Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [ovsnfv] Discussion points (outlier) for PriPath

2017-01-30 Thread Tapio Tallgren
On 01/30/2017 01:48 PM, Lee, Chunghan wrote: Hi Billy, Thank you for the reply. I can understand the experiment condition clearly. */>[[BO'M]] This is a valid suggestion and is worth investigating. I would like to use linux tracing tools such as perf to see when or if the pmd thread in/**//

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [ovsnfv] Discussion points (outlier) for PriPath

2017-01-30 Thread Lee, Chunghan
Hi Billy, Thank you for the reply. I can understand the experiment condition clearly. >[[BO'M]] This is a valid suggestion and is worth investigating. I would like >to use linux tracing tools such as perf to see when or if the pmd thread in >testpmd is de-scheculed and if so for how long. Actual

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [ovsnfv] Discussion points (outlier) for PriPath

2017-01-29 Thread Lee, Chunghan
Hi Billy, # Sorry for the duplication. I revise the mail title for OPNFV mailing list. I considered that the reason why the outlier (such as, 120-200 or 200-400) for Hi Pri PTP is observed with 120% tput. There are two estimation for the outlier. The first one is VM scheduling latency. In this