Merged into master at
http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git.
Thank you!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
> why is the rrdns located under luci?
because its a rpcd plugin provided by LuCI, hosted in the LuCI repo and
used by LuCI.
> Can we make it consistent place rrdns somewhere else?
Should be doable.
> Furthermore we should change the Makefile of rpcd and the cmakefile that
> rrdns ist list
Hi,
> diff --git a/system.c b/system.c
> index 151f613..87ce2da 100644
> --- a/system.c
> +++ b/system.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ static int system_board(struct ubus_context *ctx, struct
> ubus_object *obj,
>
> if (!strcasecmp(key, "system type") ||
>
Hi,
the functionality seems arbitrary and overly specific to your use case,
also the option name "alias" does not really explain the effects of
setting this option.
IMHO you rather should write/ship a custom /etc/hotplug.d/iface/ script
which deals with downing the fallback alias interface when t
Hi,
whats the complete dnsmasq cmdline?
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi Kristian,
does the same happen without "bind-dynamic" ? My hunch is that dnsmasq
fails to "resubscribe" to the socket after the ifindex of br-lan changed
due to the network restart (which will destroy and recreate br-lan).
Maybe netlink congestion or something related to privilege dropping? Ca
And how did you came to trust the LEDE 17 key in the first place?
~ Jo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
> Add a basic variant which provides WPA-PSK only, 802.11r and 802.11w.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
Acked-by: Jo-Philipp Wich
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.or
Hi,
> From: Mathias Kresin
>
> Add out of the box support for 802.11r and 802.11w to all targets not
> suffering from small flash.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathias Kresin
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
Acked-by: Jo-Philipp Wich
__
Hi,
because they don't build since that date anymore.
~ Jo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi Etienne,
I would like that. The auto-close message should be mentioned that this
closure marks not a rejection and that a user is free to reopen a
rebased PR if he still wants it to go in.
Regards,
Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
Hi Hannu,
yes - without any dependency tweaking (e.g. by introducing conditionals
like you suggested) a given source package build-depends on the union of
all dependencies of all binary packages declared by the source package.
The only way to mitigate that is using conditional dependencies in the
Hi,
> I'm not sure what you mean by the images being reproducible.
It means that different mksquashfs runs with different amounts of CPUs
on different hosts should yield bit-identical images having the same
checksum given the same input.
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signat
Hi,
what is the size increase in kmod-ext4 due to this?
~ Jo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
> This is a trial to make it more obvious what the historically
> grown code is actually doing.
when we already refactor the code...
> Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold
> ---
> inittab.c | 9 -
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/inittab.c b/inittab.c
arameter is not.
> As this logic is in place to mimic the old shell script based firewall
> behavior for DNAT only set port_redir in case the redirect rule is
> a DNAT rule.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Dedecker
Acked-by: Jo-Philipp Wich
> ---
> redirects.c | 2 +-
> 1 f
Hi,
> Even standard Luci can be easily and significantly reduced in twice just
> by removing images and icons.
I don't think this is true. The few icons bundled with LuCI at are
approx 19KB overall while a recent mips 24kc snapshot build of luci-base
is 126KB in size. So the images account for le
Hi,
> At least for me that's the but another reason was to enable guest
> network (and BTW why Luci just don't have a single button for this?).
Because it has not been implemented yet. Adding the code for it would
probably consume another 5-10KB uncompressed.
> [...]
> Let's take for example Luc
Hi,
I had a brief discussion with John on this matter and was being told
that the reason for this filter was to optimize boot time.
When we remove the /dev filter, boot time will increase considerably on
lower end devices due to the resulting hotplug-call overhead of the huge
volume of additional
Hi,
> Just wondering if there are snapshots built for the backports etc
> done onto the 18.06 tree (e.g. in preparation for 18.06.2), or after
> release are there only adhoc builds for release candidates for the
> point release?
http://downloads.openwrt.org/releases/18.06-SNAPSHOT/
> If there ar
Hi,
I'm against rejecting such submissions if they're self-contained enough
(e.g. for DTS based targets as mentioned by Piotr).
