Can you give this mirror a shot?
http://openwrt.nanobit.org/browser/trunk
It's just the svn repo, and it's not synced on a regular basis, but if
it can handle the load, I can see about improving it.
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Weedy wrote:
> On 16 Mar 2014 06:26, "Hannu Nyman" wrote:
>>
>
uci_file_commit() tries to open and lock a package file (e.g.
/etc/config/system)
before writing into. When the package file doesn't exist, uci fails with
'Entry not found'.
---
file.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/file.c b/file.c
index 36bfdda..04973f3 100644
Patch 642-bridge_port_isolate.patch needs to be updated
for kernels 3.12, 3.13 and 3.14 as the define for BR_ISOLATE_MODE
conflicts with BR_LEARNING
Signed-off-by: Jonas Eymann
---
target/linux/generic/patches-3.12/642-bridge_port_isolate.patch | 2 +-
target/linux/generic/patches-3.13/642-bridg
On 2014-03-14 10:14, Helmut Schaa wrote:
> Introduce a new device event "topology change" that gets signaled
> by bridges on adding/removing members.
>
> On "topology changes" the proto handlers are requested to "renew"
> which is most useful for DHCP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa
[...]
> dif
On 2014-03-19 13:50, Alexander Couzens wrote:
> uci_file_commit() tries to open and lock a package file (e.g.
> /etc/config/system)
> before writing into. When the package file doesn't exist, uci fails with
> 'Entry not found'.
> ---
> file.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2014-03-14 10:14, Helmut Schaa wrote:
>> Introduce a new device event "topology change" that gets signaled
>> by bridges on adding/removing members.
>>
>> On "topology changes" the proto handlers are requested to "renew"
>> which is most u
Committed in r39956
On 2014-03-18 16:43, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> Ping?
>
> On 03/04/2014 06:37 PM, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>> Add a -c switch which allows setting an alternative UCI path instead of using
>> the libuci default.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer
>> ---
>> Hi, this is a l
On 2014-03-12 21:39, Matti Laakso wrote:
> This patch updates ath10k firmware to the latest version, changes the
> default firmware to be the one optimized for access point operation, and
> introduces a configuration option to choose the client-optimized
> firmware instead during build time.
>
> S
Hi.
> Can you give this mirror a shot?
> http://openwrt.nanobit.org/browser/trunk
>
> It's just the svn repo, and it's not synced on a regular basis, but if
> it can handle the load, I can see about improving it.
504 Gateway Time-out
nginx
This was after holding Ctrl-R for 5 seconds.
~ Jow
Hi,
This is a new lua package providing bit operations. It's required for
new luaposix.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Storchak
--
Best regards,
Maxim Storchak
mailto:m.storc...@gmail.com
diff --git a/lang/luabitop/Makefile b/lang/luabitop/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 000..1eccaa9
--- /dev/nu
How much traffic does dev.openwrt.org get to /browser/* on average? (I
am not interested in /chrome/* or other handlers for now)
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi.
>
>> Can you give this mirror a shot?
>> http://openwrt.nanobit.org/browser/trunk
>>
>> It's just the svn
Minor fix to existing patch which did not correctly implement -n support for
the export command in ash. The VEXPORT flag of a variable was set in the first
call to setvareq() and then remained set in the subsequent call, because the
variable already existed in the environment.
Although /lib/fun
Hi,
This is an update for luaposix to v31. It provides more interfaces to
POSIX functions for Lua. There is also a new requirement, luabitop.
Tested on Raspberry Pi in LXC container running OpenWRT.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Storchak
--
Best regards,
Maxim Storchak
mailto:m.storc...@gmail.com
dif
I believe I discovered that interfaces in /etc/config/network and
/etc/config/wireless sharing the same identifier causes a collision of some
sort that can disable all the device's network interfaces, i.e. such that
it no longer even responds to ping on eth0.
Possibly, this is intentional?
For ex
Le 15/02/2014 12:02, Roman Yeryomin a écrit :
> On 14 February 2014 20:43, Mikko Hissa wrote:
>>
>> On 14 Feb 2014, at 01:04, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>>
>>> On 14 February 2014 00:34, Mikko Hissa wrote:
In rt2800lib.c function rt2800_get_txwi_rxwi_size()
Add case MT7620 with RT5592.
>>
Your patch didn't come inline? I haven't tested this out explicitly, but just a
note that this would supersede http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/4990/
Why do you need all the _BASENAME juggling? What is the difference between
"release-v31" and "v31" ?
Sincerely,
Karl P
On 03/19/2014 05:
16 matches
Mail list logo
