Re: State of APK package manger integration - switch on Monday!

:07, Paul Spooren wrote: > > Hi all, > > Thanks to some extra shifts from fellow developers and temporary building > capacity sponsored by some awesome communities, we made good progress! > > Starting with f72879d[1] and following commits we fixed up most the remaining > (

OpenWrt meeting November 2024

Hi, we had another meeting, please find the meeting notes below, in the wiki[1] or in the forum[2]. [1]: https://openwrt.org/meetings/20241126 [2]: https://forum.openwrt.org/t/openwrt-meeting-november-2024/216703 Please have a nice day, Paul ## OpenWrt One Status Update - The platform now supp

Re: Attended Sysupgrade Server CVE-2024-54143

Hey again, The security researcher published an article describing the details, a good read indeed. https://flatt.tech/research/posts/compromising-openwrt-supply-chain-sha256-collision/ Best, Paul > On 6. Dec 2024, at 23:42, Christian Marangi (Ansuel) > wrote: > > Forwarding this also to de

Re: OpenWrt 24.10.0-rc5 - Fifth release candidate

Hi, >>> I'm seeing some of the docker containers have not been built, even though >>> the imagebuilders have been available on downloads for at least a day. This >>> is causing all of ASU server's clients to fail for these targets. My test >>> case: I meant to write a blogpost on the infrastru

Re: [VOTE] OpenWrt Two

+1 The more the merrier > On 12. Feb 2025, at 18:46, John Crispin wrote: > > Hi, > > starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development of > OpenWrt "Two". > > "Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following > upgrades. > > * MT7988 > * 10G SFP >

State of OpenWrt wiki and alternatives

Hi all, I’m writing here since the topic is not only administratively but concerns developers, too. Historically openwrt.org was managed by two kind administrators which (to my knowledge) moved on to other things. The website is based on DokuWiki and is now in a semi ideal state, a bunch of AI

Re: [VOTE] OpenWrt Two

Hi all, > starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development of > OpenWrt "Two". This vote is open until the 05.03 (3 weeks total), if you’re a project member, please take part!. I’ll conclude this vote on that day and add it to the wiki. Sunshine, Paul signature.asc Desc

Re: Packages buildbot has several workers out of disk space

Hi, I don’t actively maintain those servers but instead made the contact so the buildbot admin team could take care. I’m guessing they are busy, so I cleared up some storage and restarted the service. Let’s hope this doesn’t happen again… Best, Paul > On 25. Feb 2025, at 21:03, Hannu Nyman wr

Re: [VOTE] OpenWrt Two

Hi, I summed things up and this vote got accepted - surprise :) https://openwrt.org/voting/2025-02-12-openwrt-two All right John, please make this happen. Best, Paul > On 26. Feb 2025, at 22:35, Rich Brown wrote: > > +1 Thank you. > >> On Feb 12, 2025, at 1:44 PM, John Crispin wrote: >>

Re: State of OpenWrt wiki and alternatives

or you patience, Paul > On 17. Feb 2025, at 13:37, Paul Spooren wrote: > > Hi all, > > I’m writing here since the topic is not only administratively but concerns > developers, too. > > Historically openwrt.org was managed by two kind administrators which (to my

Re: [VOTE] OpenWrt Two

inactive member handling. Sunshine, Paul > On 17. Mar 2025, at 17:25, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Wed, 2025-02-26 at 21:08 +0000, Paul Spooren wrote: >> Hi all, >> >>> starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the >>> development of OpenWr

<    2   3   4   5   6   7