Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2] mac80211: remove error from detect script

Good one Felix, I'll fix that and re-post. Kind regards, Michel Stam -Original Message- From: Felix Fietkau [mailto:n...@openwrt.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 19:07 PM To: Stam, Michel [FINT]; openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2] mac80211: rem

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ar71xx: qihoo-c301: reset imageNtrynum after each successful boot.

On 09/10/2014 04:30, Yousong Zhou wrote: > On 7 October 2014 02:33, John Crispin wrote: >> >> On 14/09/2014 02:27, Yousong Zhou wrote: >>> Qihoo C301 has 2 flash chips of which one is used as primary >>> and the other is used as backup. OEM U-Boot will try to boot >>> an activeregion N with im

[OpenWrt-Devel] uboot-omap: add C4 revision in findfdt

fixes BeagleBoard C4 detection error message in serial console was: "WARNING: Could not determine device tree to use" change is found in upstream u-boot Signed-off-by: Dirk Neukirchen --- package/boot/uboot-omap/patches/003-fix_findfdt_C4.patch | 11 +++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC PATCH] packages: Smart Queue Management for AQM Packet Scheduling and Qos from CeroWrt

Hello Stephan, On Oct 9, 2014, at 01:01 , Stephan Günther wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Hannu Nyman wrote: >> Dave Taht wrote on Thu Oct 2 03:49:15 CEST 2014: >>> So I don't know where to go. Certainly I'd like to see the battle hardened >>> sqm scripts (which are more fle

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v3] mac80211: remove error from detect script

On 2014-10-09 10:56, Michel Stam wrote: > Signed-off-by: Michel Stam Committed in r42861, thanks. - Felix ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v3] mac80211: remove error from detect script

Signed-off-by: Michel Stam --- package/kernel/mac80211/files/lib/wifi/mac80211.sh | 15 +++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/package/kernel/mac80211/files/lib/wifi/mac80211.sh b/package/kernel/mac80211/files/lib/wifi/mac80211.sh index a3b2199..0b662eb 10

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v3] mac80211: remove error from detect script

* Michel Stam [09.10.2014 11:16]: > Signed-off-by: Michel Stam > --- > package/kernel/mac80211/files/lib/wifi/mac80211.sh | 15 +++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/package/kernel/mac80211/files/lib/wifi/mac80211.sh > b/package/kernel/mac80211/fil

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v3] mac80211: remove error from detect script

Hello Bastian, I saw the patch already went into GIT, so reworking it will be a tad difficult. Renaming from dev to phy might be tricky as phy is a non-local variable. _phy / _dev could become local variables without problem, but to commit a new patch just for that seems a bit unnecessary. Kind

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v3] mac80211: remove error from detect script

On 2014-10-09 11:25, Bastian Bittorf wrote: > * Michel Stam [09.10.2014 11:16]: >> Signed-off-by: Michel Stam >> --- >> package/kernel/mac80211/files/lib/wifi/mac80211.sh | 15 +++ >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/package/kernel/mac80211/files/l

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] comgt: add ncm proto support

On 08/10/14 17:42, John Crispin wrote: On 08/10/2014 17:27, Conor O'Gorman wrote: On 08/10/14 11:00, John Crispin wrote: the e3267 that sami sent me works with this proto, but i am failing to get a DHCP addr. could someone with a ncm dongle please try this patch on top of latest trunk please

[OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWRT Barrier Breaker missing packages in image builder

Hello, At first: Congratulations to the final Barrier Breaker release - it was obviously a hard piece of work. When trying the BB image builder I recognized that the auto-download of some packages (in this case "nano") still doesnt work. It does neither work right from the start nor after I downl

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWRT Barrier Breaker missing packages in image builder

Hi. It makes no sense to use "scripts/feeds" in the Imagebuilder, that is only required to recompile packages. Add the following lines to repositories.conf and invoke make image as usual: src/gz barrier_breaker_packages http://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_breaker/14.07/ar71xx/generic/package