I'd favor accepting the basic board support for such boards but
disabling the image generation (commented out).
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signa
Hi,
> It seems only Robert Call of the LibreCMC fork is consistently signing
> releases
> with the same key. But how is he verifying upstream...?
probably by trusting https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/security/signatures
I cross-signed the 18.06 key with the 17.01 one now and signed both
usi
Hi Hans,
> [...]
> +boot()
> +{
> + BOOT=1
> + start "@"
Typo here, should likely be "$@".
Otherwise Acked-by.
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://
Hi,
> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens
Acked-by: Jo-Philipp Wich
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens
Acked-by: Jo-Philipp Wich
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
pushed as
https://git.openwrt.org/c0248183a49a9830a4a2458e54e83fa8a3c646c9 after
some smoke testing on a QCA9882 (Netgear R6100)
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.
Hi,
> Why did you remove this dir?
To save space on the download servers.
> If we want to build custom binaries using SDK, should we use something else?
Use the feeds mechanism within the SDK to build your required libaries
first, e.g.:
./scripts/feeds update
./scripts/feeds install libpcap
m
Hi,
> I recently set up an OpenWrt 18.06.1 router at a place where the ISP
> does not provide native IPv6, but does provide their own 6to4
> tunnelling server. I installed 6to4 and ip-full on the router and
> configured WAN6, but was puzzled as to why IPv6 wasn't working until I
> discovered that
Hi,
personally I rarely visit Github PRs these days, any discussions going
on there (in issues or PRs) will likely get overlooked by most devs.
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lis
Hi,
comments inline.
> [...]
> + # partition - stateless, mdadm --assemble --scan
> --config=partition; see mdadm(8)
> + # uci - stateful, dynamically generated mdadm.conf via uci
> array values (below),
> + # stored in /var/etc/mdadm.conf
> + #
Hi,
> Remove patch 000-relocatable.patch as it seems to be no longer needed.
did you verify that the generated compile_et and make_cmds scripts are
installed without absolute paths in the host staging directory?
If not, then removing this path will result in very hard to debug SDK
build failures
Hi Reiner,
> After having several unpleasant encounters using sysupgrade, I had a
> quick glance at the code, after more or less successfully implementing
> workarounds for incomplete sysupgrades, resulting in inconsistent systems.
> My questions are:
> - Is it safe, simply to kill running process
Hi Joseph,
I've been thinking that we maybe should lower the STOP index even
further, to at least 90.
Apart from that the patch looks good.
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists
Hi,
its not about symlinks, its about the paths embedded in these generated
scripts.
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/o
Hi,
I lean towards enabling these features by default.
With the eventual switch to 4.19, most 4M boards will fall of the cliff
anyway.
Regards,
Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lis
Hi Daniel,
I am fine with adding a fakeroot solution.
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
your patch would disable the complete output if NO_COLOR is set. That
does not seem to meet the expected behavior.
Looks like the fallback path should still print $(1) to stderr, just
without ANSI escape sequences.
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Merged into openwrt-18.06 at
http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git.
Thank you!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
this patch should go through master first. It currently does not apply
there.
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/open
Hi,
as far as I know, the Gluon build system is performing various rather
invasive changes to the build system.
Please see if you can replicate the same behavior with a vanilla OpenWrt
build root.
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
Hi,
> That is true. But, on the other hand, the same routine was not printing
> anything if IS_TTY is not 1. I would say that this is unexpected
> behaviour too. If the log file shows some error, it would be nice to see
> what part was being processed.
this might be, but the scope of this patch w
Hi,
please share the exact steps used to trigger the issue. Running a simple
"make" after an initial build here does not trigger the recompilation of
uci or the kernel.
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel maili
Merged into my staging tree at
http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/staging/jow.git.
Thank you!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
unfortunately the tag has already been created and builds are running
are already running and uploading.
We can bump mt76 with the next point release in a few weeks.
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mai
The OpenWrt Community is proud to announce the second service release of
the stable OpenWrt 18.06 series.
