Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 2mb flash not OpenWRT-Target?

2010-02-19 Thread edgar . soldin
On 19.02.2010 16:47, Bas Mevissen wrote: On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 16:24 +0100, Benjamin Henrion wrote: The Asus WL520GC I just bought is running Linux. It has 2MB of flash. Wow, I assumed that out of the box, these devices with a small amount of flash did not run Linux. That was true in the past

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] add gesftpserver package

2010-02-19 Thread edgar . soldin
out of interest, whats the advance/difference to the openssh one? ... ede On 19.02.2010 16:02, Raphaël HUCK wrote: Hi, this patch adds geftpserver package. This server is taken from http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/sftpserver/index.html It will need the patch to add bzr support to include/down

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Automount enhanced/fixed, also fstab

2010-02-19 Thread edgar . soldin
This reads to me only as not primary target. Not as in "we do not support that". The point is that no developer will care whether OpenWrt runs on 2MB flash and no efforts are made to make sure that the system remains usable with only 2MB - I think this qualifies as "unsupported", it may work, if

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Automount enhanced/fixed, also fstab

2010-02-20 Thread edgar . soldin
>> >> well, How about one big additional storage package then? Additionally >> enabling swapon and blkid from busybox? >> This also makes it easier to maintain. There is enough stuff already in >> base files. > > One or two packages is the solution we'll be going for, with swapon and > blkid en

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 2mb flash not OpenWRT-Target?

2010-02-24 Thread edgar . soldin
> > Indeed. The only difference is that there is no predefined config for > such small targets, so you have to manually select the part of busybox > you want to strip, and similarly for the kernel config. > You should be able to get pretty close to DD-WRT's config, while still > benefitting from

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] dropbear: allow multiple listen ports to be configured

2010-02-28 Thread edgar . soldin
Let's keep it simple and backward compatible. Change new config to ports but also add old port setting to this list. Something like: config_get ports "${section}" Ports config_get port "${section}" Port ports="$port $ports" Perfect of course would be a log message telling deprecation of port set

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] eth1 not working in ubiquiti nanostation m

2010-02-28 Thread edgar . soldin
When you have an old working trunk version you can try to narrow down the changeset that broke trunk. Check out revisions, compile, flash and test. Efficient is trying the circa middle between known broken and known working revision. When broken then raise known broken revision. When it's working l

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] dropbear: allow multiple listen ports to be configured

2010-02-28 Thread edgar . soldin
Don't missunderstand me please: I say switch to ports but don't break old configs by means of keeping port working in the background, maybe supported with a deprecation message for users with old config ;) .. ede On 28.02.2010 13:40, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote: > To me that's even more co

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Backfire 10.03-beta

2010-03-04 Thread edgar . soldin
Highlights: * brcm-2.4 updated to 2.4.37 kernel why not recent 2.4.39, the 2.4 kernel doesn't have major changes anymore but some more bugfixes http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/ChangeLog-2.4.37.9 http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/ChangeLog-2.4.37.8 when I tried it compi

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Backfire 10.03-beta

2010-03-04 Thread edgar . soldin
Kernel is already the latest, 2.4.37.9. http://downloads.openwrt.org/backfire/10.03-beta/brcm-2.4/packages/kernel_2.4.37.9-1_brcm-2.4.ipk well done .. ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mai

[OpenWrt-Devel] syslog-ng3 latest and log kernel messages patch

2010-03-19 Thread edgar . soldin
this patch adds logging of kernel messages to the config file upgrades to latest version 3.0.5 Thanks Ede Index: feeds/packages/admin/syslog-ng3/files/syslog-ng.conf === --- feeds/packages/admin/syslog-ng3/files/syslog-ng.conf (Revisi

[OpenWrt-Devel] Fwd: add vars for uci firewall include scripts

2010-03-19 Thread edgar . soldin
hi jow, just a friendly reminder .. Thanks ede Original Message Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] add vars for uci firewall include scripts Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:00:37 +0100 From: edgar.sol...@web.de Reply-To: OpenWrt Development List To: OpenWrt Development List the change to uci_

[OpenWrt-Devel] netfilter kernel module makefile description patch

2010-03-19 Thread edgar . soldin
there seem to be some leftovers from https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/6257 this patch fixes the descriptions of kmod package ipt-conntrack Thanks ede Index: package/kernel/modules/netfilter.mk === --- package/kernel/modules/netfilter.m

