On 30/11/2018 00:48, Mathias Kresin wrote:
29/11/2018 14:25, Florian Eckert:
Enable mtd led trigger for lantiq devices by default to show MTD
activity
Hi,
this is a very specific feature and I dont see any devices in tree using
the driver. it'll increase the image size and we have several s
On 28/11/2018 20:07, Jonathan Thibault wrote:
This is a very simple patch that completes sysupgrade functionality on UBNT
ER8.
Default layout leaves about 128MB free on the kernel partition so there is
plenty of space for temporary config backups.
Hi Jonathan,
ordering looks correct, however y
On 28/11/2018 17:59, Jonathan Thibault wrote:
Greetings,
Next in my series of 'OpenWRT as a network swiss army knife' patches, I
suggest having the ability to accept/drop frames with TC as part of
sched-core. This can be useful in cases where you need very fast (if
simplistic) packet filtering
On 01/12/2018 17:46, Christian Lamparter wrote:
On Wednesday, November 28, 2018 8:48:14 AM CET Petr Štetiar wrote:
I wanted to add status LEDs support to my imx6 based board and have found out,
that I could use diag.sh script found in ramips platform, which seems to be
also shared in a few othe
On 15/10/2018 23:24, Sven Roederer wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2018, 19:34:35 CEST schrieb Sven Roederer:
tools/firmware-utils/src/mksercommfw.c depends on the zip-tool to generate
the firmwareimage.
Thinking of this again, I wonder if it would be the proper way to build the
zip-tool as
On 03/12/2018 09:37, Florian Eckert wrote:
Hello John
this is a very specific feature and I dont see any devices in tree
using the driver. it'll increase the image size and we have several
small flashed units in the target. cant you simplly make it AutoProbe
during preinit ? there is next to
On 03/12/2018 16:56, Petr Štetiar wrote:
Hi,
I'm just going through the oldest PRs on GitHub, and I've noticed, that ath79
submissions are being more preferred between maintainers and that ar71xx PRs
are basically stalled, there are 24 open PRs for ar71xx Vs 14 open PRs for
ath79. So I'm wonder
On 03/12/2018 19:04, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
(openwrt-adm dropped from this subthread)
Em 03/12/2018 15:29, Stijn Segers escreveu:
Op ma, 3 dec 2018 om 5:51 , schreef John Crispin :
The idea was to fade out ar71xx after the next release and only accept
new boards for ath79
On 03/12/2018 19:50, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Apparently I was working on outdated information (likely from the
early days of ath79). Likely I got it from the ML archive or an older
forum post. Sorry about the noise (and happy it is supposed to just
work!).
all cool, this is wha
On 03/12/2018 23:56, Daniel Santos wrote:
On 11/24/18 8:05 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
On 10/19/18 10:59 AM, Daniel Santos wrote:
[snip]
We would like to reduce the number of patches we ship in OpenWrt on top
of the mainline Linux kernel.
Please send this to the upstream Maintainer of the jffs
On 04/12/2018 22:59, Michael Heimpold wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently playing with USB gadget stuff. The goal is to run an Ethernet
link and a console over the USB link. I already selected the relevant kernel
modules and ACM device and RNDIS device is created on the USB host
system - all fine so far.
On 05/12/2018 03:52, Yousong Zhou wrote:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 06:00, Michael Heimpold wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently playing with USB gadget stuff. The goal is to run an Ethernet
link and a console over the USB link. I already selected the relevant kernel
modules and ACM device and RNDIS device is
On 05/12/2018 07:42, Michael Heimpold wrote:
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 5. Dezember 2018, 03:52:20 CET schrieb Yousong Zhou:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 06:00, Michael Heimpold wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently playing with USB gadget stuff. The goal is to run an
Ethernet
link and a console over the USB link. I alr
ss
device due to blockd incorrectly reporting it as mounted.
please update the description before pushing
Acked-by: John Crispin
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On 07/12/2018 09:39, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 2018-12-07 04:41, Yousong Zhou wrote:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 20:42, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
From: Rafał Miłecki
This new function imlements common code needed to run /etc/hotplug.d/
listeners. It allows specifying subsystem and environment strings a
], argv[3], TYPE_AUTOFS);
or not ?!
regardless ...
