in main.lua for nil options but it just sets a
message and continues, causing the above error later on. Adding a
return statement after setting the message causes the interface to at
least not die.
Signed-off-by: Bob Ham
---
luci-app-bmx6/files/usr/lib/lua/luci/model/cbi/bmx6/main.lua | 3
status and why? Is
the responsibly party on this list and if so, could you explain?
Without understanding why this patch is "Not applicable" I can't
determine how to proceed with further development.
Kind regards,
Bob Ham
___
openw
On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 11:03 +0100, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> * Bob Ham [12.02.2016 11:00]:
> > now has the state of "Not applicable" but there are no comments and it
> > doesn't say who changed the status.
>
> what I see is, that
> 'luci-app-bmx6/files/
e openwrt-routing feed which is managed from another group of
> volunteers. Plese, visit https://github.com/openwrt-routing
>
> Your contribution seems to be applicable, so it will be probably
> approved. Thanks.
>
> Cheers.
>
> On 12/02/16 10:24, Bob Ham wrote:
>
On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 18:07 +0100, Pau wrote:
> this package is part
> of the openwrt-routing feed which is managed from another group of
> volunteers. Plese, visit https://github.com/openwrt-routing
PS, I note that this "OpenWrt Routing Organisation" lists
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org as its e
GitHub
but also without having to monitor the main, high-volume openwrt-devel
mailing list.
I've CC'd the openwrt-devel list again in this email as I would expect
the administrators of openwrt.org will be present and I hope they might
be willing to chime i
ur patch. I
> never refused this option, the pull request is just more confortable.
>
> On 13 febrer de 2016 1:09:38 CET, Bob Ham wrote:
> >On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 20:52 +0100, Pau wrote:
> >> Please, fork the project in github and send a pull request. This is
> >the
>
