Re: openwrt ONE: not getting enough PoE power

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Hi Michael, my oldish zyxel PoE s

Re: openwrt ONE: not getting enough PoE power

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Hi Michael, my oldish zyxel PoE s

Re: openwrt ONE: not getting enough PoE power

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Hi David, > On 15. Mar 2025, at

Re: openwrt ONE: not getting enough PoE power

On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 06:27:38AM -0700, David Lang wrote: > I think the concern being raised is why didn't it power itself via the USB > port even if the PoE was low. +1 > > Also, I don't have mine handy, but is the PoE module plugged in or soldered > in? I thought it was a plugin It's solder

[PATCH] selinux-policy: update to version v2.6

Changes since v2.1: 1228b1d README 8cd7a4a wireguard/netifd loose ends d26ed92 file_contexts.subs_dist b756046 tmux and htop rules dcb983a various 2c03fd4 conf.cil: netlink_xperm ee8d6d3 blkid fdfc313 (tag: v2.5) dnsmasq b66a3d2 do_stage2 related 5e13212 more do_stage2 related c5bea19 absolute pat

Re: openwrt ONE: not getting enough PoE power

The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Hi David, > On 15. Mar 2025, at

[PATCH] selinux-policy: update to version v2.6

Changes since v2.1: 1228b1d README 8cd7a4a wireguard/netifd loose ends d26ed92 file_contexts.subs_dist b756046 tmux and htop rules dcb983a various 2c03fd4 conf.cil: netlink_xperm ee8d6d3 blkid fdfc313 (tag: v2.5) dnsmasq b66a3d2 do_stage2 related 5e13212 more do_stage2 related c5bea19 absolute pat

Re: openwrt ONE: not getting enough PoE power

Michael Richardson wrote: > With the cable in the PoE port, the device was in a reboot cycle. It turns out that the switch in question is a process by which it turns itself off momentarily to change to the correct vlan. This is a local, IETF hackthon setting. This cuts the PoE power, and s

Re: openwrt ONE: not getting enough PoE power

I think the concern being raised is why didn't it power itself via the USB port even if the PoE was low. Also, I don't have mine handy, but is the PoE module plugged in or soldered in? I thought it was a plugin David Lang On Sat, 15 Mar 2025, Sebastian Moeller via openwrt-devel wrote: Date

Re: openwrt ONE: not getting enough PoE power

Denver Gingerich wrote: On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 06:41:15AM +0700, Michael Richardson wrote: Michael Richardson wrote: > With the cable in the PoE port, the device was in a reboot cycle. It turns out that the switch in question is a process by which it turns itself off momentarily to chang

Re: openwrt ONE: not getting enough PoE power

On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 06:41:15AM +0700, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Michael Richardson wrote: > > With the cable in the PoE port, the device was in a reboot cycle. > > It turns out that the switch in question is a process by which it turns > itself off momentarily to change to the correc