Acked-by: John Crispin
}
- return mount_action(argv[2], argv[3], TYPE_AUTOFS);
}
static int find_block_mtd(char *name, char *part, int plen)
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
open
Hi,
so many mails in this thread. does anyone feel destined to summarize
this in an impartial manner ?
my superficial understanding is that some/few people do have
understandable doubts but alot of people understand that the trade-off
is quite high and it does only effect >5% of devices ?!?
On 07/12/2018 11:11, Hattink, Tjalling wrote:
-Original Message-
From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
On Behalf Of Jo-Philipp Wich
Sent: Friday, December 7, 2018 10:51
To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] procd: remove
fixes handling messages with "autofs" set to 0. They were
incorrectly interpreted due to the missing blobmsg_get_u32().
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
nice catch !
Acked-by: John Crispin
---
blockd.c | 16 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --g
On 10/12/2018 16:47, Piotr Dymacz wrote:
Hi Christian,
On 09.12.2018 16:34, Christian Lamparter wrote:
It allows specifying default and Netgear parsers directly in the DT.
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter
---
.../linux/generic/files/drivers/mtd/mtdsplit/mtdsplit_fit.c | 6 ++
1 file
On 05/12/2018 07:05, robinson wrote:
When I tried to add a led timer tirgger in "target/linux/ramips/base-files/
etc/board.d/01_leds" like below
ucidef_set_led_timer "system" "system" "zhuotk:green:system" "1000" "1000"
it will be failed to add value to "delayon" and "delayoff". This commit fix
On 06/12/2018 16:25, Jonathan Thibault wrote:
This is a very simple patch that completes sysupgrade functionality on UBNT
ER8.
Default layout leaves about 128MB free on the kernel partition so there is
plenty of space for temporary config backups.
Hi Jonathan,
the content of the patches is c
I'd like to review your patch but it hits the ML as an attachment making
it impossible. regardless, the subject is misleading, there are lots of
phy types and i fail to understand why this is required.
John
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
open
On 09/12/2018 22:54, Michael Heimpold wrote:
This is a trial to make it more obvious what the historically
grown code is actually doing.
Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold
---
V2: use Jo-Philipp Wich's proposal
inittab.c | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 17/12/2018 23:18, Dave Taht wrote:
Rosen Penev writes:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 4:54 PM Dave Taht wrote:
A pretty deep look at home MIPS and arm routers, and a surprising
bug in Linux/MIPS - by mudge and co:
https://cyber-itl.org/2018/12/07/a-look-at-home-routers-and-linux-mips.html
I
Hi Florian,
merged into the fw3 repo. i did not update the package in lede yet.
first want to talk to jow if current head of that repo is production ready.
John
On 02/09/2016 04:10, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Rename to fw3_{set,del,has}bit to avoid name clashes with sys/param.h:
>
> /opt
On 28/09/2016 01:26, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi Luka,
>
>> GitHub proved to be convinient in attracting easier collaboration. I'm
>> wondering what the community thinks about this proposal. Thoughts?
>
> If there is a decision to put those projects on Github I'd like to not
> have them under t
Hi,
this seems to be a backport for the kernel tree. please resend it as a
patch adding the actual patch that is being backported to the generic
targets patch folder. this would need to be done for 3.18, 4.1 and 4.4
John
On 23/09/2016 10:35, Michal Marek wrote:
> Special characters are p
Hi Luka,
On 10/11/2016 01:23, Luka Perkov wrote:
> cache for a period of time some arbitrary (runtime) data.
sounds interesting ... procd provides this feature already for managed
services. please explain some of the use cases and why you think that
existing feature set is not sufficient. also pl
Hi,
a slightly more elaborate description might be appropriate here
John
On 08/11/2016 16:39, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> Also sending the eject command to LUN 1 is required for some D-Link devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg
> Signed-off-by: René van Weert
> ---
> switch.c | 6
On 22/12/2016 09:36, David Lang wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:29 PM, David Lang wrote:
>>> On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Kathy Giori wrote:
>>>
From a PR perspective, I strongly suggest keeping the term OpenWrt as
part of the branding of the pro
On 22/12/2016 09:40, David Lang wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
>> - While brands have value, you can change a name without losing all the
>> brand recognition. I'm thinking here of cases like XBMC->Kodi or
>> OpenOffice->LibreOffice.
