I'm using an embedded system with busybox v1.22.1, running Openwrt Chaos
Chalmer r42321, mips24k AR9330
When I call 'busybox false --help', the return status is zero. I think it has
nothing todo with openwrt, because it's the output of busybox, not the problem
on openwrt performance. I feel it'
hm... it still seems that the board integrator should be able to determine the
node name for the device. Implementing a
scheme based on base address still hard wires the node name to the port and
does not provide the flexibility of changing
it.Absolutely depending on the load order is quirk
apparently our problem is not new and the existing solution is the
"linux,stdout-path" syntax
so stdout-path = &uartf; should work (... maybe)
jonas just pointed this out to me
On 30/08/2014 11:37, Luis Soltero wrote:
> hm... it still seems that the board integrator should be able to determin
On 29/08/14 14:26, Daniel Petre wrote:
> Hello,
> is there any OpenWrt compatible gigabit router that can do more than 400
> Mbit/s WAN to LAN except linksys wrt1900ac ?
> I know netgear wndr3700/wndr3800 and tp-link wr1043nd do around 380-400
> Mbit/s but is there any other hardware more powerful
Title: The Device Tree: Plug and play for Embedded Linux
If i am understanding correctly this something added to chosen to
bind the console to a specific uart... as in
/dts-v1/; /{
#address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <1>;
compatible = "xlnx,zynq-zed";
Title: The Device Tree: Plug and play for Embedded Linux
this...
aliases
{&
nbsp;&nbs
p;
* Alive4ever [29.08.2014 14:03]:
> I'm using an embedded system with busybox v1.22.1, running Openwrt Chaos
> Chalmer r42321, mips24k AR9330
>
> When I call 'busybox false --help', the return status is zero. I think it has
> nothing todo with openwrt, because it's the output of busybox, not the
* Daniel Petre [30.08.2014 07:42]:
> is there any OpenWrt compatible gigabit router that can do more than
> 400 Mbit/s WAN to LAN except linksys wrt1900ac ?
> I know netgear wndr3700/wndr3800 and tp-link wr1043nd do around
> 380-400 Mbit/s but is there any other hardware more powerful with
> OpenW
On 30/08/14 08:47, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
* Daniel Petre [30.08.2014 07:42]:
is there any OpenWrt compatible gigabit router that can do more than
400 Mbit/s WAN to LAN except linksys wrt1900ac ?
I know netgear wndr3700/wndr3800 and tp-link wr1043nd do around
380-400 Mbit/s but is there any ot
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Daniel Petre wrote:
> is there any OpenWrt compatible gigabit router that can do more than 400
> Mbit/s WAN to LAN except linksys wrt1900ac ?
Mikrotik and Ubiquiti gigabit routers will easily do 400Mb from LAN to
WAN, and can get 700-800Mb depending on your routin
Hi,
I've noticed that the code produced by Barrier Breaker's toolchain
sometimes has significantly worse performance that that built by
Attitude Adjustment.
I can see this extremely with the VPN tool "fastd" developed and
maintained by me: On the same Barrier Breaker system, a binary built by
the
On 08/30/2014 06:42 PM, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> Hi,
> I've noticed that the code produced by Barrier Breaker's toolchain
> sometimes has significantly worse performance that that built by
> Attitude Adjustment.
>
> I can see this extremely with the VPN tool "fastd" developed and
> maintained by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/30/2014 06:45 PM, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> On 08/30/2014 06:42 PM, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>> Hi, I've noticed that the code produced by Barrier Breaker's
>> toolchain sometimes has significantly worse performance that that
>> built by Attitud
On 2014-08-30 18:45, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> On 08/30/2014 06:42 PM, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I've noticed that the code produced by Barrier Breaker's toolchain
>> sometimes has significantly worse performance that that built by
>> Attitude Adjustment.
>>
>> I can see this extremely w
On 08/30/2014 06:54 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2014-08-30 18:45, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>> On 08/30/2014 06:42 PM, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I've noticed that the code produced by Barrier Breaker's toolchain
>>> sometimes has significantly worse performance that that built by
>>> At
On 2014-08-30 18:51, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 08/30/2014 06:45 PM, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>> On 08/30/2014 06:42 PM, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>>> Hi, I've noticed that the code produced by Barrier Breaker's
>>> toolchain sometimes has significantly worse performance that that
>>> built by Attit
Am 2014-08-30 17:17, schrieb Soren Harward:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Daniel Petre
wrote:
is there any OpenWrt compatible gigabit router that can do more than
400
Mbit/s WAN to LAN except linksys wrt1900ac ?
Mikrotik and Ubiquiti gigabit routers will easily do 400Mb from LAN to
WAN, a
On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 20:10 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> > This could be a problem caused by mips16. We use that in BB to create
> > smaller binaries. but Jonas saw a performance problem in some
> > applications, mostly stuff doing crypto (big integer calculations).
> > Can you try to build the B
On 2014-08-30 21:27, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 20:10 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>
>> > This could be a problem caused by mips16. We use that in BB to create
>> > smaller binaries. but Jonas saw a performance problem in some
>> > applications, mostly stuff doing crypto
On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 21:33 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2014-08-30 21:27, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> > On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 20:10 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> >
> >> > This could be a problem caused by mips16. We use that in BB to create
> >> > smaller binaries. but Jonas saw a perfor
Well done guys. These type of findings that makes significant different
on embedded systems.
Fernando
On 30/08/2014 20:33, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2014-08-30 21:27, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 20:10 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
This could be a problem caused by mips1
I'm running OpenWRT on this one:
http://www.amazon.com/TP-LINK-Archer-C7-Wireless-1350Mbps/dp/B00BUSDVBQ/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=undefined&sr=8-1&keywords=tp-link+ac
I haven't done any throughput tests to generate empirical data, but it
'feels' like it's operating at full speed.
--
Brent
On Sa
22 matches
Mail list logo
