Re: Asking for feedback: [PATCH] fw4: add masquerade-prefix snat type

2025-02-27 Thread Goetz Goerisch
Thank you Jonas for the initiative. For Multi-Homing and Load-balacing scenarios I was always looking into RFC8678 [1] or RFC8475 [2]. But as you mentioned there is no support in OpenWrt or mwan3 as of today. Therefore I would be interested in a solution, nevertheless I have no deployment and tes

Re: Asking for feedback: [PATCH] fw4: add masquerade-prefix snat type

2025-02-27 Thread Jonas Lochmann
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 11:49:10AM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote: > But this is mostly pointing back to the first issue: Why is it that we > need a feature which is so weird and unique to OpenWrt that it has never > been described before? Because this solves a problem where no solution exists yet. The f

Re: OpenWrt One JTAG

2025-02-27 Thread Daniel Golle
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 12:07:22PM +0100, Charlemagne Lasse wrote: > Am Do., 27. Feb. 2025 um 09:41 Uhr schrieb John Crispin : > > > > JTAG has been tested and works fine, I managed to upload a ram uboot and > > reflash a board. obviously no mikrobus module can be populated. However > > it is recom

Asking for feedback: [PATCH] fw4: add masquerade-prefix snat type

2025-02-27 Thread Jonas Lochmann
More than a month has passed without any feedback that helped me. There was one comment regarding an RFC that this does not implement (because its functionality and goals are similar but different) and the name of this feature that is considered misleading. Regarding the second point, there was no

Re: OpenWrt One JTAG

2025-02-27 Thread John Crispin
JTAG has been tested and works fine, I managed to upload a ram uboot and reflash a board. obviously no mikrobus module can be populated. However it is recommended to use mtk_uartboot for worst case scenario recovery as described in the wiki     John On 27.02.25 03:07, Charlemagne Lasse wrote:

Re: OpenWrt One JTAG

2025-02-27 Thread Charlemagne Lasse
Am Do., 27. Feb. 2025 um 09:41 Uhr schrieb John Crispin : > > JTAG has been tested and works fine, I managed to upload a ram uboot and > reflash a board. obviously no mikrobus module can be populated. However > it is recommended to use mtk_uartboot for worst case scenario recovery > as described in

Re: Asking for feedback: [PATCH] fw4: add masquerade-prefix snat type

2025-02-27 Thread Bjørn Mork via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- Jonas Lochmann writes: > More th