>
> I would point at OpenOffice ->
On 22/12/2016 09:42, David Lang wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote:
>
>>> Yes, the name is pointing at a product that doesn't exist any longer,
>>> but Deb and Ian aren't involved with Debian any longer either. At some
>>> point the fact
On 22/12/2016 09:58, David Lang wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote:
>
>> On 22/12/2016 09:42, David Lang wrote:
>>> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Yes, the name is pointing at a product that doesn't exist any
On 22/12/2016 16:57, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:58:22 -0800 (PST)
> David Lang wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote:
>
>>> claiming that there is only one option and no alternatives is just
>>> not constructive and wont lea
On 27/12/2016 01:07, Martin Tippmann wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
>> On 12/26/2016 08:05 AM, Martin Tippmann wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Denys Vlasenko
>>> So TL;DR: procd is fine for init but having runit/runsvdir easily
>>> usable would be a nice
On 28/12/2016 01:16, Martin Tippmann wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 9:43 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> currently procd service restart/reload can be triggered by config
>> changes and network interface changes. from what i understand you are
>> missing
On 16/01/2017 12:42, Daniel Golle wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:08:57AM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 04:06:25AM +0100, Daniel Golle wrote:
>>> From: Claudio Mignanti
>>>
>>> This is needed for devices without support for PCI MWI. See also
>>> https://
On 22/01/2017 01:42, TheWerthFam wrote:
> When trying to debug startup scripts its useful to see if the service
> triggers are properly registered.
> cheers
> Derek
> ___
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists
On 08/02/2017 15:55, Alin Năstac wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> One of the daemons I use takes sometime a couple of seconds to close
> after receiving SIGTERM, so when I issue "/etc/init.d/mydaemon
> restart" there will be 2 instances of that service running in parallel
> until the initial instance will
Hi,
i know that someone else is about to send a fix for the same issue but
with a different approach of fixing it. i'd like to wait for this 2nd
patch to arrive before we decide which to merge
John
On 09/02/2017 11:02, Alin Nastac wrote:
> SIGKILL is sent if instance process is still run
On 24/02/2017 10:26, Alin Nastac wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alin Nastac
Hi,
can you write a little more info as to why this is needed and what
scenario this fixes/changes ?
John
> ---
> service/service.c | 5 -
> service/service.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deleti
On 24/02/2017 11:21, Alin Năstac wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:53 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>> can you write a little more info as to why this is needed and what
>> scenario this fixes/changes ?
>
> 1) root@OpenWrt:~# uci show system.
Hi,
Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and
discussed the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we
would like to propose and have people vote on.
*) branding
- the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand
- a (minor) majority voted for ope
On 08/05/17 15:29, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 15:19 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
*) mailing list
- ask david to add the openwrt-adm and openwrt lists
- announce the switch to the infradead serves, asking people to
unsubscribe if they have privacy issues with this
- import the
On 09/05/17 09:49, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 8 May 2017 at 15:19, John Crispin wrote:
*) domain
- transfer owner ship to SPI for openwrt.org and lede-project.org
(...)
*) SPI
- TBD post remerge
This is unclear to me. Are we postponing setting rules with SPI on how
they should manage domains
Hi,
here is a V2 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
people made into it, if anything is missing let me know.
John
*) branding
- the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand
- a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most
people s
On 22/05/17 11:02, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote:
*) branding
- the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand
- a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst
most people said they did not care
- as the last vote had a 100% ACK for a
On 22/05/17 11:39, Vincenzo Romano wrote:
I also agree to everything.
With am extra point.
2017-05-22 11:18 GMT+02:00 tapper :
*) SPI
- nominate a new liaison team (imre and john offer to do this, if anyone
else is interested let us know)
- inform SPI of the new liaisons, voters and project r
On 23/05/17 17:29, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
Hi John,
John Crispin wrote:
here is a V2 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the
comments people made into it, if anything is missing let me know.
[snip]
Please let us know when you'll start a final vote on this proposal, or
if you wa
On 23/05/17 22:42, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote:
Hi,
here is a V2 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
people made into it, if anything is missing let me know.
John
.