OpenWrt 18.06.2 incorporates a fair number of bug fixes in the network
userland and the build system, as well as updates to the kernel and base
packages.
---
Some selected highlights of the
Hi Luka,
> GitHub proved to be convinient in attracting easier collaboration. I'm
> wondering what the community thinks about this proposal. Thoughts?
If there is a decision to put those projects on Github I'd like to not
have them under the OpenWrt project org but let the individual authors
host
Hi Sven,
pushed to iwinfo.git - thanks!
Will update it in LEDE master soon.
~ Jo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi David,
I did not personally attend but from a quick private talk with blogic it
sounded to me like there's been some constructive discussion in a calm
atmosphere that at least helped to clear up the status quo.
Hauke currently tries to organize a follow up conference call to further
discuss to
Hi Ralph,
pushed to http://git.lede-project.org/dd01372 - thank you!
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-d
Hi Ralph,
thanks - applied with minor code style change in 010723e.
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-de
Hi Ralph,
unfortunately this breaks building on a glibc system for me:
-- 8< --
$ make
[ 7%] Building C object CMakeFiles/firewall3.dir/iptables.c.o
In file included from /usr/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4.h:8:0,
from /usr/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h:21,
Hi Ralph,
I took the CMakeLists.txt change as-is but modified the rest to use
no-op declarations of init_extensions{,4,6}() in order to avoid
sprinkling too much ifdefs around.
Thanks,
Jo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
ht
Hi again,
> Will see if I find another solution...
I managed to find a solution that works for me on a Linux 4.6.0 system
with glibc, a Linux 4.6.0 system with unpatched musl and a Linux 4.4
system with patched kernel headers.
I pushed this change along with a few others that should aid in
porta
Hi Luka,
in rpcd there already is the ability to store arbitrarily nested
key-value data in the session namespace which is even persistent over
daemon reloads. Is this not sufficient? And if not, what is missing?
~ Jo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
open
On 11/08/2016 05:13 PM, Antonio Paunovic wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> recently there was a change in default UCI behaviour which you can
> see here:
>
>
http://git.openwrt.org/?p=project/uci.git;a=commit;h=df72af474075159ab79ed190d2109eb2d86709bf
>
> While change in implementation is minor, this m
Hi,
pushed with http://git.lede-project.org/9978a3e and added the missing
">" to the first S-o-b.
Thanks,
Jo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi Sven,
imho it is preferable to have usable, but inactive LEDs available by
default in the system configuration.
~ Jo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi Karl,
I think there is not much speaking against making the led init script
run earlier. I think it would make sense to have it START=11, right
after /etc/init.d/boot.
~ Jo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.
Hi Denys,
> Well, we certainly can fix the ntpd start scritps,
> but this is a generic problem, right? We'd want ANY
> daemons to be run "properly", with their output logged.
> With log size and location controlled. With log rotation.
> Etc. etc etc.
Controlling log rotation, sizes etc. is the ta
Hi Heinrich,
LEDE recently introduced PKG_HASH which accepts both SHA256 and MD5
sums, so in doubt simply declare both PKG_MD5SUM holding an md5 sum and
PKG_HASH holding the sha256 equivalent.
~ Jo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.open
Hi Tom,
> I'd vote for re-enabling trac for all users, instead of wasting time and
> resources on another flyspray instance or even existing one which
> compared to trac does not bring any breakthrough features.
Compared to Flyspray, Trac is a nightmare to administer. It leaks
resources like a si
Hi,
NACK from me - not that it makes a difference but I do not like to
operate under the OpenWrt name.
~ Jo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
comments inline.
> Signed-off-by: Imre Kaloz
Given the fact that we explicitely wanted to avoid @openwrt.org mails
and that this was one of the discussion points leading to the split I
find it delicate to seal the merging commit with exactly such a S-o-b.
Combined with ...
$ git log --a
Hi Baptiste,
first of all I think that is a great initiative!
