On 06/25/2012 03:50 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
On 06/22/2012 08:18 AM, xian...@openmobilefree.net wrote:
From: Xiangfu
---
create mode 100644 target/linux/generic/files/drivers/ieee802154/adf7242.c
create mode 100644 target/linux/generic/files/drivers/ieee802154/at86rf230.c
create mode 10
Hi John
Forget to mention. when I test this. I have to insert the atUSB before system
boot.
Do you have kernel message at serial console? that will help debug. what
modules you
have include in image?
Xiangfu
On 06/24/2012 02:06 PM, John Crispin wrote:
Hi,
i tested on a tplink 3020 which re
On 06/25/2012 05:25 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
Xiangfu (3):
> IEEE802154 WPAN new files
> IEEE802154 WPAN patch
> IEEE802154 WPAN kernel module makefile
Have you considered using compat-wireless to backport 802.15.4 support?
It would probably get a lot less messy than patching the whole thin
On 2012-06-29 9:21 AM, Xiangfu Liu wrote:
> On 06/25/2012 05:25 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>> Xiangfu (3):
>>> > IEEE802154 WPAN new files
>>> > IEEE802154 WPAN patch
>>> > IEEE802154 WPAN kernel module makefile
>> Have you considered using compat-wireless to backport 802.15.4 support?
>> It w
Hello,
On Wednesday 27 June 2012 10:54:46 Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
> Correctly detect CFE bootloaders starting with "cfe-" instead of "cfe-v".
>
> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas
>
> Index: target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-3.3/802-cfe_version_mod.patch
>
The hardware for TP-Link TL-WDR4300 v1.1 and TL-WDR4310 v1.0 is
identical, but requires different firmware headers:
TL-WDR4300:
0040 43 00 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 76 fb 83 40 |C...v..@|
TL-WDR4310:
0040 43 10 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 38 2b 50 6c |C...8+Pl|
Yeah, we can use snprintf ;)
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas
Index: target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-3.3/802-cfe_version_mod.patch
===
--- target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-3.3/802-cfe_version_mod.patch (revisión: 0)
+++ target/linux
Bump klish version to 1.6.0.
This version removes its dependency on the C++ library tinyxml as
it now implements a new XML backend that support some common C-based
XML libraries: libxml2, expat and libroxml. A config option is defined
to let the user select the XML backend he wants to use.
Since
today i installed via serial openwrt trunk r32520 on this
device, images are from:
http://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/kirkwood
openwrt-kirkwood-uImage
openwrt-kirkwood--jffs2-128k.img
picture:
http://i32.tinypic.com/2ntiqkj.jpg
installing via uboot / nandwrite:
https://lists.openwrt.or
On 06/29/2012 09:05 AM, Xiangfu Liu wrote:
> On 06/25/2012 03:50 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>> On 06/22/2012 08:18 AM, xian...@openmobilefree.net wrote:
>>> From: Xiangfu
>>>
>>> ---
>>> create mode 100644
>>> target/linux/generic/files/drivers/ieee802154/adf7242.c
>>> create mode 100644
>>> ta
> Is there anyone in this mailing list tried with this idea? Which
> should
> I start from?
we have this included since a long time:
https://github.com/bittorf/kalua
a good starting point is:
https://github.com/livibetter/bash-oauth/blob/master/OAuth.sh
bye, bastian.
> http://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/kirkwood
> openwrt-kirkwood-uImage
> openwrt-kirkwood--jffs2-128k.img
just for documentation: bootloader is from here:
http://www.cyrius.com/debian/kirkwood/sheevaplug/uboot-upgrade.html
http://people.debian.org/~tbm/u-boot/2011.12-3/dockstar/u-boot.k
> dmesg:
> [0.00] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0
> [0.00] Linux version 3.3.8 (fnord@tschunk) (gcc version
> 4.6.3 20120201 (prerelease) (Linaro GCC 4.6-2012.02) ) #1 Fri Jun
> 29 03:26:51 UTC 2012
> [0.00] CPU: Feroceon 88FR131 [56251311] revision 1
> (ARMv5TE), cr=0005397
Is this patch from february still missing?
http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/734/
bye, bastian
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi Bastian,
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 08:12:59PM +0100, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> > dmesg:
> > [0.00] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0
> > [0.00] Linux version 3.3.8 (fnord@tschunk) (gcc version
> > 4.6.3 20120201 (prerelease) (Linaro GCC 4.6-2012.02) ) #1 Fri Jun
> > 29 03:26:51 UTC 2
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 08:27:47PM +0100, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> Is this patch from february still missing?
> http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/734/
Yes.
bye
MM
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q:
16 matches
Mail list logo