[OpenWrt-Devel] octeon: segfault any libpcap related programs

Hi, I got segfault for any libpcap related binaries (tcpdump, iftop, etc). System is a ubnt edgerouter lite: DISTRIB_ID="OpenWrt " DISTRIB_RELEASE="14.07" DISTRIB_REVISION="r42625 " DISTRIB_CODENAME="barrier_breaker" D

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] lantiq: allow pcie to be disabled by dts + vgv7519 fix pci irq + disable pcie by dts

Attached patch make wifi working on vgv7519. It shouldn't introduce regressions on other devices. vgv7519-patch.patch Description: Binary data ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] comgt: add ncm proto support

"Conor O'Gorman" writes: > On 08/10/14 11:00, John Crispin wrote: >> the e3267 that sami sent me works with this proto, but i am failing to >> get a DHCP addr. could someone with a ncm dongle please try this patch >> on top of latest trunk please and tell me if they are getting a dhcp addr ? > > I

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] comgt: add ncm proto support

On 09/10/2014 14:14, Bjørn Mork wrote: > "Conor O'Gorman" writes: >> On 08/10/14 11:00, John Crispin wrote: >>> the e3267 that sami sent me works with this proto, but i am >>> failing to get a DHCP addr. could someone with a ncm dongle >>> please try this patch on top of latest trunk please and

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWRT Barrier Breaker missing packages in image builder

Thanks for the notice. I updated the HOWTO on http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/obtain.firmware.generate for BB 14.07 and the package repository configuration. > Jo-Philipp Wich hat am 9. Oktober 2014 um 12:15 > geschrieben: > > > Hi. > > It makes no sense to use "scripts/feeds" in the Imageb

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] comgt: add ncm proto support

John Crispin writes: > ok, i am currently bumping some targets to v3.17. lets assume it is > broken for < 3.16 and hope 3.17 works. > > NCM seems to be broken by design and only a container as each dongle > apparently uses its own AT magic. at least between Motorola, Sony and > Huawei they are to

[OpenWrt-Devel] x86_64 option is now missing - help!

I've been developing a x86_64 bit system during the release candidates. Now that the final is released, x86_64 is not an option anymore. Is there a possibility of getting this added back or is it something I can do? I'm developing for a baytrail (Intel) multicore processor and would like it to ru

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] comgt: add ncm proto support

On 09/10/14 13:25, John Crispin wrote: personally i have been using mbim since i wrote umbim and it just works :) Ah, nice. I have some similar code, but in lua, from the json files. It's only a management protocol. Note that MBIM uses the NCM code for the bulk packet data, so it's packet

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] comgt: add ncm proto support

"Conor O'Gorman" writes: > On 09/10/14 13:25, John Crispin wrote: >> >> personally i have been using mbim since i wrote umbim and it just works :) >> > > Ah, nice. I have some similar code, but in lua, from the json > files. It's only a management protocol. > > Note that MBIM uses the NCM code for

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] comgt: add ncm proto support

On 09/10/2014 15:35, Conor O'Gorman wrote: > On 09/10/14 13:25, John Crispin wrote: >> >> personally i have been using mbim since i wrote umbim and it >> just works :) >> > > Ah, nice. I have some similar code, but in lua, from the json > files. It's only a management protocol. > > Note that

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] comgt: add ncm proto support

On 09/10/2014 14:58, Bjørn Mork wrote: > John Crispin writes: > >> ok, i am currently bumping some targets to v3.17. lets assume it >> is broken for < 3.16 and hope 3.17 works. >> >> NCM seems to be broken by design and only a container as each >> dongle apparently uses its own AT magic. at le

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] comgt: add ncm proto support

John Crispin writes: > i am currently using a vodafone k5105 which is a huawei rebrand. at > 150 euro its very expensive. any other good ones ? I find it impossible to recommend any specific modems because important firmware features like MBIM depend on both operator branding and geographical ta

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] fstools: Deal with overlayfs v23+

