Hi Sukru,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 08:52:57PM +, Sukru Senli wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Regarding (Phase 2 - ubus rpc proxy), I had opened a thread in October:
> https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2016-October/042252.html
>
> Currently we are working on a solution where multiple
On 2016-12-01 16:05, Daniel Golle wrote:
> Hi Sukru,
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 08:52:57PM +, Sukru Senli wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Regarding (Phase 2 - ubus rpc proxy), I had opened a thread in October:
>> https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2016-October/042252.html
>>
>> C
Hi Felix,
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:12:38PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-12-01 16:05, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > Hi Sukru,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 08:52:57PM +, Sukru Senli wrote:
> >> Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >> Regarding (Phase 2 - ubus rpc proxy), I had opened a thread in October:
On 2016-12-01 16:38, Daniel Golle wrote:
> Hi Felix,
>
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:12:38PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2016-12-01 16:05, Daniel Golle wrote:
>> > I was following your posts and do believe there is quite some overlap.
>> > It would thus be feasible to generalize the common pa
