.
If you think otherwise, please speak up now.
Best regards
Georg
From: Cooper, Trevor [mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:38 PM
To: Georg Kunz ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Email vote on merge of SDNVPN test
cases
+1
+1
From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Georg Kunz
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 7:54 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail] Email vote on merge of SDNVPN test
cases
Hi
Hi Dovetailers,
Thank you for the votes so far. As an intermediate result, we have 5 +1 votes,
which is a majority. Nevertheless, this is a kind reminder for the Dovetail
committers who have not voted yet to cast their vote.
Thanks a lot.
Cheers
Georg
From: Georg Kunz
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2
+1
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:33 AM, Zenghui Shi wrote:
> +1
>
> zenghui
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Georg Kunz
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dovetailers,
>>
>>
>>
>> You are all well aware of the accidental merge of the SDNVPN test case
>> scope and description [1] without a +1 vote from a majority
+1
zenghui
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Georg Kunz wrote:
> Hi Dovetailers,
>
>
>
> You are all well aware of the accidental merge of the SDNVPN test case
> scope and description [1] without a +1 vote from a majority of the
> committers. We have discussed how to handle this already a few ti
+1
Leo Wang
On Jun 26, 2017, at 16:34, Georg Kunz
mailto:georg.k...@ericsson.com>> wrote:
Hi Dovetailers,
You are all well aware of the accidental merge of the SDNVPN test case scope
and description [1] without a +1 vote from a majority of the committers. We
have discussed how to handle this
Thanks Georg.
+1
Wenjing
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 1:34 AM, Georg Kunz wrote:
> Hi Dovetailers,
>
>
>
> You are all well aware of the accidental merge of the SDNVPN test case
> scope and description [1] without a +1 vote from a majority of the
> committers. We have discussed how to handle this a
Hi Dovetailers,
You are all well aware of the accidental merge of the SDNVPN test case scope
and description [1] without a +1 vote from a majority of the committers. We
have discussed how to handle this already a few times, but we have not yet
reached an officially documented conclusion. Since