[OpenWrt-Devel] git.infradead.org offline? mirror for mtd-utils-1.4.5?

Hi, ist there somewhere a mirror for mtd-utils-1.4.5? git.infradead.org seems to be (temporary) dead: Cloning into 'mtd-utils-1.4.5'... fatal: unable to connect to git.infradead.org: git.infradead.org: Name or service not known Thanks, Claudio -- Working on OpenWrt BB for XM1700E

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] git.infradead.org offline? mirror for mtd-utils-1.4.5?

I’m seeing the same thing: Checking out files from the git repository... Cloning into 'mtd-utils-1.4.5'... fatal: unable to connect to git.infradead.org: git.infradead.org: Name or service not known It was also down a few days ago for quite a while; it would be nice if there was a ba

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] git.infradead.org offline? mirror for mtd-utils-1.4.5?

* Claudio Thomas [24.10.2014 10:08]: > ist there somewhere a mirror for mtd-utils-1.4.5? git.infradead.org copy these to your local dl/ dir: http://www.intercity-vpn.de/files/openwrt/mtd-utils-1.4.5.tar.gz http://www.intercity-vpn.de/files/openwrt/mtd-utils-1.5.0.tar.gz there is already a ticket

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] git.infradead.org offline? mirror for mtd-utils-1.4.5?

Thanks a lot, Claudio -- Working on OpenWrt BB for XM1700E On 24.10.2014 10:11, Bastian Bittorf wrote: > * Claudio Thomas [24.10.2014 10:08]: >> ist there somewhere a mirror for mtd-utils-1.4.5? git.infradead.org > copy these to your local

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] git.infradead.org offline? mirror for mtd-utils-1.4.5?

Thanks Bastian, this has worked for me as well :) Adam -Original Message- From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On Behalf Of Bastian Bittorf Sent: Friday, 24 October 2014 7:12 PM To: Claudio Thomas Cc: OpenWrt Development List Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] g

[OpenWrt-Devel] [BROKEN][package-ipkg.mk] postinst, prerm, conffiles from original makefile killed

Original content of Makefile postinst and prerm and conffiles is not moved to final package. Content of postinst-pkg : "ostinst" Content of prerm-pkg: "rerm" Content of conffiles: "onffiles" in the log you find: echo "onffiles" > conffiles; echo "ostinst-pkg" > postinst-pkg; echo "rerm-p

[OpenWrt-Devel] alternative for "pyserial+python-mini"

Hi, "python-mini" is missing in oldpackages (trunk), is there an alternative for "python-mini"? I need it for pyserial, which depends on "python-mini", and still exists in oldpackages (trunk). What about "micropython+micropython-lib"? Has anyone already tested this as replacement? Thanks, Claudio

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] alternative for "pyserial+python-mini"

python-mini is now just python. On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Claudio Thomas wrote: > Hi, > "python-mini" is missing in oldpackages (trunk), is there an alternative > for "python-mini"? > I need it for pyserial, which depends on "python-mini", and still exists > in oldpackages (trunk). >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [BROKEN][package-ipkg.mk] postinst, prerm, conffiles from original makefile killed

Hi Christian, should be fixed with 43017 - thanks for reporting. Btw, there's two little problems with the prerm & postinst defines in the ddns-scripts Makefile: First you should not indent the script code, otherwise the final script file will have leading spaces on each line. Second you must q

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] git.infradead.org offline? mirror for mtd-utils-1.4.5?

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Claudio Thomas wrote: > fatal: unable to connect to git.infradead.org: > git.infradead.org: Name or service not known It seems to be up again. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@l

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [BROKEN][package-ipkg.mk] postinst, prerm, conffiles from original makefile killed

Hi Jow, postinst and prerm are copied shell scripts and executed on the box and not by make thats the reason for #!/bin/sh required on the first line so "$$" not needed. right ? Thanks Christian Am 24.10.2014 um 11:32 schrieb Jo-Philipp Wich: > Hi Christian, > > should be fixed with 43017 - tha

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [BROKEN][package-ipkg.mk] postinst, prerm, conffiles from original makefile killed