> So, here is a RFC proposal of a new developer documentation based on
> git and Sphinx:
>
> https://files.polyno.me/openwrt/doc/index.html git clone
> git://git.polyno.me/openwrt-doc
The layout is okay and the ASCII markup looks rea
Hi,
following the agreed OpenWrt/LEDE re-merge procedure, we've replaced the
OpenWrt Git tree with the LEDE Git tree now and archived the old repository.
If you're working with older branches such as Chaos Calmer or Barrier
Breaker, you do have to update your remotes in order to continue to be
ab
Remove LEDE_GIT references in favor to the new name-agnostic
PROJECT_GIT variable.
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich
---
package/libs/librpc/Makefile | 2 +-
package/libs/libubox/Makefile| 2 +-
package/libs/uclient/Makefile| 2 +-
package/libs/ustream-ssl
Introduce a name-agnostic PROJECT_GIT variable poiting to
https://git.openwrt.org/ and declare LEDE_GIT and OPENWRT_GIT
as aliases to it.
After some transition time we can drop this alias variables.
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich
---
include/download.mk | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions
Hi,
I've been preparing some draft for a future landing page at
https://lede-project.org/openwrt.
Note that some of the linked pages are obviously still LEDE branded and
the links to IRC, lists, forum need to be expanded to point to both
OpenWrt and LEDE forums.
Maybe someone can pick up from he
Hi,
[...]
> diff --git a/scripts/package-metadata.pl b/scripts/package-metadata.pl
> index 980ad24dc0..41e7108322 100755
> --- a/scripts/package-metadata.pl
> +++ b/scripts/package-metadata.pl
> @@ -101,14 +101,16 @@ my %dep_check;
> sub __find_package_dep($$) {
> my $pkg = shift;
>
Hi Weedy,
can you provide some more context lines to see which package those broken
depends belong to?
Thanks,
Jo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi John, Alex,
I have no problem with closing / autorejecting open tickets in patchwork
as long as they somehow remain available for future reference.
> To add here. Would it be possible/desire-able to add an auto-timeout
> to patchwork & github PRs, issues to close after X time ? Maybe make
> it
Hi,
ACK from me as well.
> ACK to enable it for packages, not sure if it makes sense for core as we
> enforce this in the project git repo already, and Github is just a mirror.
It does make sense to provide immediate feedback on Github pull requests
I assume.
~ Jo
___
Merged into my staging tree at
http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/staging/jow.git.
Thank you!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
the mailing lists should be moved now;
lede-...@lists.infradead.org became openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
lede-...@lists.infradead.org became openwrt-...@lists.openwrt.org
those who've been subscribed to the LEDE lists should still be
subscribed as the subscription list has been kept throug
Hello David,
this was actually my fault. I didn't pay close attention and assumed the
code to be related to the kernel MTD subsystem. Only now after your mail
I realized that it affects the OpenWrt specific formatting utility.
I am very sorry for the confusion caused.
Kind regards,
Jo
SSL_library_init() and SSL_load_error_string() in
favor to calling OPENSSL_init_ssl() instead, so adjust the ustream
initalization to use either variant, depending on the OpenSSL version.
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich
---
ustream-io-openssl.c | 73
Hi,
> Is anyone looking into it?
I doubt it, unfortunately the info in the ticket is too vague to work
with. Personally I don't have any hardware to debug this.
~ Jo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.infradead
Hi,
> This does not make sense, is the alternative to write off openwrt?
> Because if ADSL + PPPoA do not work, then it is useless.
Indeed, if OpenWrt does not work for your device then you should look
for alternatives or try to dig into the issue yourself.
> As a minimum I would expect a devel
Hi Lev,
the patch was added to save space. Dropping it will increase the libc
size by a few kilobytes.
~ Jo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
please find code comments inline below.
Do you plan to extend the Lua binding as well?
Also I wonder what the intended use case of this change is...
(lib)iwinfo was once meant to provide a common uniform subset of
wireless information across different driver backends such as
proprietary wl,
Hi,
yes I'd prefer to see Lua bindings implemented for that.
~ Jo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi Yousong,
this change seems to introduce serious runtime regressions, see
https://bugs.openwrt.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=1621
It seems to be like that script does things even if the tarballs are
already existing locally.
