[opnfv-tech-discuss] [qtip] Agenda for project meeting 2017-02-20

https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/qtip-meetings-2017-02-20 *# QTIP project weekly meeting on 2017-02-20* - time: UTC0730 - irc://#opnfv-qtip@freenode - index: https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/qtip-meetings *## Action followup* - yujunz presentation about new code framework next week d

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [qtip][storperf] test coverage

Thank you, Mark. Copied the brief guide to https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/QTIP-204 CC also @Julien who has volunteered to take this task in QTIP On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:39 PM Beierl, Mark wrote: > Hello, > > I am sorry for the delay in responding. The Jenkins coverage report is > created usi

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest][multisite] restore kingbird functest

Hello, Kingbird functest was excluded from Functest due to python client dependency conflict. But in Functest container, the kingbird was installed only for tempest plugin descovery and execution of tempest test cases. Kingbird is not sensitive to the python client version of OpenStack. So it's

[opnfv-tech-discuss] FW: Security Group Weekly Meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Customized Time Zone BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T02

[opnfv-tech-discuss] FW: Security Group Weekly Meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Customized Time Zone BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T02

[opnfv-tech-discuss] FW: Security Group Weekly Meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Customized Time Zone BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T02

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [mano-wg] Best Practices and Wiki updates for Release-E Inputs sought from MANO WG particpants

Hi all, Have updated the MANOWG Meeting#18 (last two weeks) summary https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6827111 Please feel free to edit and update MANO pages to reflect what MANO WG must do to co-ordinate with other work groups and Projects: Refer Cross Work Group/Project Co-or

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] MS6 for NetReady

Hi David This is the status of the NetReady project for milestone 6: Test case implementation: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/28697/ Documentation according to Danube structure: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/28697/ Best regards Georg ___ op

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] [Announce] OPNFV E-release naming

+1 Euphrates Robert (Bob) Monkman Networking Software Strategy & Ecosystem Programs ARM 150 Rose Orchard Way San Jose, Ca 95134 M: +1.510.676.5490 Skype: robert.monkman -Original Message- From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org]

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] [Announce] OPNFV E-release naming

Hi Ray, I think Euphrates would be a great choice. For European choices, Ebro and Elbe come to mind, but I really like the idea of going back to Asia for the next release. Thanks, Dave. On 02/15/2017 04:49 PM, Raymond Paik wrote: > All, > > As discussed on the last TSC call, I'd like to get th

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] MS6 for SFC

David et al, Here is the status of MS6 for the SFC project: Here are the new test cases in Danube: * Symmetric service chains: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/28523 * Service chains in multiple topologies: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/28921 And here are the Gerrit patches for the

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release] E-release schedule

“Today I spend > 80% of my time getting OPNFV to run” +1000 I think this is the #1 challenge facing OPNFV. It’s the primary driver for some strategic shifts in our approach to OPNFV and its technical direction this year: - Move quickly toward a containerized control plane that is highly

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Functest ODL-SFC

Hi, Thanks a lot. Modifying the timer did the trick. I'd be very glad to help by further testing Danube. But I have to release the hardware I´ve been using until now. So I don't know where I could continue testing. Best regards, Pau 2017-02-15 17:56 GMT+01:00 Manuel Buil : > Hi Pau, > > The C

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [fuel][plugins][odl]

Hi Experts! We have an environment, which consist of 3 Controller and 2 compute nodes, where we would like to try SFC. Deployment was done using Fuel, with OpenDaylight (with SFC features) and Openvswitch plugins installed. But after deployment in OpenDaylight DLUX user interface we don't have a

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [fuel][plugins][odl] SFC UI

Just want to modify subject. From: Chivkunov, Anton Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 1:53 PM To: 'opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org' Subject: [fuel][plugins][odl] Hi Experts! We have an environment, which consist of 3 Controller and 2 compute nodes, where we would like to try SFC. Deployment wa

[opnfv-tech-discuss] MS6 Functest

Hi David, This is the status of MS6 for Functest. - New internal test cases: o snaps_healthcheck: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/28011/ o api_check: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/25443/ o connection_check: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/25443/ o snaps_smoke:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [opnfvdocs] Documentation update for Danube release

Hi Stuart, It seems like this is something stored in Releng. This patch was merged two days ago but I don’t know what the status is. Maybe Aric or Shubham can answer? Regards, Sofia From: Stuart Mackie [mailto:wsmac...@juniper.net] Sent: den 17 februar