*) SPI
- nominate a new liaison team (imre and
heeft Imre Kaloz het volgende
geschreven:
Hi,
On 2017-05-22 03:10, John Crispin wrote:
On 22/05/17 11:02, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote:
*) branding
- the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand
- a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over
Hi,
here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the proposal
with many details will delay the remerge even more.
Ideally we manage to v
(resend, this time as plain text)
Hi,
here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the proposal
with many details will delay the remerge
On 29/05/17 10:39, Tom Psyborg wrote:
Compared to Flyspray, Trac is a nightmare to administer. It leaks
resources like a sieve and tends to slow down to a crawl under load.
Regards,
Jo
Could you be more specific? I don't see how can it leak resources.
About slow down, hav
On 29/05/17 12:11, Jamie Stuart wrote:
Hi,
First of all, I’m glad to hear the process of remerging LEDE with OpenWrt is
moving forward.
For what it’s worth, if prefer the LEDE name (it’s friendlier - ‘leddy’ - and
not tied to the name of an old router!)
However, it seems the consensus is tha
*) rules
- owrt will adopt the lede rules and voting system
ACK from me aswell.
*) branding
- the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand
- a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most
people said they did not care
- as the last vote had a 100% ACK for a
On 13/06/17 21:58, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/28/2017 11:56 PM, John Crispin wrote:
Hi,
here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering
Hi Zoltan,
actually its been 29 days since the domain transfer had been completed
and ownership has been set properly.
i already had a chat with some devs last week about what to do next,
people are all very busy with their daytime jobs at the moment and
starting on the next step does obviou
Hi,
during the openwrt-summit we held a meeting to discuss the next steps of
the remerge. We should vote on whether we want to implement the following
tasks.
* Mailing-lists
There shall be 3 lists. All other lists that existed before/after the
reboot shall be shutdown.
- #openwrt - all con
Hi,
could someone please help us with rebranding the lede landing page to an
openwrt colour/theme ? i would like to see this swithced over within the
next 7 days.
John
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.open
call really.
John
Thomas
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] Im
Auftrag von Thomas Endt
Gesendet: Samstag, 6. Januar 2018 18:06
An: 'John Crispin'; 'LEDE Development List'; 'LEDE Project
Administrati
Hi,
I would like to close all ~1000 un-handled patches from the last 3 years
and only keep stuff from the last 6 months. any problem with that ?
John
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin
Hi,
Please provide me with a dump of all mail addresses / names currently
subscribed s.T. we can setup the new ML and send out auto generated
invite mails.
John
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt
On 17/01/18 20:41, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
Hi,
This series will add support for microcode update on x86 targets,
in light of the recent security issues.
While other distributions use an early initramfs approach to update
the microcode as early as possible, in OpenWrt the earliest place
where we
On 09/02/18 13:20, Axel Neumann wrote:
Hello,
the 666 kernel patches [1,2,3] break the possibility for using an ip4ip6
tunnel interface as a fall back interface accepting ip4-in-ip6 tunneled
packets from any remote address. This works out of the box with any
normal (non-666-patched) 4.4 (and e
Hi,
the imgtecs pistachio target is apparently EOL'ed and there is no
support for it anymore. imgtec promised to maintain the target inside
our tree but with their current situation don't appear to be able to do
so in future. I'd like to drop the target ASAP.
John
___
On 02/02/18 08:29, csho...@thecshore.com wrote:
From: "Daniel F. Dickinson"
Buffer overflow condition can occur because vlan
device name is constructed from device name (size IFNAMSIZ)
plus the ASCII decimal representation of the vlan id plus
a dot, but the target can only be IFNAMSIZ.
Note
On 01/02/18 23:35, Tim Harvey wrote:
Tested on a Gateworks GW54xx
Tim Harvey (4):
kernel: add missing config symbols
imx6: add support for Linux 4.14
imx6: switch to kernel 4.14
imx6: remove support for 4.9
Hi,
karl and hauke posted some comments to the series. I've marked the w
Hi,
who can tell me the passwd please ? would be nice if we were able to
retweet stuff like the FF GSoC stuff
John
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On 14/02/18 08:35, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 9:27 AM, John Crispin <mailto:j...@phrozen.org>> wrote:
Hi,
who can tell me the passwd please ? would be nice if we were able
to retweet stuff like the FF GSoC stuff
I think in the worst-case you can
Hi,
whats on the critical todo list for the upcoming release ? i still have
a few minor things that I'll be adding shortly, apart from that I am
currently not aware of any huge problems. the release will be a mix
between 4.9 and 4.14 afaik !?
