[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Update Busybox To Version 1.19.2

2011-09-21 Thread Jason Self
Signed-off-by: Jason Self Index: package/busybox/Makefile === --- package/busybox/Makefile(revision 28282) +++ package/busybox/Makefile(working copy) @@ -8,14 +8,14 @@ include $(TOPDIR)/rules.mk PKG_NAME:=busybox

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] LibreWRT introduction & patch

2010-07-20 Thread Jason Self
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 10:45 +0200, : > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:49:19 -0300, > wrote: > > > It would be great if some OpenWRT developer could review it and send > some > > feedback about the inclusion of this patch; probably there are things to > be > > solved or improved before inclusion, so it wo

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] LibreWRT introduction & patch

2010-07-20 Thread Jason Self
> I'm not a member of that list, so I cannot copy that list. Sorry for the earlier message. I accidentally hit the wrong keyboard shortcut, and sent an incomplete message. Anyway: Just FYI that the LibreWRT mailing list does accept posts by non-members (they're held for moderation to avoid spam.)

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] LibreWRT introduction & patch

2010-07-26 Thread Jason Self
ralph.hem...@lantiq.com wrote: > ... I would appreciate this solution. > This makes it much more easy for us to create free SDK's. > > By default the Package License should be GPL. Only non GPL packages will > add the additional License information to their feeds Makefiles ? Just to be clear, the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] LibreWRT introduction & patch

2010-07-26 Thread Jason Self
ralph.hem...@lantiq.com wrote: > ... I would appreciate this solution. > This makes it much more easy for us to create free SDK's. > > By default the Package License should be GPL. Only non GPL packages will > add the additional License information to their feeds Makefiles ? Just to be clear, the