag repos

David, NFVbench is done. Who is triggering the corresponding container builds and when? Regards, Alec From: on behalf of David McBride Date: Friday, October 20, 2017 at 10:52 AM To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV , opnfv-project-leads Subjec

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] MS11 - tag repos

releng will need to trigger these container builds for all the projects that have containers. Regards, Alec From: David McBride Date: Friday, October 20, 2017 at 3:46 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV , opnfv-project-leads , Raymond Paik , "tim.irn.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] MS11 - tag repos

Talk: bw...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:bw...@linuxfoundation.org> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 7:40 AM, David McBride mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: +Randy Alec, I think that Randy Levensalor would be a good person to talk with to get an end-user perspective. David On Mon, Oct 2

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] MS11 - tag repos

Georg Kunz , "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" Cc: opnfv-project-leads , opnfv-tech-discuss Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] MS11 - tag repos Hello Alec, Our Functest containers are not built by releng (we are still waiting for updates). I have configu

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [infra][releng] proposal for RELENG project to take ownership of docker build resources

+1 From: on behalf of David McBride Date: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 at 2:56 PM To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV Cc: "infra...@lists.opnfv.org" , test-wg Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [infra][releng] proposal for RELENG project to take ownership of docker build resources please +1, 0, or -1 to indic

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][fraser] MS2 - Test case documentation in the test case database - Nov 17

David, It might not be clear for every team but I suppose this is only for those projects that have test cases in Functest and does not apply to other projects (such as other test projects)? It is hard to follow what milestones apply to what projects – looks like there are at least 2 groups of

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Time for the Testperf Meeting & Cancel the Next Meeting

Looks like there is a confusion.., Note that US west coast is now in PST since a couple of weeks. My calendar shows the weekly test wg meeting at 8AM - with no indication of DST (as sent by Trevor) I went to the meeting this morning but could not find anybody and was wondering if this week was t

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Regarding the Testperf meeting this week

I also have some questions on the scope and goal of this initiative – most specifically targeted at the data plane. Is there more information about how vsperf would be used in that setup? It would be great to have a meeting on it at the plugfest next week. Thanks Alec From: on behalf of

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [opnfvdocs] Agenda for tomorrow's meeting

Just a note to say that 6am is not exactly a friendly time for west coast/PST and almost all OPNFV meetings are very heavily clustered around 6/7am. But I know it is hard to find a slot that works for Asia/America and Europe - hopefully, there are not that many PTL on that timezone. In case I

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [opnfvdocs] Agenda for tomorrow's meeting

From: Georg Kunz Date: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 at 5:12 AM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , David McBride , Sofia Wallin Cc: opnfv-project-leads , "TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV (opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org)" Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [o

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng] Need a way to create/delete OPNFV project containers in DockerHub

The only docker images that can be built today by project committers through CI are: * images off tip of master with docker tag “latest” * images off tip of stable branches with docker tag “stable” Currently, there is no way for a project committer to build and push to DockerHub conta

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [opnfvdocs] Agenda for tomorrow's meeting

Great link! Thanks, Alec From: Georg Kunz Date: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 at 1:24 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , David McBride , Sofia Wallin Cc: opnfv-project-leads , "TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV (opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org)" Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss]

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 20 Dec 2017 (ww50)

" Cc: "'ALFRED C 'MORTON (AL)''" , 'Trevor Cooper' , "'Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)'" , 'Cian Ferriter' , "Martin Klozik (martinx.klo...@intel.com)" , "Christian Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com)&q

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [nfvbench] - AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'rstrip'

Hi Peter, This looks to be a problem with the openstack authentication (openrc file) while trying to list a neutron network: networks = self.neutron.list_networks(name=network_name) In EXT chain mode, the code will attempt to retrieve the characteristics of the right and left external netw

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [nfvbench] - AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'rstrip'

contribute there, I’d be happy to guide you and point you to what needs to change. Regards, Alec From: "Balint, Peter (Nokia - HU/Budapest)" Date: Friday, January 12, 2018 at 12:11 AM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Su

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [nfvbench] - AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'rstrip'

all this makes sense, if you see any issue, send the config file used, a description of what your chain does and how it is configured, run your cli with –debug and send the full output. Thanks Alec From: "Balint, Peter (Nokia - HU/Budapest)" Date: Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 10:5