Hi. > postinst and prerm are copied shell scripts > and executed on the box and not by make > thats the reason for #!/bin/sh required on the first line > so "$$" not needed. right ? Nope, not right - it is needed. Make is interpreting the stuff between define .. endef - you need to escape $ in an

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] comgt: add ncm proto support

Well this is what John told me: "try /dev/cdc-wdm0 as a device or simply do config interface option proto wwan option apn opengate the new wwan proto will automagically detect your needed prot and device" I had also tried this and variations, but same resuls: config interface 'wan' op

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ramips: fix filenames in PorayDualSize factory images

From: Roger Pueyo Centelles --- target/linux/ramips/image/Makefile | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/image/Makefile b/target/linux/ramips/image/Makefile index 9a47f86..9317779 100644 --- a/target/linux/ramips/image/Makefile +++ b/target/

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] comgt: add ncm proto support

Sami Olmari writes: > Well this is what John told me: > > "try /dev/cdc-wdm0 as a device or simply do > > config interface > option proto wwan > option apn opengate > > the new wwan proto will automagically detect your needed prot and device" Ah, right. So I am only confusing things with my wil

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] python-smbus

So, I created this updated version. https://gist.github.com/commodo/2a5ac7e09b0ae68c9d84 The original Makefile is a bit messed up. This version builds, but when I import smbus I get this failure: /usr/bin/python2.7: symbol 'i2c_smbus_access': can't resolve symbol in lib '/usr/lib/python2.7/site-

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [BROKEN][package-ipkg.mk] postinst, prerm, conffiles from original makefile killed

Mea culpa! I mixed something up Christian Am 24.10.2014 um 13:42 schrieb Jo-Philipp Wich: > Hi. > >> postinst and prerm are copied shell scripts >> and executed on the box and not by make >> thats the reason for #!/bin/sh required on the first line >> so "$$" not needed. right ? > > Nope, not r

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Regarding bridge multicast-to-unicast patch

On 2014-09-11 16:28, Linus Lüssing wrote: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:31:37PM +0200, Linus Lüssing wrote: >> Another approach would be >> to add a feature to mac80211 to disable the forwarding of >> IGMPv2/MLDv1 reports to other STAs, only forwarding it on the own >> AP interface so that the bridg

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] [kernel] update 3.10.49 to 3.10.58

On 2014-10-22 12:16, Bastian Bittorf wrote: > diff --git a/include/kernel-version.mk b/include/kernel-version.mk > index 3afe953..4eb6179 100644 > --- a/include/kernel-version.mk > +++ b/include/kernel-version.mk > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ endif > ifeq ($(LINUX_VERSION),3.8.13) >LINUX_KERNEL_MD5SUM:=2a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 3/3] [V2] netifd: Read current link state when processing netlink event

On 2014-10-23 11:13, Hans Dedecker wrote: > Netifd commit b2dcb02570939d98b92c7c55db1c328693a5d52a introduces > a race condition resulting into infinite toggling interfaces > (eg static interfaces with linksensing enabled, vlan interfaces > with proto none (#18106)) when linksensing is enabled resu

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] broadcom_wl: eliminate compiler error with gcc-4.9-linaro

On 2014-10-18 22:23, Nathan Hintz wrote: > Attempting to build broadcom_wl (from trunk) with the linaro 4.9.x > toolchain produces the following errors: > > <...>/wl_linux.c: In function 'wl_dump_ver': > <...>/wl_linux.c:2302:3: error: macro "__DATE__" might prevent reproducible > builds [-Werror

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Regarding bridge multicast-to-unicast patch

PS: Also found another, small potential bug in your unicasting patch: The 'src = eth_hdr(skb)->h_source's you added can break because after this assignment but before the usage of 'src' there are calls to "pskb_may_pull(skb)". pskb_may_pull(skb) can reallocate the skb->data, potentially leading to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Regarding bridge multicast-to-unicast patch

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 06:35:27PM +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2014-09-11 16:28, Linus Lüssing wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:31:37PM +0200, Linus Lüssing wrote: > >> Another approach would be > >> to add a feature to mac80211 to disable the forwarding of > >> IGMPv2/MLDv1 reports to ot