[OpenWrt-Devel] Fwd: [PATCH] block-*; the right one this time :-/

2010-03-20 Thread edgar . soldin
Seems like chore's block mount fsck patches didn't make it into trunk. the rest seems to be there .. Regards ede Original Message Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] block-*; the right one this time :-/ Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:29:02 -0500 From: Daniel Dickinson Reply-To: OpenWrt

[OpenWrt-Devel] svn download error caused by changeset 20299

2010-03-20 Thread edgar . soldin
https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/20299 breaks compatibility to svn version before 1.6, when it was introduced. error: Checking out files from the svn repository... svn: invalid option: --trust-server-cert Type 'svn help' for usage. Regards ede ___ op

[OpenWrt-Devel] Ping: Fwd: add vars for uci firewall include scripts

2010-04-07 Thread edgar . soldin
and again .. a reminder of the reminder .. thanks ede Original Message hi jow, just a friendly reminder .. Thanks ede Original Message Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] add vars for uci firewall include scripts Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:00:37 +0100 From: edgar.sol...@w

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Multiple setups on an ethernet interface

2010-04-15 Thread edgar . soldin
Apropos custom rules .. this patch is still pending .. ede On 15.04.2010 15:02, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Remaining problem is access to the dsl modem, a new zone should be created to allow masquerading, and I don't see how eth0.1 could be in wan& d

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Multiple setups on an ethernet interface

2010-04-15 Thread edgar . soldin
You did earlier (9.12.2009) .. https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2009-December/005384.html anyway you are right. They can be pulled manually as well. These vars were set in "white russian", but didn't survive "kamikaze". I feel they are convenient. LANDEV is missing because it

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] menuconfig vs kernel_menuconfig

2010-04-19 Thread edgar . soldin
menuconfig overrules settings in kernel_menuconfig .. check trunk/include/kernel_defaults.mk .. ede On 19.04.2010 16:08, Kövesdi György wrote: Hi, Some kernel parameters can be configured in 'make menuconfig', but not all of them. The full configuration is in 'make kernel_menuconfig', but its

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] menuconfig vs kernel_menuconfig

2010-04-21 Thread edgar . soldin
Wiz, no need to use "kernel_menuconfig" for that .. Simply enable the mmc module in "menuconfig/Kernel Modules" as module or built-in and it will be there as package/in the image. regards ede On 21.04.2010 01:50, RHS Linux User wrote: Hi Felix and All, Thanks so much for your note.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire][bug] setting LAN mac address, makes router inaccessible from LAN

2010-04-29 Thread edgar . soldin
So for others without serial access or JTAG, this issue is like a bricked router. This issue should definitely be on the known problems page [1] and verified on other devices. Wouldn't it still be possible to tftp flash the router? Looks like it .. ede __

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire][bug] setting LAN mac address, makes router inaccessible from LAN

2010-04-29 Thread edgar . soldin
On 29.04.2010 20:38, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote: > > On 29.04.2010 10:34, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: >> >>> So for others without serial access or JTAG, this issue is like a >>> bricked router. >>> This issue should definitely be on the known problems page [1] and >>> verified on other devic

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Stopping watchdog

2010-05-03 Thread edgar . soldin
On 03.05.2010 15:59, Yury Polyanskiy wrote: On Mon, 3 May 2010 09:35:59 + Vasilis Tsiligiannis wrote: + [ -c /dev/watchdog ]&& echo "V"> /dev/watchdog Why is this needed? busybox watchdog applet writes the magic on shutdown. What is magic? In this context .. thanks ede __

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-09 Thread edgar . soldin
That's how it works. Y adds kernel modules to the kernel, and programs to the image. ..ede On 09.05.2010 18:10, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote: > In 'make menuconfig' I included them with 'Y' instead of 'M'. > According to my (newbie) knowledge that adds them to the kernel image. > Can somebody

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-09 Thread edgar . soldin
true, my bad, actually one can see it in the end of a make run, how the packages (incl. kmods) are installed to the image filesystem. thanks ede On 09.05.2010 18:19, Bernhard Loos wrote: > Actually, Y in menuconfig doesn't add the modules into the kernel, > they will still be kernel modules. It o

