Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [infra] xci mini failed on SuperMicro

2017-07-21 Thread Dave Urschatz
3-1201 From: on behalf of Juan Vidal ALLENDE Date: Friday, July 21, 2017 at 9:00 AM To: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" , "mchand...@suse.de" Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [infra] xci mini failed on SuperMicro This is something some of us faced a couple of we

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [infra] xci mini failed on SuperMicro

2017-07-21 Thread Dave Urschatz
Vidal ALLENDE Date: Friday, July 21, 2017 at 9:00 AM To: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" , "mchand...@suse.de" Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [infra] xci mini failed on SuperMicro This is something some of us faced a couple of weeks ago. It seems to be an issue with la

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [infra] xci mini failed on SuperMicro

2017-07-21 Thread Juan Vidal ALLENDE
This is something some of us faced a couple of weeks ago. It seems to be an issue with latest OSA. My solution was using a "safe" OSA version. I picked this SHA 0648818c64239b534d00db381c4609f28e40bda9 Regards, Juan On vie, 2017-07-21 at 13:36 +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: On 21/07/17 13:27,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [infra] xci mini failed on SuperMicro

2017-07-21 Thread Markos Chandras
On 21/07/17 13:27, Dave Urschatz wrote: > Hi Fatih. > > XCI_FLAVOR=mini failed > > On: > > Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 v4 @ 1.70GHz, CPU=2, Cores=12, RAM=64GB, > HD=2x2T > > Distribution=Ubuntu 16.04.02 > > > > $ export XCI_FLAVOR=mini > > $ export OPENSTACK_OSA_VERSION=d4ae08646d1c1192e5

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [infra] xci mini failed on SuperMicro

2017-07-21 Thread Dave Urschatz
Hi Fatih. XCI_FLAVOR=mini failed On: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 v4 @ 1.70GHz, CPU=2, Cores=12, RAM=64GB, HD=2x2T Distribution=Ubuntu 16.04.02 $ export XCI_FLAVOR=mini $ export OPENSTACK_OSA_VERSION=d4ae08646d1c1192e5806be2f81b1748f520fd39 $ export LOG_PATH=/home/xci/xcilogs ~/releng/prototypes/x