Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]L3VPN for dovetail area

I would like to clarify one thing for myself: Dovetail is (currently) about interface tests that test certain functionality using an interface, and not about how fast or good the implementation for that functionality is. Yardstick, in my mind, is about running performance tests to benchmark the

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] Further discussion of NFVI / APP monitoring

Hi Aaron, Doctors, all, These topics looks very important indeed when looking to reach Telco requirements for fault management as a whole. Totally +1 for this discussion. Doctor has not yet addressed the actual monitoring part that much and would be nice to get that in shape. That is also compl

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] Weekly Call

Good day Yujun, I was also not able to attend yesterdays meeting. VSPERF Project Meetings (link ) IRC meeting minutes for 2017-01-26 (link

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] Weekly Call

Hi, testers I'm currently on vacation and may not be able to attend the testperf meeting today. It seems something is required from my side about Test Ecosystem diagram[1] Trevor Cooper I think additional input or a discussion would be helpful. I added a n

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [daisy4nfv] Weekly meeting 0800UTC Jan. 27 & Feb. 3 cancelled

Hi Team, Weekly meetings on Jan. 27 & Feb. 3 have been cancelled for Chinese New Year vacation. B. R., Zhijiang___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-disc

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Continuing the Quarterly Awards discussion

We may also consider recognition for *Leadership*. The candidates could be - Working group leader/coordinators - PTLs - Outstanding core developer who leads some in-project or cross-project subject On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 8:31 AM Raymond Paik wrote: > All, > > Following up on our d

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Continuing the Quarterly Awards discussion

+1 for interns For voting, I would suggest keep it in TSC. I thought also about PTLs or community's voting. But PTLs may not have a global view of the activity in community and community's voting is likely ending as a competition on which project has most members... On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 8:31

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tacker Plugin MIssing From Danube Nightly ISO

Hi Aimee, indeed tacker is not included in Fuel Danube right now, building and including this plugin was disabled during uplifting to Fuel 10. Are you planning to include the tacker plugin in

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Continuing the Quarterly Awards discussion

All, Following up on our discussion on the TSC call. A number of people made a suggestion to move away from quarterly awards and have community recognition after each release (in addition to annual awards at the Summit). For the Quarterly Awards, we have been selecting winners for the following

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]L3VPN for dovetail area

Thanks Bryan. See my response inline below. Wenjing From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L [mailto:bs3...@att.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 11:32 AM To: Wenjing Chu ; Pierre Lynch ; Jose Lausuch Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]L3VPN for dovetail area I posted some

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] For the "quarterly projects health metrics" discussion on the TSC call

All, I posted an updated metrics data at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/Quarterly+Reports#QuarterlyReports-QuarterlyProjectsHealth When I presented the data last week, I was missing data for several projects and added a few footnotes based on the discussion on the TSC call. Let me know if you

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] Using compressed sf_nsh_colorado.qcow2 VM image

Good idea Juan. I uploaded it to: http://artifacts.opnfv.org/apex/random/sfc_cloud.qcow2 However when I virt-sparsified it only reduced it to 1GB. Tim Rozet Red Hat SDN Team - Original Message - From: "Manuel Buil" To: "juan vidal allende" , opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Sent: We

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]L3VPN for dovetail area

I posted some comments in gerrit. Here are the main points I think we need alignment on: 1) All proposed dovetail included tests will be added one-by-one, in a separate commit. 2) The commit will include a link to the details of the test case (script or otherwise what I would use to

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]L3VPN for dovetail area

The process that we may have already being informally following is as follows. We work towards having consensus on majority of areas that arise within the dovetail project. If there are open questions that we can’t resolve, we could gather the relevant info and bring that to TSC for decision. I

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] Using compressed sf_nsh_colorado.qcow2 VM image

Hello Juan, Cool, sounds like a great idea! Only contributors to infra project can upload images in the opnfv artifactory. You will need to contact them (e.g. fatih.degirme...@ericsson.com) Regards, Manuel >>> Juan Vidal ALLENDE 01/25/17 4:19 PM >>> Hello guys, I used the virt-sparsi

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tacker Plugin MIssing From Danube Nightly ISO

Greetings Fuel team - Quick question -- the Colorado 3.0 Fuel ISO has a tacker plugin (tacker-0.2-0.2.0-1.noarch.rpm) but that plugin is missing from the Fuel nightly build I downloaded on 24 January ( artifacts.opnfv.org/fuel/opnfv-2017-01-25_00-00-11.iso). Are you planning to include the tacker p

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]L3VPN for dovetail area

IMHO, getting agreement on what the scope of testing will be (features, etc) should be pretty urgent. How should we go about it? Agree within the Dovetail team, then run it to the TSC to get their blessing? Should we consolidate this process with the current ongoing discussion on scenario consol

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Models] vHello_Tacker pre-reqs

Hi Bryan- Thanks for the email. In the Monday meeting, you have cleared my doubts. I'm setting up this environment. To test the script. Next Monday meeting I believe I may have doubts/suggestions on this. Thanks a lot for the mail. / Trinath From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L [mailto:bs3...@att.com] Sent:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Danube Status - ready to test in labs?