John
On 14/08/17 12:02, Daniele Palmas wrote:
This patch adds support for UIM Get Card Status request
Signed-off-by: Daniele Palmas
---
Hi Daniele,
sorry for the late reply, nitpicks inline, if you could fix those and
resend the patch please ..
John
commands-uim.c | 143 +
Hi,
comments inline ...
On 18/02/18 04:36, Tobias Schramm wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tobias Schramm
---
uclient-http.c | 41 -
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/uclient-http.c b/uclient-http.c
index 36e051b..2a3cf5d 100644
---
On 18/02/18 04:36, Tobias Schramm wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tobias Schramm
---
uclient-fetch.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/uclient-fetch.c b/uclient-fetch.c
index 6961d94..46f9b3d 100644
--- a/uclient-fetch.c
+++ b/uclient-fetch.c
@@ -122,6 +122,11 @@ static int ope
On 18/02/18 04:36, Tobias Schramm wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tobias Schramm
looks good, but the caller should honour the return value aswell
John
---
uclient-http.c | 9 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/uclient-http.c b/uclient-http.c
index ef8de98
On 18/02/18 04:36, Tobias Schramm wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tobias Schramm
---
uclient-utils.c | 8 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/uclient-utils.c b/uclient-utils.c
index a375eea..ee0f8e8 100644
--- a/uclient-utils.c
+++ b/uclient-utils.c
@@ -177,8 +177,1
On 18/02/18 04:36, Tobias Schramm wrote:
Hi,
this series of patches adds some code to handle memory allocation failures
without crashing.
Previously a lot of memory allocations were not checked for NULL ptrs
resulting in nullpointer dereferences if (lib)uclient ran out of memory
Regards
Tob
On 17/02/18 13:33, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
On 02/15/2018 05:34 PM, Tim Harvey wrote:
Backport of: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/860701/
Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey
---
.../generic/pending-4.14/812-pci-dwc-fix-enumeration.patch| 11 +++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
creat
On 17/02/18 13:30, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
On 02/15/2018 05:34 PM, Tim Harvey wrote:
Testted on a Gateworks GW54xx. Does not support enabling imx-drm modules
yet as those will need some adjustments based on kernel configs.
v3:
- included missing patch for pcie enumeration fix
v2:
- move dw
On 18/02/18 16:35, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
On 02/18/2018 12:35 PM, John Crispin wrote:
On 17/02/18 13:30, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
On 02/15/2018 05:34 PM, Tim Harvey wrote:
Testted on a Gateworks GW54xx. Does not support enabling imx-drm modules
yet as those will need some adjustments based on
On 18/02/18 22:43, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
The next OpenWrt release will use kernel 4.9 and kernel 4.14 depending
on the target. All targets that are *not* on either kernel 4.9 or 4.14
will not be included in the next release.
I did some overview of the kernel version some months ago here:
http:
On 19/02/18 09:12, Lucian Cristian wrote:
On 19.02.2018 08:41, John Crispin wrote:
On 18/02/18 22:43, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
The next OpenWrt release will use kernel 4.9 and kernel 4.14 depending
on the target. All targets that are *not* on either kernel 4.9 or 4.14
will not be included in
be looking for a replacement because I'll stay on 4.9
forever?
Best regards,
Maciej
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 7:41 AM, John Crispin <mailto:j...@phrozen.org>> wrote:
On 18/02/18 22:43, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
The next OpenWrt release will use kernel 4.9 and kerne
On 18/02/18 13:46, Tobias Schramm wrote:
Add some error handling for errors during assembly of headers
Signed-off-by: Tobias Schramm
Hi,
3 nitpicks inline ...
---
uclient-http.c | 32
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ucli
On 18/02/18 13:46, Tobias Schramm wrote:
Hi John,
I've implemented the suggested improvements and performed some more
reformatting to match the codestyle of uclient more closely.
