Re: [PATCH] imagebuilder: add package signature verification

Hi, Thanks for the patch, it looks good but comments below: On 25-08-20, Paul Spooren wrote: > The ImageBuilder downloads pre-built packages and adds them to images. > This process uses `opkg` which has the capability to verify package list > signatures, as enabled per default on running OpenWrt

HTTPS performance issue with opkg (Was: [PATCH 3/3] build: switch VERSION_REPO to HTTPS)

the current situation is acceptable for a stable release, if only to avoid high load on the download server. Baptiste > Suggested-by: Petr Štetiar > Suggested-by: Baptiste Jonglez > Signed-off-by: Paul Spooren > --- > include/version.mk | 2 +- > package/ba

Regressions in 19.07.4

Hi, FYI, there have been several regressions reported in 19.07.4: https://openwrt.org/releases/19.07/notes-19.07.4#regressions The third one (instability/reboot on ramips) might be a kernel issue, devices from different ramips subtargets are affected. Other than that, feedback has been positi

[PATCH 18.06] ar71xx: mikrotik: bypass id check in __rb_get_wlan_data()

ever stored with the new "LZOR" encoding scheme found on some ath10k devices. Signed-off-by: Thibaut VARÈNE (cherry picked from commit 1c6990fe6d198718850b6a37998416cac69f6f53) [keep publishing ath10k caldata in sysfs: it's the way it's done on 18.06] Signed-off-by: Baptiste Jonglez

Re: [PATCH] ath79: ar8216: make switch register access atomic

Hi, Thanks a lot for fixing this! Can you backport it to openwrt-19.07? ath79 is also affected there. Regards, Baptiste On 21-09-20, Chuanhong Guo wrote: > reg accesses on integrated ar8229 sometimes fails. As a result, phy read > got incorrect port status and wan link goes down and up mysteri

[OpenWrt-Devel] AA: IPv6 bug on TP-Link TL-WR841N v8 (patch available)

Hi, There is a bug in AA regarding IPv6 multicast support for the AR9341 switch (at least on a TP-Link TL-WR841N v8 device). Basically, it breaks IPv6 Neighbour Discovery, which seriously limits IPv6 functionality. See this ticket: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/15448 In particular, a patch

Re: [VOTE] OpenWrt Two

Hi, On 12-02-25, John Crispin wrote: > Hi, > > starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development of > OpenWrt "Two". Sorry for the late reply. +1 for me, looks nice! However, it's much more expensive than the One, so I hope we can keep producing/supporting the One for peop

<    1   2   3