Thanks, let me review the docs and see if I can map to the input file params. I need this to be scripted so I can repeat it as an automated process, similar to how CI/CD works. So I need to know the details of what the fields mean, mandatory/optional, and how to set them. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [VSPERF] Weekly Call

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Pacific Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0700 TZOFFSETTO:-0800 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T02000

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Canceled: NetReady weekly meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:CANCEL PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:UTC BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+ TZOFFSETTO:+ END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+ TZOFFSETTO:+ END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGI

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] Using compressed sf_nsh_colorado.qcow2 VM image

Hello guys, I used the virt-sparsify[0] command to compress the .qcow image sf_nsh_colorado.qcow2 that we are using for our OPNFV-SFC tests, and I reduced the size to almost 1/5 of the original one (559M vs. 2.4G previously). The small tests that I ran went well, so I think that we could start

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]L3VPN for dovetail area

Thanks Chris, that makes things clearer. But still, it is a broad statement and difficult to measure. I guess and as you say, the TSC has the final word when approving features to be verified/certified in Dovetail with existing tests. From functional prospective, I can just provide and overview

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] Weekly meeting cancelled

Hey guys, Brady asked me to cancel the meeting as he is sick and there is also not much updates to give. We can do them in the mailing list if needed. Regards, Manuel ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://list

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Models] vHello_Tacker pre-reqs

Trinath, I saw a note on the #opnfv-models channel but did not get a chance to respond * bryan_att: hi, for running VHello_Tacker.sh, what is the pre-required environment ? For Danube, I am still updating vHello_Tacker.sh and the related tacker-setup.sh to Newton. They will be intended

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Danube Status - ready to test in labs?

Hi Bryan, You could use Fuel UI to avoid editing of yaml files: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/fuel-docs/userdocs/fuel-install-guide.html Anyway change of every value is not required. Usually network settings are modified (i.e. interfaces, networks, vlan range, ips & etc.). In most cases thi

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]L3VPN for dovetail area

Hi Jose, The intent of this statement is that we should not attempt to establish compliance tests on features or capabilities that are unique to a very specific configuration or composition of components. The statement is intended to mean that we should focus our efforts on compliance on “gener

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] FW: Checking in the the Policytest project in OPNFV.

Will do On Tue, Jan 24, 2017, 2:46 PM Raymond Paik wrote: > Thanks Bryan... > > People maybe able to see this in the email chain, but it also looks like 2 > (out of the original 5) committers are no longer active in OPNFV. With no > activity since formation, there shouldn't be any impact to exi

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV Helpdesk #35878] [linuxfoundation.org #35878] Re: [releng][helpdesk] Problem with Git/Gerrit/Jenkins

HI Fatih, Thanks for your quick check. The remerged had helped to bring back the table... Let's see docs team's reply on it. I agree gerrit was fine not raising conflict as the changed line in the "editorial" patch was not conflicting with the other patch. Still, shouldn't gerrit have just chan

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV Helpdesk #35878] [linuxfoundation.org #35878] Re: [releng][helpdesk] Problem with Git/Gerrit/Jenkins

HI Fatih, Thanks for your quick check. The remerged had helped to bring back the table... Let's see docs team's reply on it. I agree gerrit was fine not raising conflict as the changed line in the "editorial" patch was not conflicting with the other patch. Still, shouldn't gerrit have just chan

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV Helpdesk #35878] [linuxfoundation.org #35878] Re: [releng][helpdesk] Problem with Git/Gerrit/Jenkins

Hi, I had a quick look at this and diffed the commits and I see no conflict so Gerrit was fine not raising conflict. (the changed line in 05-implementation.rst in most recent patch is not a conflicting change) I then tried regenerating the documents by putting remerge as comment to check the d

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng][helpdesk] Problem with Git/Gerrit/Jenkins

Hi, I had a quick look at this and diffed the commits and I see no conflict so Gerrit was fine not raising conflict. (the changed line in 05-implementation.rst in most recent patch is not a conflicting change) I then tried regenerating the documents by putting remerge as comment to check the d

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [APEX] error while deploying dependency clash

Hey, I do have the following error when running apex deployment: --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: python2-pandas-0.19.1-2.el7.1.x86_64 (delorean-newton-testing) Requires: python2-numexpr Error: Package: python2-pandas-0.19.1-2.el7.1.x86_64 (delorean-newton-testing)

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]dovetail weekly meeting( IRC meeting) 1/27

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:China Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:DAYLIGHT E

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]L3VPN for dovetail area

Hi Hongbo, Test cases must pass on OPNFV reference deployments * Tests must not require a specific NFVi platform composition or installation tool Can you please explain what this statement exactly means? By "installation tool" are we talking about the installers we have or a specif

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [releng][helpdesk] Problem with Git/Gerrit/Jenkins

Dear all, Not sure how is the best team to address this to. We have noticed the following issue: In Doctor project there had been two patches merged on the alarm comparison table in Section 5.5.3: - https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/26715 - https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/2723

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] New OPNFV Project Proposal - SNAPS-OO

Hi The link below includes a trailing ) https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/SNAPS-OO should take you straight to the page BR Maryam From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Steven Pisarski Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017