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 17 Jan 2018 (ww52)

7;Trevor Cooper' , "'Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)'" , 'Cian Ferriter' , "Martin Klozik (martinx.klo...@intel.com)" , "Christian Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com)" , "Bill Michalowski (bmich...@redhat.com)" , "'Eli

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Agenda for VSPERF weekly meeting - 24 Jan 2018 (ww53)

uot;'ALFRED C 'MORTON (AL)''" , 'Trevor Cooper' , "'Mars Toktonaliev (Nokia - US/Irving)'" , 'Cian Ferriter' , "Martin Klozik (martinx.klo...@intel.com)" , "Christian Trautman (ctrau...@redhat.com)" , "Bill Michalows

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [nfvbench] testpmd

Peter, This is outdated information. With the latest versions of NFVbench, the testpmd VM image is included in the docker container itself (that way we make sure NFVbench always uses the right version of the VM image). May I ask why you want to access this VM image? To use it you will need to

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [nfvbench] testpmd

Nokia - HU/Budapest)" Date: Sunday, February 11, 2018 at 11:06 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [nfvbench] testpmd Hi Alec, Thank you for information, I would like to add an L3 loop VM (this woul

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [nfvbench] testpmd

Hi Peter, From: "Balint, Peter (Nokia - HU/Budapest)" Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 6:28 AM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [nfvbench] testpmd Hi Alec, thank you for information. I

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [nfvbench] testpmd

switch_port: pci: "03:00.0" - port: 1 switch_port: pci: "03:00.1" intf_speed: 25Gbps vlan_tagging: false no_arp: true I should dest_mac: FA:16:3E:2B:B0:D1 (DUT int 1) src_mac: 24:8a:07:8e:d3:14 (tester int 1) dest_ma

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [nfvbench] testpmd

: "Balint, Peter (Nokia - HU/Budapest)" Date: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 at 12:49 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [nfvbench] testpmd Hi Alec, I tried but I get this error: [root@dc ~]# sudo doc

[opnfv-tech-discuss] ONS conference in LA

I was just wondering who would be going to the ONS conference in LA in March 26? I and Al will be going. There are 2 days of dev forum and perhaps we could have a joint opnfv session on data plane benchmarking if there are still time open slots in the OPNFV track. Or we could at least meet for

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ONS conference in LA

Ray, Looks like this wiki is for the Plugfest in June? I’m not sure I will be able to go so I can’t commit to it. Is there any tech talk option for OPNFV projects at the ONS summit dev forum? Thanks Alec From: Raymond Paik Date: Friday, March 2, 2018 at 2:16 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ah

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ONS conference in LA

Alec From: "pierre.ly...@keysight.com" Date: Friday, March 2, 2018 at 3:54 PM To: "rp...@linuxfoundation.org" , "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" Cc: "richardx.el...@intel.com" , "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" , "trevor.coo...@intel.com&q

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ONS conference in LA

… So that makes me concerned given that every one of the above topics is practically large enough to deserve a normal session. Perhaps Ray can touch a word on the break-out session format. Thanks Alec From: Bob Monkman Date: Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 9:49 PM To: "Alec Hothan

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ONS conference in LA

far, logistics will be pretty bare bone with multiple break out session sharing a large room) Thanks Alec From: Tina Tsou Date: Friday, March 9, 2018 at 8:51 AM To: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" Cc: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , Bob Monkman , "pierre.ly...@keysight.com"

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ONS conference in LA

. Thanks Alec From: Georg Kunz Date: Monday, March 12, 2018 at 12:15 PM To: Tina Tsou , "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" Cc: Brian Brooks , Honnappa Nagarahalli , Sirshak Das , "pierre.ly...@keysight.com" , "richardx.el...@intel.com"

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ONS conference in LA

: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , Georg Kunz , "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" , "Rao, Sridhar" Cc: Brian Brooks , Honnappa Nagarahalli , Sirshak Das , "pierre.ly...@keysight.com" , "richardx.el...@intel.com" , "trevor.coo...@intel.com" , &q