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-10 Thread edgar . soldin
there is partly in https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/include/kernel-defaults.mk line 101 you can actually add CONFIG_KERNEL_* entries to your .config and they are copied over as CONFIG_* to the kernel config. All that's missing is a menuconfig interface for that. But at least for routers u

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-10 Thread edgar . soldin
but wouldn't the increase in the kernel image actually equal the decrease in the squash image and therefore the size of the rootfs_data stay the same? Both are lzma compressed. ..ede On 10.05.2010 19:16, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote: > It may not downsize the packages themselves, but moving

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-10 Thread edgar . soldin
are these sizes fixed or calculated according the space requirement? Looks like the linux size is fixed, what is the maximum size for a kernel on wrt54g? .. ede On 10.05.2010 23:28, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote: > Kernel and rootfs are in two different mtd partitions on the WRT54G: > > # dme

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-10 Thread edgar . soldin
Then it'd make total sense to stuff in whatever fits there .. thanks for the enlightenment, ede On 10.05.2010 23:38, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote: > The "linux" partition spans over the kernel and the complete rootfs for > flashing. > The maximum kernel size is 0x000bc000 (begin of "rootfs") m

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-10 Thread edgar . soldin
On 10.05.2010 23:47, Bernhard Loos wrote: > 2010/5/10 Bernhard Loos : >> 2010/5/10 Matthias Buecher / Germany : >>> The "linux" partition spans over the kernel and the complete rootfs for >>> flashing. >>> The maximum kernel size is 0x000bc000 (begin of "rootfs") minus >>> 0x0004 (begin of "lin

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-11 Thread edgar . soldin
On 11.05.2010 17:25, Stefan Monnier wrote: but wouldn't the increase in the kernel image actually equal the decrease in the squash image and therefore the size of the rootfs_data stay the same? Both are lzma compressed. I expect that a kernel with some modules built-in will be smaller (both in

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] failed to install feed oprofile

2010-05-24 Thread edgar . soldin
You need to use kernel 2.6. Enable menuconfig->Global build settings->Compile the kernel with profiling enabled then enable menuconfig->Development->oprofile Don't forget to recompile the kernel. ede On 24.05.2010 11:13, oii...@aol.com wrote: thank you, I couldn't find the oprofile option i

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [openjump-users] Re: VS: Off-list: Mobile GPS solution in OJ

2010-06-23 Thread edgar . soldin
t 10:57 AM, Jukka Rahkonen mailto:jukka.rahko...@latuviitta.fi>> wrote: Edgar Soldin wrote: > On 08.06.2010 16:48, Larry Becker wrote: >> Seems like GPSylon is a large program and you only need the small >> portion ( gpsinput library?) that communi

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] dnsmasq bogus nxdomains

2010-07-16 Thread edgar . soldin
sweet, simple and effective. You should put the example configuration on the wiki as well for others suffering the symptoms. thanks ede On 16.07.2010 21:57, mickey wrote: > Hello, > > this patch extends the dnsmasq initscript with an option for bogus-nxdomain. > > From the manpage: > > -B, --b

[OpenWrt-Devel] svn access

2010-07-20 Thread edgar . soldin
In connection to the work on the gps extension I'd like to request access to the sourceforge svn. I think it'd make sense to store the plugin sources there for others to see and work with. My sourceforge id is e...@users.sourceforge.net . Thanks ede

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] svn access

2010-07-21 Thread edgar . soldin
ups .. wrong projects mailing list .. sorry, please ignore... ede On 21.07.2010 05:10, Weedy wrote: On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:59 AM, mailto:edgar.sol...@web.de>> wrote: In connection to the work on the gps extension I'd like to request access to the sourceforge svn. I think it'd make sense

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [openjump-users] Trojan in OJ.exe: Positive false message

2010-08-28 Thread edgar . soldin
I am tired of antivirus detecting viruses in the oj.exe windows starter. We can't send to each and every of them that it is a false positive every time. Solution: We have a working batch file starter. Having a second starter is a) confusing and b) unfortunately unsettling users with virus alerts

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [openjump-users] Trojan in OJ.exe: Positive false message

2010-08-28 Thread edgar . soldin
Wrong list .. sorry, please ignore .. ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [openjump-users] openjump.exe with ini

