Luke,
If there is overlap, we can use my account.
Ash
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 13, 2016, at 05:59, Kunzmann, Gerald
> wrote:
>
> Hi Luke,
>
> 1) Go to https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Meetings and check in
> the table whether there is already another project is using this
It doesn't matter to me. The issue is making sure the info is up to date,
especially if calendar invites are used. Also, I really wish we could discuss
stuff via email or discussion forum first. My preference has and continues to
be for Discourse. But I think we are trying to have too complex of
Thanks, Lincoln! I'm looking forward to meeting you in person.
Best,
Ash
Sent from my iPad
> On Nov 30, 2016, at 1:24 PM, Lincoln Lavoie wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> Apologizes for the untagged message, but I wanted to make sure I reached
> everyone attending the plugfest / hackfest next wee
Hi Margaret,
I think you just touched on the issue. I will try to summarize:
1) Goals for Polestar were set by SPC
2) SPC has been dissolved
3) Are Polestar goals still valid? This is what we have been trying to validate
from the BoD, for past several weeks, since it was originally raised. As fa
Firstly, I agree with the bullets and with what Chris just said. And I don't
think you're mistaken on your understanding. As I stated on our Polestar call,
this morning, I think if we can identify the gaps between the architectural
work we're doing and our current release work, we'll be better e
I've got the energy part covered
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 2, 2016, at 08:47, Christopher Price wrote:
>
> I'll tackle the administration in the calls but may struggle to replicate the
> energy provided. :)
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Nov 2
Margaret,
I know you're on vacation, but wasn't sure if you had a backup for the next
couple meetings. I'm not seeing a response to this, but will be on the calls.
Still working on action items from last week.
Best,
Ash
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 20, 2016, at 09:13, Margaret Chiosi
> wro
Hi Chris,
I had/have the same question. I don't think it's very intuitive to go to
Project D for use cases for Project M.
Ash
Sent from my iPad
> On Oct 31, 2016, at 8:43 AM, Christopher Price wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> Why would this not be done in the multisite project?
> https://wiki.o
During Bin's tech discuss call this morning. Was on Bin's agenda.
Ash
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 20, 2016, at 11:04, Beierl, Mark wrote:
>
> Sorry for perhaps not paying attention.
>
> When or where was this being discussed? I like the slides :)
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>
> Mark Beierl
> Adv
Congratulations, Chris!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 23, 2016, at 21:33, Raymond Paik wrote:
>
> All,
>
> The nomination period for the Committer Board Election closed at 5pm Pacific
> Time today, and I only received one nomination from Chris Price. Although
> this may seem like a formalit
we do have to keep that sort of thing in
> mind.
>
>> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Ashlee Young
>> wrote:
>> I can make a meeting on 10/6, but will be on my way back from Disney :)
>>
>> So, previously, I had my Github location as my primary
I can make a meeting on 10/6, but will be on my way back from Disney :)
So, previously, I had my Github location as my primary spot, which worked great
for trying to build up a community. It was easier than the current private
Gerrit arrangement. But it also has a downside. After discussion with
That's what I did for ONOSFW. If it sits behind a private gerrit, then they
don't know to use what they can't see.
Sent from my iPad
> On Sep 26, 2016, at 12:54 AM, Luke Hinds wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am sure this might have already been discussed, if so apologies.
>
> Is there any reason we do
13 matches
Mail list logo