OverlayFS version 23 and later require an additional directory to be given at mount time. Add a patch to the fstools to first test wether it can mount it without (for older versions), and if not, use the new mechanism. Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard --- ...s-mount-Support-latest-overlayfs-version

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] [dnsmasq] support enforced start-IP, end-IP, netmask

[dnsmasq] support enforced start-IP, end-IP, netmask there are corner cases where the "simple" setup via start/end/limit option does not fit, in our case we need to hand out 192.168.2.1 ... 192.168.2.254 with a netmask of /24 but the underlying interface has 192.168.0.1/16 so the smart autodetect

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCHv2] Linux 3.16 support on mvebu

Hi, This is the second version of my rather big changes to support the 3.16 kernel, and more specifically on the mvebu SoCs. The first patch ports the existing 3.14 patches to 3.16, and creates a generic configuration for it. http://free-electrons.com/~maxime/pub/openwrt-3.16/v2-0001-linux-Add-3

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] x86_64 option is now missing - help!

On 09.10.2014 15:00, William Haynes wrote: > I've been developing a x86_64 bit system during the release candidates. > Now that the final is released, x86_64 is not an option anymore. Is there > a possibility of getting this added back or is it something I can do? I'm > developing for a baytrail

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/4] ubinize-image: Change the rootfs to a static volume

On boards with large page size, the rootfs we generate might end up using less PEB than the minimum number required by UBI for a dynamic volume. Change the rootfs to a static volume, which removes such a requirement, and isn't changing anything, since our rootfs is in read only anyway. Signed-off

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/4] mvebu: Replace the padjffs2 call by the generic definition

The mvebu image Makefile directly calls the padjffs2 utility, while there's an generic make function to do just that. Switch to it Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard --- target/linux/mvebu/image/Makefile | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/target/linux/mvebu/image/Makef

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/4] mvebu: Add support for the Globalscale Mirabox

Hi, This patch adds a new profile for the Mirabox, and fixes a few things along the way, mostly because of the Mirabox NAND page size that differs from the other mvebu boards (and most of the boards supported by OpenWRT apparently). Thanks, Maxime Maxime Ripard (4): mvebu: Replace the padjffs2

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 4/4] mvebu: Add a profile for the Mirabox

The GlobalScale Mirabox features an Armada 370, with 1GB of NAND and 1GB of RAM, 2 Gigabit Ethernet ports, 2 USB3 ports, and a wifi bgn chip. Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard --- target/linux/mvebu/profiles/110-mirabox.mk | 15 +++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tar

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 3/4] mvebu: push UBI and UBIFS options to the profiles

The page size and related NAND options are completely board specific. It makes little sense to define such options in the global image Makefile. Move these informations to the profiles, where it is more fit. Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard --- target/linux/mvebu/image/Makefile | 5 +---

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] x86_64 option is now missing - help!

That makes sense. So, if I build from the trunk, will Barrier Breaker packages still be able to be pulled or will the versions diverge to the point I have to maintain a separate download location for packages until time for an upgrade? Sincerely, William Haynes Sabai Technology -

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [Cerowrt-devel] [RFC PATCH] packages: Smart Queue Management for AQM Packet Scheduling and Qos from CeroWrt

Hi Richard, On Oct 9, 2014, at 18:42 , Richard Smith wrote: > On 10/06/2014 03:41 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > >>> >>> I have spare routers that I can run OpenWRT or CeroWRt on and I'm >>> setup to test with netperf, netperf-wrapper on my local network ( >>> desktop -> router -> laptop ) it

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [Cerowrt-devel] [RFC PATCH] packages: Smart Queue Management for AQM Packet Scheduling and Qos from CeroWrt

Please excuse my dumb question or just point me to the right documentation. But is there an easy way to run AQM/Codel on BB 14.07 ?? I'm running BB on a MyNETN750 that looks like it meets the HW requirements. Regards, Luis Garcia On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > Hi Ri

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [Cerowrt-devel] [RFC PATCH] packages: Smart Queue Management for AQM Packet Scheduling and Qos from CeroWrt