2010-09-01 Thread edgar . soldin
The reasons for a unified java launcher would be - java, which most contributors should understand - one ini file for all architectures - one routine to replace them all ;) (set classpath, build cmd line) sounds worth it to me. ..ede On 01.09.2010 17:34, Larry Becker wrote: It doesn't seem li

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Package dnsmasq init-file

2010-10-27 Thread edgar . soldin
On 27.10.2010 14:13, Bastian Bittorf wrote: If an already running DHCP-server is found on the configured interface, the init-script refuses to start, but does not give a hint why. It took us some days to track down this behavior in our MANET, where every wifi/adhoc-node runs it own DHCP-server. N

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] font for oj logo needed

2010-10-27 Thread edgar . soldin
sorry wrong list again, please ignore .. ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] oj icon on sourceforge

2010-10-31 Thread edgar . soldin
Stefan, could you please upload the attached icon to the sourceforge web? Login there and click on https://sourceforge.net/projects/jump-pilot/ on the sf-folder icon left to the title 'The JUMP Pilot Project'. I'd do it. But you know, I can't :). If there is nobody else currently administering

[OpenWrt-Devel] sextante loading mystery solved

2010-11-03 Thread edgar . soldin
phew, that was something. As it turns out. es.unex.sextante.openjump.extensions.SextanteToolboxPlugin detects the path to the extension dir as follows String sPath = System.getProperty("user.dir") + "/lib/ext"; 'user.dir' despite it's name holds the current working dir of the java vm. The old

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] sextante loading mystery solved

2010-11-03 Thread edgar . soldin
I do .. these open* projects all look the same in thunderbirds address suggestions .. I will have to find a solution for that. thanks & sorry, again, ede On 03.11.2010 20:10, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You keep writing to the wrong list ;) -BEGIN

[OpenWrt-Devel] gawk package

2010-12-27 Thread edgar . soldin
Could you please add http://projects.qi-hardware.com/index.php/p/openwrt-packages/source/tree/release_2010-11-17/gawk/Makefile to the package repository. Thanks ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.or

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] base-files: refactoring load_modules()

2011-01-20 Thread edgar . soldin
On 20.01.2011 06:50, Scott Nicholas wrote: > I like Bastian's refactorings using only ash builtins. if ever a micro > image is needed, sed/awk can go away. yes? for micro images usually busybox is used and awk/sed are available busybox applets. i really doubt that the size increase is in proport

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] base-files/hotplug: refactoring ifup/netstate V2

2011-01-20 Thread edgar . soldin
On 20.01.2011 13:40, John Crispin wrote: >> > without having stomach ache, when base breaks. > i dont get the "when base breaks" bit he means in case the modifications (in the 'alternative' base package) introduce a show stopping bug. ..ede ___ openwrt

[OpenWrt-Devel] build brcm-24 image with trunk

2011-02-01 Thread edgar . soldin
Is there a way to build a kernel 2.4 image for brcm47xx platform with the current buildroot in trunk? The target brcm-2.4 was removed a while ago. How would I do so, except of going back in svn history? thanks ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwr

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] dnsmasq leasefile fix

2011-02-15 Thread edgar . soldin
On 15.02.2011 11:13, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Peter Wagner writes: > >> - [ -n "$leasefile" ] && [ -e "$leasefile" ] || touch "$leasefile" >> + [ -n "$leasefile" ] && ( [ -e "$leasefile" ] || touch "$leasefile" ) > > Looks like this is fixed already by commit 15fba44a (but see point 6

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] dnsmasq leasefile fix

2011-02-15 Thread edgar . soldin
i see to reflect the date change the file is copied to jffs.. makes sense, so the touch alone is more expensive due to the nature of the overlaying fs :) .. thanks ede On 15.02.2011 12:50, Peter Wagner wrote: > no its not about what is more expensive but someone in the development > channel >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] lantiq: various fixes to the extract.sh script

2011-02-28 Thread edgar . soldin
On 28.02.2011 18:26, Luca Olivetti wrote: > [ ! -f ${DIR}decode_ifx_fw -a -f ${DIR}ifxmips_fw_decodev2.tar.bz2 ] These will break if the path contains spaces. Always enclose pathes in double quotes if you can't be sure that they never will include spaces. This is also true for the other places w

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Status of outstanding patches

2011-03-26 Thread edgar . soldin
write to Travis Kemen about the maintainer issue.. in case he didn't read your mail to the end.. regards ede On 25.03.2011 22:46, W. Michael Petullo wrote: > vips-7.24.1.patch, upgrade VIPS to 7.24.1 > > https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/8467 > > I'd be happy to take over the maintena

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Retaining WAN IP addresses across reboots

2011-04-13 Thread edgar . soldin
On 13.04.2011 19:18, Philip Prindeville wrote: > All of the platforms I have use a CMOS NVRAM with RTC built-in. > > do they have names? ;) ..ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How does one build just one KLM?

