Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] [packages] nagios-plugins: Fix check_procs command

2014-05-22 Thread Bernd Krumboeck
Am 2014-05-01 20:18, schrieb Hauke Mehrtens: On 04/02/2014 10:28 AM, Bernd Krumboeck wrote: Fix check_procs: ps command line parameters were misconfigured Signed-off-by: Bernd Krumböck Thank you for your patch, it was committed in r40637. Thanks. The patch was damage by some mail progra

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Initial Support for Ubiquiti UniFi Outdoor Plus

2014-05-22 Thread valent.turko...@gmail.com
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 2:33 AM, David Hutchison wrote: > I was able to get the Ubiquiti UniFi Outdoor Plus to boot into OpenWRT > today, however I need some assistance writing a patch for it. There > are two things that need to happen: > > First of all, this is how I got it to work: > > Modify tar

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v5] ppp: add new protocol PPPoSSH.

2014-05-22 Thread Yousong Zhou
Hi, Matthew and list. On 22 May 2014 06:24, Matthew Reeve wrote: > It has been known for a long time that this is actually a really terrible > idea: > > http://sites.inka.de/~W1011/devel/tcp-tcp.html > > It might appear to work just fine on completely uncongested links with zero > packet loss,

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Initial Support for Ubiquiti UniFi Outdoor Plus

2014-05-22 Thread David Hutchison
It's running well in OpenWRT, I just need some guidance on how to go about patching the "m25p80.c" file. Nobody responded about the Makefile change, if it was proper to use the "UAPPRO" profile, since it matches the UniFi+. If you manually apply those changes to your tree, it will work. -- Davey

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v5] ppp: add new protocol PPPoSSH.

2014-05-22 Thread Owen Kirby
On 14-05-22 06:01 AM, Yousong Zhou wrote: > I saw that link too when I found the pvpn project. If I understand > the theory correctly, the problem is mainly that TCP as a > connection-oriented protocol is not suitable for being used in > long-alive, lossy environment because once the underlying co

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 3/3] package: uboot-envtools: add Pogoplug E02 support

2014-05-22 Thread Felix Kaechele
The settings require that the OpenWrt provided u-boot is used as either first or second stage bootloader as it modifies the partitioning scheme to move the u-boot environment to a separate mtd partition. Signed-off-by: Felix Kaechele --- package/boot/uboot-envtools/files/kirkwood | 1 + 1 file c

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/3] package: uboot-kirkwood: re-add Pogoplug E02 support

2014-05-22 Thread Felix Kaechele
This patch modifies the u-boot config for the Pogoplug E02 to work with OpenWRT. It also enables building a second stage bootloader image. Signed-off-by: Felix Kaechele --- package/boot/uboot-kirkwood/Makefile | 6 ++- .../uboot-kirkwood/patches/140-pogoplug_e02.patch | 58 ++

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/3] Pogoplug E02 support for kernel 3.14

2014-05-22 Thread Felix Kaechele
This patchset brings the support for the Cloud Engines Pogoplug E02 up to speed for kernel 3.14 and u-boot 2014.04. The intention is to also upstream the kernel specific patches separately. Running u-boot in both first and second stage configuration, as well as flashing the ubifs image to the devi

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/3] kirkwood: Pogoplug E02 kernel support for 3.14

2014-05-22 Thread Felix Kaechele
this also fixes a typo in the UBIFS_OPTS Signed-off-by: Felix Kaechele --- .../kirkwood/patches-3.14/150-pogoplug_e02.patch | 127 + target/linux/kirkwood/profiles/120-pogoplug.mk | 2 +- 2 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 target/lin

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/3] RFC: Enable sysupgrade on ubifs rootfs

2014-05-22 Thread André Valentin
Hi! I'm playing with different hardware, mainly with NAND storage. I'm happy with ubi and ubifs, because it makes life easier and is a nice tool like lvm. But I noticed that I was unable to upgrade an ubifs volume. I used the sysupgrade framework, it unmounted root and killed several process. roo

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/3] procd: add support for running sysupgrade as PID 1

2014-05-22 Thread André Valentin
Signed-off-by: André Valentin --- package/system/procd/patches/100-sysupgrade.patch | 73 + 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+) create mode 100644 package/system/procd/patches/100-sysupgrade.patch diff --git a/package/system/procd/patches/100-sysupgrade.patch b/package/syst

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 3/3] bcm53xx_brcm: add sysupgrade support

2014-05-22 Thread André Valentin
Signed-off-by: André Valentin --- .../base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh | 108 1 file changed, 108 insertions(+) create mode 100755 target/linux/bcm53xx_brcm/base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh diff --git a/target/linux/bcm53xx_brcm/base-files/lib/upgrade/plat

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/3] sysupgrade: add support for running sysupgrade as PID 1

2014-05-22 Thread André Valentin
Signed-off-by: André Valentin --- package/base-files/files/lib/upgrade/common.sh | 32 +++- package/base-files/files/sbin/sysupgrade | 13 ++ 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/package/base-files/files/lib/upgrade/common.sh b/p

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 3/3] bcm53xx_brcm: add sysupgrade support

2014-05-22 Thread Andre Valentin
Hi! I thought about how I could get some kind of transaction safety. I only found this solution: -Look if there is enough extra space for rootfs+sysupgrade.tgz+safety -If yes, create a temporary volume and push the image into it -Mount it -Copy sysupgrade.tgz to its root -unmount it -update kern

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 3/3] bcm53xx_brcm: add sysupgrade support

2014-05-22 Thread Florian Fainelli
2014-05-22 13:16 GMT-07:00 André Valentin : > > Signed-off-by: André Valentin > --- > .../base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh | 108 > > 1 file changed, 108 insertions(+) > create mode 100755 > target/linux/bcm53xx_brcm/base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh > > di

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v5] ppp: add new protocol PPPoSSH.

2014-05-22 Thread Yousong Zhou
Hi, Owen and list. On 23 May 2014 01:22, Owen Kirby wrote: > On 14-05-22 06:01 AM, Yousong Zhou wrote: >> I saw that link too when I found the pvpn project. If I understand >> the theory correctly, the problem is mainly that TCP as a >> connection-oriented protocol is not suitable for being used

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v5] ppp: add new protocol PPPoSSH.

2014-05-22 Thread Joshua Judson Rosen
On 2014-05-22 20:17, Yousong Zhou wrote: I am using PPPoSSH with ipset-enabled dnsmasq [1] mainly for accessing and accelerating the speed of several websites. Well, I myself quite enjoy the outcome. PPPoSSH will not accelerate anything, at best it will allow you to hide your packets from