On a slightly related note, I find the name to be too generic. It
Hi,
> It seems to be like that script does things even if the tarballs are
> already existing locally.
the main problem I see is that you moved the download method detection
from inline make code into the external Python script ... this will
cause a lot of overhead as during the metadata scanning
Hi,
> Looks like it's caused by the excessive python script call. This is
> indeed unexpected. I just pushed a commit to disable it altogether
> for now. Sorry for the inconvenience ;(
is there anything preventing you from doing a change like below to wire
in the github archiving script?
-- 8
> This patchset implements a way to add additional distfeeds.conf entries
> (src-dummy method), makes rootfs creation independent of feed enable
> status, and moves from global ADD_DISABLED and ADD_COMMENTED symbols to
> per-feed configuration.
Acked-by: Jo-
Hi,
comments inline.
On 07/13/2018 10:57 AM, Yury Shvedov wrote:
> diff --git a/include/iwinfo.h b/include/iwinfo.h
> index 929f697..c3c25ff 100644
> --- a/include/iwinfo.h
> +++ b/include/iwinfo.h
> @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ struct iwinfo_scanlist_entry {
> uint8_t signal;
> uint8_t quali
Hi,
comments inline.
~ Jo
> diff --git a/include/iwinfo.h b/include/iwinfo.h
> index c3c25ff..b1b39a1 100644
> --- a/include/iwinfo.h
> +++ b/include/iwinfo.h
> @@ -145,6 +145,24 @@ struct iwinfo_crypto_entry {
> uint8_t auth_suites;
> uint8_t auth_algs;
> };
> +struct iwinfo_channe
Hi,
works for me on Debian 9 und Ubuntu 18. I've got reports that it is
broken on Arch which I am currently trying to install but it seems to be
a pain
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openw
Hi again,
As a workaround, run the following command once within the IB/SDK directory:
sed -i -e 's,/\(usr\|lib\|etc\)/,/###/,g' ./staging_dir/host/lib/libc.so.6
This will prevent the bundled glibc from trying to dlopen() libraries on
the host system which is the root cause of the assertion.
~
Hi,
see https://bugs.openwrt.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=1693 - fixed
with https://git.openwrt.org/3ee2c76ae0 (https://git.openwrt.org/aa8846bb10)
Regards,
Jo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org
Hi,
maybe it would make sense to copy one of the standard boilerplate
liability remarks from one of the OSS licenses and put that as generic
statement into the wiki footer.
Example from Apache 2.0:
"Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License
Hi Koen,
> In function 'ath10k_dfs_radar_report':
> /mnt/ramdisk/koen/firmware/builds/generic_glmifi/build_dir/target-mips_24kc_musl/linux-ar71xx_generic/ath10k-ct-2018-05-30-127f9818/ath10k-4.13/wmi.c:3993:7:
> error: too few arguments to function 'ar->dfs_detector->add_pulse'
> if (!ar->dfs_de
Hi,
the string "Saving config files" is not occuring anywhere in the LuCI
source code. Seems it is emitted by a program that gets invoked when
configs get committed through libuci. Did you modify libuci or
luci.model.uci ?
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Whats the result if you run
grep -r "Saving config files" /
?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi,
git send-email support is provided by a separate package on .deb distros:
apt-get install git-email
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.o
Hi,
this chipset cannot support more than 7 clients in AP mode. Its a
limitation of the chip firmware.
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org
Hey Gui,
I think we can extract a few bits of entropy by using the MAC addresses,
should be easy to obtain them through getifaddrs().
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwr
Thats due to the varnish cache, it strips all incoming cookies for
non-authenticated users.
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/ma
Hi.
> Yes, I heard from other replies, that's good news, hope it will be
> ready for prime time soon.
>
> Still, it would be nice to have good unbloated language for rapid app
> development in constrained environments, like most routers on which
> OpenWRT runs. I made initial proof of concept web
Hi.
Profiles influence image generation and package selection but share all
a common kernel.
Subtargets are used if a different kernel is required.
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-dev
201 - 300 of 1348 matches
Mail list logo