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV Breakout during LFN Developer Forum

Hi Ray, Do you have any more specifics about the 2 rooms available for the still unscheduled break out sessions (“in room Lou Feliz or another hacking area on the 6th floor”) – such as capacity, size, number of tables, table disposition etc…? I think it would be best if the still unscheduled br

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [NFVbench] TRex vs NFVbench

Hi Rias, Generating traffic is one critical part of the data plane benchmarking but it is not sufficient, which is why you will see more and more projects augmenting traffic generators like TRex with domain specific value add/automation. There are several projects in OPNFV that use TRex (at lea

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Test working group breakout sessions at ONS

If you are interested in discussing or learning more about testing tools for OPNFV, there will be 2 break-out sessions: Monday afternoon Lou Feliz at 2PM: more focused on Data Plane Benchmarking and tools (VSPERF/FD.io CSIT/NFVbench) Tuesday morning K-town at 11:30PM: more focused on Long Durati

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [nfvbench] testpmd

the first packet to go through to guarantee optimal forwarding conditions. If your SUT requires a pause, this can be added to NFVbench relatively easily. Thanks Alec From: "Balint, Peter (Nokia - HU/Budapest)" Date: Thursday, March 29, 2018 at 1:39 AM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)&

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [RelEng] Docker container build triggered by tag + committers permission on DockerHub folder

Hi Trevor Finally found a bit of time to try the new trigger to build a container based on a tag (introduced in https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/48049) Given that I could not find any documentation on how to do that, could you check if I missed anything? The tentative diff in releng file to a

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [RelEng] Docker container build triggered by tag + committers permission on DockerHub folder

To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Subject: Re: [RelEng] Docker container build triggered by tag + committers permission on DockerHub folder Hi Alec, If your project has a '{project}-docker-build-push-{stream}' job defined[1] any

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] planning for next plufest

Sorry I could not attend this week’s meeting, have you guys planned to do anything at the coming plugfest/ETSI Plugtest? I have been asked if there will be any possibility to run NFVbench on any of the ETSI interop pods that will be used for ETSI plugtest - this will be for L2/L3 traffic only a

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer]

Traditional OpenStack testing tool have had a pretty hard time to support multiple openstack releases because the openstack API community has been very opinionated in managing API evolution and backward compatibility. I’d like to provide some feedback from my perspective, if you forget for a

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer]

[sorry sent previous email too early] Traditional OpenStack testing tool have had a pretty hard time to support multiple openstack releases because the openstack API community has been very opinionated in managing API evolution and backward compatibility. I’d like to provide some feedback from

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer]

Hi Cedric, Inline… From: "ollivier.ced...@gmail.com" Date: Sunday, April 22, 2018 at 11:17 AM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , David McBride , Aaron Smith , Fatih Degirmenci Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [baromete

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] planning for next plufest

we can run basic L2 forwarding tests. Who is going to the plugfest from the vsperf team (outside of Al)? Thanks Alec From: "Cooper, Trevor" Date: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 1:52 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , "Rao, Sridhar" , "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][documentation][fraser] MS9 - final documentation (TODAY)

I tried to read through the wiki and had some questions… https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Git+Tagging+Instructions+for+Fraser I just cloned releng and did not find any yaml file that has a “releases:” section yet, is it normal or am I the first to do? The example in the wiki is still pretty

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][documentation][fraser] MS9 - final documentation (TODAY)

, 2018 at 2:26 PM To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" Cc: Aric Gardner , "Beierl, Mark" , David McBride , opnfv-project-leads , TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][documentation][fraser] MS9 - final documentation (TODAY) Hi Alec, On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 04

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] nfv-bench without openstack pod

Hi Sirshak, You are correct that the doc does not describe clearly how to use nfvbench on non openstack testbeds – as this feature has been added recently. I’ll make sure to get it added. In the meantime, here are the instructions. To run nfvbench without openstack, provide a config file w

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Agenda for weekly meeting - 2018-05-23

Cross-plane interference verification is critical to proper operation and planning and would be great to add to OVP. I am planning to discuss about this kind of test with the Bottleneck team at the plugfest since that is what Bottleneck should be able to support. As for which data plane tool is

  1   2   >