Ooops, On Oct 9, 2014, at 20:13 , Dave Taht wrote: > 3.3 is obsolete, use 3.10. What Dave says, I should have actually looked at the copied link… Sorry Sebastian > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Sebastian Moeller wrote: >> Hi Richard, >> >> On Oct 9, 2014, at 18:42 , Richard

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Make "scripts/feeds update" to break after failing to update a feed (bug #17842)

"scripts/feeds update -a" can fail rather silently for feeds using git, as the script does not pause when updating a feed fails. Instead it prints the error message and calmly continues to the next feed. It is very easy to overlook update errors with the feeds updated first, as their text scroll

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] x86_64 option is now missing - help!

On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 17:51:10 +0200, Dirk Neukirchen wrote: On 09.10.2014 15:00, William Haynes wrote: I've been developing a x86_64 bit system during the release candidates. Now that the final is released, x86_64 is not an option anymore. Is there a possibility of getting this added back or

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCHv2] Linux 3.16 support on mvebu

Hi, On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 17:10:25 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: This is the second version of my rather big changes to support the 3.16 kernel, and more specifically on the mvebu SoCs. Thanks for looking into this :) I already had some work done for the same, I'll take a look and merge it w

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/4] mvebu: Add support for the Globalscale Mirabox

Hi, On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 17:59:25 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: This patch adds a new profile for the Mirabox, and fixes a few things along the way, mostly because of the Mirabox NAND page size that differs from the other mvebu boards (and most of the boards supported by OpenWRT apparently). A

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/4] mvebu: Add support for the Globalscale Mirabox

Hi Imre, On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:30:46PM +0200, Imre Kaloz wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 17:59:25 +0200, Maxime Ripard > wrote: > > >This patch adds a new profile for the Mirabox, and fixes a few things > >along the way, mostly because of the Mirabox NAND page size that > >differs fr

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Build 8M image for 7Links PX-4885

7Links PX-4885 (clones) can also be purchased with 8MB flash. Creating images for these routers. Signed-off-by: Cezary Jackiewicz --- diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/dts/PX4885-4M.dts b/target/linux/ramips/dts/PX4885-4M.dts new file mode 100644 index 000..2bea444 --- /dev/null +++ b/targe

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [Cerowrt-devel] [RFC PATCH] packages: Smart Queue Management for AQM Packet Scheduling and Qos from CeroWrt

Hi Luis, On Oct 9, 2014, at 20:05 , Luis E. Garcia wrote: > Please excuse my dumb question or just point me to the right documentation. > But is there an easy way to run AQM/Codel on BB 14.07 ?? I'm running BB on a > MyNETN750 that looks like it meets the HW requirements. There probab

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Default dhcp (client) hostname is unset - Luci implies $(hostname)

On 10/8/14 4:06 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > About LuCI and the applications/scripts behind I can say that the "default" > is normally not set in the config because it's done in the scripts/apps as > default. > As stated by Jow something like "none" doesn't work. > The placeholder is a good

[OpenWrt-Devel] Q: update kernel from 3.10.49 to 3.10.57

i would like to update the kernel, but just changing the entry in 'target/linux/ar71xx/Makefile' to LINUX_VERSION:=3.10.57 will not work, because some patches cannot be applied anymore. (it works without probs till 3.10.55). the question is: can somebody give me a hint about the workflow of how t

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Build 8M image for 7Links PX-4885

Hi, please use a dtsi file rather than just duplicating the whole file John On 09/10/2014 22:57, Cezary Jackiewicz wrote: > 7Links PX-4885 (clones) can also be purchased with 8MB flash. > Creating images for these routers. > > Signed-off-by: Cezary Jackiewicz --- > > diff --git a/tar

[OpenWrt-Devel] [buildbot breakage] ramips / ramips.rt3883 since 42807

Browsing the buildbots I saw both ramips and ramips.rt3883 [1],[2] fail with: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ralink.c:31:26: fatal error: linux/of_i2c.h: No such file or directory #include linux/of_i2c.h is introduced in: https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/42807 it seems to be removed from upstream [3