On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote:
you would be horrified to look under the covers of most linux based
appliances,
a lot of them are running a stock redhat/centos install with very
little
customization outside of the userspace app that they run. Gaping
security holes
in such a
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
* David Lang [23.03.2015 20:19]:
question is around having something to automatically assign channels
amoung the different APs to minimize interference between the APs and
between the APs and other things in the area.
we just use hostapd & a
I've never
seen a commercial system work well when there is really a load on the system
(i.e. conference or classroom environments)
David Lang
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, xxiao8 wrote:
Isn't CAPWAP designed for this?
xxiao
On 03/23/2015 07:42 PM, openwrt-devel-requ...@lists.openwrt.org wrote
they will just end up
connecting to a more remote AP (assuming there is one in range)
David Lang
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015, Janne Cederberg wrote:
Oh, sorry Bastian I forgot to comment on your suggestion earlier!
Question: how does that "constant" restarting affect network QoS/throughput?
nals when
planning for an event. I would love to be able to backstop my educated guesswork
with actual measurements to help me find problem spots.
David Lang
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
ng out what actions you can take are far from simple.
David Lang
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
+1
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 21:47:35 +0200
From: Hartmut Knaack
To: edgar.sol...@web.de,
OpenWrt Development List
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver
That Doodle poll turned out to be spamed/trolled, and everyone could even
change or del
On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Peter Lawler wrote:
On 08/04/15 05:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer "Dark Destroyer".
How does that even work? You're not giving an option to vote for
anything else.
There are three different subthreads, each looking for answers on
Are there any devices out there that support bonded DSL under openwrt?
David Lang
On Sat, 4 Dec 2021, Andre Heider wrote:
Hi,
On 03/12/2021 05:28, Andrew Punch wrote:
Hi,
I live in a small unit, so the usual advice to have a separate VDSL modem,
router and ATA isn't great space wise.
only sending some of it to the CPU
(the CPU would be a very significant bottleneck if I tried to send everything
though it)
David Lang
On Wed, 7 Sep 2022, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
Hi Rich,
that tutorial is good ground work imho. One thing I repeatedly noticed (not in
the document, but in forum an
ity was dissolved into a bunch of ethernet devices
> inside a bridge...
+1
One thing that we do need to show is what ethernet devices are on the switch,
there is a considerable CPU load to routing traffic through the processor vs
through the switch, so when people are deciding what ports to u
imple configurations, but much more complex configurations are
possible, and as people start using the power, the confusion of terms causes
problems)
David Lang
Network:
A network represents a group of computers communicating with each other.
Interface:
Short for network interface.
eople following those instructions, and they
need to either work, or give good information about what's going wrong.
David Lang
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
st. A good idea in the long run, but is
it really a requirement to start with?
David Lang
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Michael Richardson wrote:
{sorry for the long delay, been unwell}
Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Maybe it is possible to deploy the system with secure boot and a
> protected IDevId key by default, but allowing the user/owner to erase
> the key and disable secure boot? This
If nothing else, there is support for new hardware all the time.
A lot of people get really nervous about installing from a dev tree onto their
one and only router. They really should be able to install from a release before
the hardware is discontinued.
-tftp process. I just get timeouts on
the tftp.
Any suggestions?
David Lang
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
orts of it working for people?
do you need someone to sponsor reviews of it?
There are a lot of people out there who would like to run OpenWRT on their ADSL
router (myself included), so I would think that there's interest in adding
support for these sorts of devices.
David Lang
On Fri, 8 No
As I understand it, lawyers are looking over the situation with this driver
before it gets included in the upstream kernel.
David Lang
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013, Wojciech Kromer wrote:
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 14:34:44 +0100
From: Wojciech Kromer
Reply-To: OpenWrt Development List
To: OpenWrt
nwrt images for the 3700v2 and 3800 in the past, but
I am not as familiar as I would need to be with the boot process and firmware
signatures needed to get things loaded to move forward with this.
If someone can coach me through the process, I would
ead is that two new radio sections get created, with the
MAC address in them, default SSID, and disabled.
How can I work around this without having to gather all the MAC addresses ahead
of time and putting them in the config files that I push out to the router
ttle messy with lots of networks. I'll look into it though.
David Lang
- Felix
On 2013-02-10 11:25 AM, Mitch Kelly wrote:
Hi,
Removing option disabled 1 into 'wireless' and adding in the SSID etc before
you build should do the trick, You should not need to add the MAC address
i
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2013-02-10 12:05 PM, David Lang wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013, Felix Fietkau wrote:
Newer OpenWrt versions put the device path in the wifi sections
instead of the MAC address.
This is a recent build from Trunk, could you give me an example of
e rest of your system.
There are so many ways in that modifying the source code you download in a way
that will still compile on a project that changes as rapidly as openwrt is a
very daunting task, and you should expect that they have far better uses of
their time.
David Lang
At minimu
squashfs code to allow it to deal with badblocks.
has this been done? was I misinformed on what the problem is? or is this still a
problem and devices with nand flash can work, but only if they avoid squashfs?
David Lang
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
On Fri, 28 Mar 2014, Alan.Hoo wrote:
Hello Everyone
how can I remove the nf_conntrack kernel module from OpenWRT System ?
creating a build config without it is hard, there are a huge number of indirect
dependencies that trigger it, and most of them won't show up until you disable
some other
s are beginning.
David Lang
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Fri, 9 May 2014, John Crispin wrote:
(maybe i should start to only send the acks for this series, it will
save us a lot of time)
no, giving the reasons for each nack is valuable.
David Lang
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel
can actually knock you off the network
due to broken ISPs, cerowrt has spent a lot of time over the last couple of
months working on this. I would suggest at least reading through the issues
they've been having making things work in the real world before enabling this.
David Lang
Also
I think the concern being raised is why didn't it power itself via the USB port
even if the PoE was low.
Also, I don't have mine handy, but is the PoE module plugged in or soldered in?
I thought it was a plugin
David Lang
On Sat, 15 Mar 2025, Sebastian Moeller via openwrt-d
ther via diodes or something like that)
David Lang
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
different cases available,
one with internal antennas and one with external antennas. (I've converted APs
both ways for my own uses)
David Lang
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/l
#x27;s
just a NATed upstream connection (and while fast enough to be useful, it's not
so fast that you need to worry about the performance)
I would suggest getting an OpenWRT one router, it's got pleanty of performace
for this, and you know the support will be good in
Internet), what attacks do you expect to see?
David Lang
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Kevin Vigouroux wrote:
I would have liked to implement the vendor-specific information option in the
odhcpd server. Look at RFC3925 and RFC8415.
I know my implementation is somewhat complex. I don't know if it works. I'll
have to test it and add comments to clarify the logic. I'm not sure if I
what is it you are trying to do? you may not need to make deep code changes like
this.
for the scale conference we created a udhcpcd.user file to interpret custom
fields
https://github.com/davidelang/scale-network/blob/master/openwrt/files/etc/udhcpc.user
David Lang
101 - 136 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