2011-05-12 Thread edgar . soldin
Could you post your makefile here?.. ede On 12.05.2011 02:02, John Zavgren wrote: > Thanks, Christian: > > I read the article on the wiki and then I tried "make > package/vislinkRcv/compile" from the TOPDIR (vislinkRcv is the stuff that I'm > developing) and no KLM was actually built. When I d

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How does one build just one KLM?

2011-05-12 Thread edgar . soldin
isn't it build in the build_dir or just not installed? i see no install definition in your makefile. as jow wrote > f you can you should consider packaging your source as an out-of-tree > module, see for example the KernelPackage / kmod defintions in > package/wprobe/Makefile . ede On 12.05.201

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How does one build just one KLM?

2011-05-12 Thread edgar . soldin
so where does a (in buildroot root) $> make package//{clean,compile} V=99 leave you?... attach the output or pastebin it .. also check if the new binary is created in builddir ..ede On 12.05.2011 16:08, John Zavgren wrote: > It get's built and staged when I do a "global" make. > > I want

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How does one build just one KLM?

2011-05-12 Thread edgar . soldin
welcome.. you could also manually remove builddir. buildroot is putting files in builddir (.prepared and the like). this is to circumvent to prepare,rebuild,install something again (e.g. when recompile an image with one added pkg added in menuconfig). keep that in mind and you are set for your

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] initial 2.6.39 support for brcm47xx

2011-05-24 Thread edgar . soldin
On 24.05.2011 20:03, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > P.S. > Please, don't top post :) why shouldn't he? it's not like you couldn't understand his message, is it? ..ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailm

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] initial 2.6.39 support for brcm47xx

2011-05-24 Thread edgar . soldin
On 24.05.2011 21:03, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > 2011/5/24 : >> On 24.05.2011 20:03, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> P.S. >>> Please, don't top post :) >> >> why shouldn't he? it's not like you couldn't understand his message, is it? > > That's posting style that was decided to be used for most open-source >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] initial 2.6.39 support for brcm47xx

2011-05-24 Thread edgar . soldin
On 24.05.2011 21:12, Peter Wagner wrote: > i think its more about - he asks me in a polite way not to toppost :) > and if someone asks in a nice way - you can see what you can get ;) he did indeed. probably i just overreact on this. it's like somebody is telling how to talk (in which order)... i

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] initial 2.6.39 support for brcm47xx

2011-05-27 Thread edgar . soldin
works for me on a asus wl-500w. thanks, ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Make package foo conflict with /replace package bar

2011-06-12 Thread edgar . soldin
On 10.06.2011 08:43, harish badrinath wrote: > Hello, > If i have a package called foo, How do it specify in its Makefile > (package/foo/Makefile) that it conflicts with / replaces a package > called bar. When that happens the compilation is aborted until package > bar is deselected. > > try wha

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Make package foo conflict with /replace package bar

2011-06-12 Thread edgar . soldin
On 12.06.2011 10:59, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: > On 10.06.2011 08:43, harish badrinath wrote: >> Hello, >> If i have a package called foo, How do it specify in its Makefile >> (package/foo/Makefile) that it conflicts with / replaces a package >> called bar. When that happens the compilation is abo

[OpenWrt-Devel] cts 0.2 stable & geomconv 0.3rc2 released

2011-06-28 Thread edgar . soldin
continuing my daily release cycle here comes CTS (coordinate transfomation services) Extension, stable until proven otherwise, translated into english, german, spanish, italian Geometry Converter Extension 0.3rc2 fixing a bug where it simply did nothing if an older version of my other extension

[OpenWrt-Devel] Please ignore: cts 0.2 stable & geomconv 0.3rc2 released

2011-06-28 Thread edgar . soldin
... sorry again ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

<    1   2