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] please send nvram dump of some brcm47xx based devices

Here is nvram damp from Asus WL500G Premium v1 ( all RAM is enabled by default ) root@OpenWrt:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo system type : Broadcom BCM4704 machine : Asus WL500GP V1 processor : 0 cpu model : Broadcom BMIPS3300 V0.6 BogoMIPS

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] BB: vgv7519: support more recent board release with vrx288 v1.2

The existance of this new board has been confirmed and tested by the guy on this commit https://github.com/openwrt-vgv7519/uboot-bin/commit/76fdd8e638f81e324ffe77856481bd147398f6e8 --- target/linux/lantiq/dts/VGV7519.dtsi |3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] kernel: makefile: make use of new var KERNEL_PATCHVER

kernel: makefile: make use of new var KERNEL_PATCHVER replace all occurences of LINUX_VERSION with the cleaner approach. future kernel upgrades must mostly touch only one file. the only platform left is netlogic, because it uses a intermediate kernel 3.14.16 Signed-off-by: Bastian Bittorf --- t

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] vgv7519: support more recent board release with vrx288 v1.2

The existance of this new board has been confirmed and tested by the guy on this commit https://github.com/openwrt-vgv7519/uboot-bin/commit/76fdd8e638f81e324ffe77856481bd147398f6e8 --- target/linux/lantiq/dts/VGV7519.dtsi |3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/t

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] kernel: makefile: make use of new var KERNEL_PATCHVER

On 2014-10-24 21:30, Bastian Bittorf wrote: > kernel: makefile: make use of new var KERNEL_PATCHVER Next time please don't repeat the subject in the email body. > replace all occurences of LINUX_VERSION with the cleaner > approach. future kernel upgrades must mostly touch only > one file. the only

[OpenWrt-Devel] what are plans for migrating packages from git.openwrt.org/packages to github?

was wondering why i couldn't find some packages documented on the wiki, and finally ran across this discussion of the migration of packages from http://git.openwrt.org/packages.git to https://github.com/openwrt/packages: https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=51078 the "issue" i was havi

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] kernel: update 3.10.49 to 3.10.58 (released 2014-oct-15)

All platforms which are using 3.10.x at the moment are upgraded. Changelogs: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.10.50 https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.10.51 https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.10.52 https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] kernel: update 3.10.49 to 3.10.58 (released 2014-oct-15)

On 2014-10-24 22:03, Bastian Bittorf wrote: > All platforms which are using 3.10.x at the moment are upgraded. > > Changelogs: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.10.50 > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.10.51 > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] what are plans for migrating packages from git.openwrt.org/packages to github?

On 24 October 2014 21:36, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > the "issue" i was having is that, because of that migration, some > packages clearly documented in the wiki are unavailable now that the > "old packages" feed line is, by default, commented out. examples: > > * gpsd: documented here: > > http:/

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2] kernel: update 3.10.49 to 3.10.58 (released 2014-oct-15)

All platforms which are using 3.10.x at the moment are upgraded. Changelogs: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.10.50 https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.10.51 https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.10.52 https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2] kernel: update 3.10.49 to 3.10.58 (released 2014-oct-15)

On 2014-10-24 22:36, Bastian Bittorf wrote: > All platforms which are using 3.10.x at the moment are upgraded. > > Changelogs: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.10.50 > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.10.51 > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] what are plans for migrating packages from git.openwrt.org/packages to github?

On Fri, 24 Oct 2014, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 24 October 2014 21:36, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > the "issue" i was having is that, because of that migration, some > > packages clearly documented in the wiki are unavailable now that the > > "old packages" feed line is, by default, commented out.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2] kernel: update 3.10.49 to 3.10.58 (released 2014-oct-15)

On 24/10/14 23:41, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2014-10-24 22:36, Bastian Bittorf wrote: All platforms which are using 3.10.x at the moment are upgraded. Changelogs: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.10.58 Signed-off-by: Bastian Bittorf Committed in r43049, thanks. Good