Regards
Tobias Schramm
Hi Tobias,
merged most of them alread, please fix/resend 4/7 and 6/7
John
Chang
On 20/02/18 09:15, Daniele Palmas wrote:
Hi John,
2018-02-18 10:44 GMT+01:00 John Crispin :
On 14/08/17 12:02, Daniele Palmas wrote:
This patch adds support for UIM Get Card Status request
Signed-off-by: Daniele Palmas
---
Hi Daniele,
sorry for the late reply, nitpicks inline, if you
On 16/03/18 19:48, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Hi,
i just finished writing a detailed blog post regarding how to use
hardware watchdog and how to manually take control over from procd:
http://kernelreloaded.com/manually-controlling-openwrt-hardware-watchdog/
Over the years there were few questions
On 12/04/18 12:42, Kristian Evensen wrote:
Hello,
I have recently updated some ramips mt7621-devices (ZBT WG3526) to the
latest nightly. Almost everything seems to work fine, but using either
wifi interface in client mode seems triggers an oops. I see two
different oops-messages:
Message 1:
[
On 17/04/18 00:34, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 2018-04-15 20:22, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 2018-04-14 20:36, Hans Ulli Kroll wrote:
Hi Roman
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Roman Yeryomin
wrote:
> I have tested them quickly yesterday on nas4220b bo
On 29/04/18 20:32, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 2018-04-27 09:18, John Crispin wrote:
On 17/04/18 00:34, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 2018-04-15 20:22, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 2018-04-14 20:36, Hans Ulli Kroll wrote:
Hi Roman
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12
On 30/04/18 19:08, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Hello,
I have been playing with a ZyXEL WAP6805, which appears to be an OEM
version of the https://wikidevi.com/wiki/ZyXEL_WAP6806_(Armor_X1)
This thing has an oversized mini-PCIe Quantenna module. Or that's the
mechanical form factor. The connection bet
On 05/05/18 12:27, Jaap Buurman wrote:
Hi all,
I feel like everybody is just waiting for everybody to agree what
features we want in before coming up with the next step of picking a
date. Obviously this isn't working out very well. Why not turn things
around? Pick a date in a few weeks time on
On 19/05/18 02:41, Eneas U de Queiroz via openwrt-devel wrote:
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing lis
On 19/05/18 16:14, Christo Nedev wrote:
Why? Because old one does not boot for Pi 3 b and Pi 3 b+. It is very old as
well!
please write a proper description
John
Signed-off-by: Christo Nedev
---
package/kernel/brcm2708-gpu-fw/Makefile | 30 +-
target/li
On 19/05/18 17:38, Christo Nedev wrote:
usb0 interface is used by USB-to-ethernet adapters or
smartph
one
tethering , and they need drivers to work. Just
adding the interface does
not have any effect.
Do you mean these drivers -> kmod-usb-net kmod-usb-net-cdc-ether
kmod-usb-net-rndis?
On 19/05/18 19:10, Christo Nedev wrote:
when resending all your now properly annotated patches, please make sure
to send them as a series clearly marked as V2.
John
Signed-off-by: Christo Nedev
---
target/linux/brcm2708/bcm2708/config-4.14 | 385 ++
target/li
On 18/05/18 16:07, Pierre Lebleu wrote:
In order to give some extra options (specific to the filesystem used),
a new CMake option (eg: CMAKE_OVL_MOUNT_OPTION) has been added.
Example: cmake -DCMAKE_OVL_MOUNT_OPTION="compr=zlib"
Signed-off-by: Pierre Lebleu
---
CMakeLists.txt | 6
On 18/05/18 16:07, Pierre Lebleu wrote:
In order to customize the mount flags, a new CMake option
(eg: CMAKE_OVL_MOUNT_FLAGS) has been added.
Example: cmake -DCMAKE_OVL_MOUNT_FLAGS="MS_RELATIME"
Signed-off-by: Pierre Lebleu
---
CMakeLists.txt | 6 ++
libfstools/overlay.c | 2 +-
On 22/05/18 16:18, Kristian Evensen wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 10:26 PM, Rosen Penev wrote:
Bisecting further is hard, since the
commit is a combination of (a lot of) clean-up and some functional
changes.
Changes can be viewed on the linux-next tree. It should be as simple
as dropping in
801 - 900 of 2219 matches
Mail list logo
