On 11.06.19 23:12, Jonas Gorski wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 23:08, Stijn Tintel wrote:
Hi,
Since we now have a 19.07 branch, is it OK to switch KERNEL_PATCHVER for
targets in master that have 4.19 support to 4.19?
Fine by me. The earlier we start testing 4.19, the faster we can iron
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:21:45PM +0800, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2019-06-11 12:32, Nylon Chen wrote:
> > When a building package has -flto option leads to building error
> >
> > We must use the gcc-ar wrapper instead of ar to invoke ar with the right
> > plugin arguments for handling the LTO ob
Hi!
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 8:42 AM Jeff Kletsky wrote:
>
> From: Jeff Kletsky
> * The kernel and software for both the NOR- and NAND-resident
> variants need to be able to read/write raw MTD as well as UBI.
>
> * The existing sysupgrade paths already prevent flashing of a
> NOR-inte
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 at 11:02, Koen Vandeputte
wrote:
>
>
> On 11.06.19 23:12, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 23:08, Stijn Tintel wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Since we now have a 19.07 branch, is it OK to switch KERNEL_PATCHVER for
> >> targets in master that have 4.19 sup
On 12.06.19 14:06, Jonas Gorski wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 at 11:02, Koen Vandeputte
wrote:
On 11.06.19 23:12, Jonas Gorski wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 23:08, Stijn Tintel wrote:
Hi,
Since we now have a 19.07 branch, is it OK to switch KERNEL_PATCHVER for
targets in master that ha
On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 at 13:12, Jonas Gorski wrote:
>
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 15:42, Daniel Golle wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jonas,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 03:48:29PM +0100, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:39:26PM +, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 14:21, D
solve coverity reported resource leak (socket handle)
Signed-off-by: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
---
utils.c | 18 --
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/utils.c b/utils.c
index 7f09787..fc6bbd7 100644
--- a/utils.c
+++ b/utils.c
@@ -944,18 +944,24 @@ bool
Hi Kevin,
ACK. Feel free to push.
~ Jo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi Hans!!
Am 11.06.19 um 22:16 schrieb Hans Dedecker:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:10 PM Andre Valentin wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> after testing xfrm tunnels a bit I found to big differences compared to
>> other convential tunnels.
>> 1) xfrm tunnel interfaces cannot be replaced with net
add --license option to print (SPDX) license tag in the
`installed-packages` overview. This is useful for manifest generation,
as it show all licenses used within an image. In case the license is not
available, a question mark (?) is printed instead.
base-files - 198-r10203+1-c12bd3a21b - GPL-2.0
Hi Ted,
> This sounds like a good idea - would giving you commit access to our
> docker hub [0] repo be of any help? Is there anything else I could
> help with?
I'd be happy with commit access to the docker hub (not to mistake with
git commit access).
Please find here a reworked version with a RE
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 8:28 PM Andre Valentin wrote:
>
> Hi Hans!!
> Am 11.06.19 um 22:16 schrieb Hans Dedecker:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:10 PM Andre Valentin
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Hans,
> >>
> >> after testing xfrm tunnels a bit I found to big differences compared to
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
