Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Let's fix the OpenWrt patch acceptance problem!

2012-01-25 Thread Paolo Pisati
On 01/25/2012 03:46 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote: > > For those of us that submit fixes that then languish for months before being > committed, wouldn't that mean having to constantly rebase them? i don't think svn as any magic to deal with it either... -- bye, p. _

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Let's fix the OpenWrt patch acceptance problem!

2012-01-25 Thread Christoph Thielecke
Hello Felix, > Does this proposal make sense? Do we have any volunteers that are > willing to organize and take care of maintaining the tree and compile > testing and reviewing the incoming changes? I can offer to help with brcm47xx, x86. Also, I working on webif package (just for your interest).

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] wait for blockdevice mtd2block (useful for usbboot)

2012-01-25 Thread Christoph Thielecke
Hello, I'm working on x86 using usb for boot. It works for me if usb and usb-storage drivers enabled via make kernel_menuconfig. One thing I had to fix for get it working: mtd2block does not long enough until usb has been up. This patch was made against 2.6.32 at 10.03 (put in target/linux/ge

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Let's fix the OpenWrt patch acceptance problem!

2012-01-25 Thread Dave Taht
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote: > On 1/24/12 6:06 AM, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: >> I also see svn as part of the problem. I think a move towards the >> linux-kernel development model would be a great benefit. >> >> Using git would allow users to make many small fixes in t

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] x86 sysupgrade

2012-01-25 Thread Martin Roecker
Hi, On 23.01.2012 07:28, Philip Prindeville wrote: For those of us using x86-based platforms we'd like to have a way to > do in-place upgrades without losing configuration state. How do you perform your updates at the moment? I ask because the only way to write a new image to my Alix 2D13 ist

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Add mostly complete support for Sitecom WL-341 v3 and other Sercomm IP1006RRv2 based boards

2012-01-25 Thread Roman Yeryomin
On 24 January 2012 03:39, Marco Antonio Mauro wrote: >> Leds are tested in output mode which you are skipping. >> If you are testing leds only you should be skipping input mode, not >> output, and see which led blinks (it should blink 3 times if you don't >> interrupt it). > > The thing is that it

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ramips: Rework ramips_eth to not require irqsave locking anymore

2012-01-25 Thread Roman Yeryomin
On 23 January 2012 16:26, Helmut Schaa wrote: >> Well, ok, I'll retest everything again (a bit later) and let you know >> the results. > > Ok, thanks. It could be that you were right that my testing environment/hardware is not good enough. When I started to use iperf wireless card (well, probably

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] x86 sysupgrade

2012-01-25 Thread Roberto Riggio
I'm actually using sysupgrade on an alix 2c board and it works. I'm not keeping the actual configuration instead i have a script that: 1. downloads a new configuration from a server (a tar.gz) 2. downloads the new image 3. runs sysupgrade with the option to use an external archive for the confi

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Buffalo WZR-HP-G450H support question

2012-01-25 Thread Gregory Finch
On 2012-01-24 6:57 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > Hi, >> Specifically, I'm lacking the ability to change channels (the >> important part) > option channel ? >> and have no ability to control antenna chains or adjust power. > option txpower, option rxantenna and option txantenna? >> What can I do to

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ar71xx: add support for Compex WPE72/WPE72NX

2012-01-25 Thread Johnathan Boyce
This patch adds support for Compex WPE72 bare board and Compex WPE72NX Indoor Access Point. Signed-off-by: Johnathan Boyce > --- Index: target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ar71xx/mach-wpe72.c

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Buffalo WZR-HP-G450H support question

2012-01-25 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2012-01-25 6:38 PM, Gregory Finch wrote: > On 2012-01-24 6:57 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: >> Hi, >>> Specifically, I'm lacking the ability to change channels (the >>> important part) >> option channel ? >>> and have no ability to control antenna chains or adjust power. >> option txpower, option

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Buffalo WZR-HP-G450H support question

2012-01-25 Thread Gregory Finch
On 2012-01-25 11:19 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2012-01-25 6:38 PM, Gregory Finch wrote: >> On 2012-01-24 6:57 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: >>> Hi, Specifically, I'm lacking the ability to change channels (the important part) >>> option channel ? and have no ability to control anten

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] DSL support and luci integration

2012-01-25 Thread Andrew Lyon
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:51 PM, wrote: > Hi, > > I've been using trunk on a Buffalo WBMR-HP-G300H ADSL router with great > success, so I've been looking at the existing DSL support and am keen to > help out getting it better integrated. Could you explain or point me in the direction of document

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] DSL support and luci integration

2012-01-25 Thread Lee Essen
Hi Andy, I posted a brief summary on the openwrt 'General' forum earlier today ... it's brief but will hopefully help. I've done 2 now, only bricked one (by experimenting) and the serial cable makes it pretty easy to recover. Cheers, Lee. On 25 Jan 2012, at 22:01, Andrew Lyon wrote: > On T

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] x86 sysupgrade

2012-01-25 Thread Philip Prindeville
On 1/25/12 7:58 AM, Martin Roecker wrote: > Hi, > > On 23.01.2012 07:28, Philip Prindeville wrote: >> For those of us using x86-based platforms we'd like to have a way to > > do in-place upgrades without losing configuration state. > > How do you perform your updates at the moment? I ask because

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Let's fix the OpenWrt patch acceptance problem!

2012-01-25 Thread Philip Prindeville
On 1/25/12 5:30 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > "A second, large problem (in my mind), is that I would like to find a > process for getting stuff upstream into the mainline kernel." > > Returning to handling the patch backlog: > > One way to perhaps help this is for the overall schedule to be more > widel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Let's fix the OpenWrt patch acceptance problem!

2012-01-25 Thread Peter Naulls
On 01/25/2012 02:50 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: I'm told that my patches languish because they are for 2.6.39.4 (or whatever) and I'm encouraged to go to a newer kernel... but I can't because all of the churn with the ath9k goes untested and tends to be extremely destabilizing to the ath5k d

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OpenWrt-Users] Serious business hardware

2012-01-25 Thread Weedy
On 23/01/12 04:34 AM, Russell Senior wrote: >> "Weedy" == Weedy writes: > Requirements: - 500mhz or more - 128mb ram+, DDR+ - 32mb flash - 2 gigabit ports (but I would like 4) - 1 minipci, bonus points for more - cf/sd card slot - available enclosure that isn't more

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Let's fix the OpenWrt patch acceptance problem!

2012-01-25 Thread Philip Prindeville
On 1/25/12 4:07 PM, Peter Naulls wrote: > Right, this sounds familiar, except it's with e/glibc stuff. No one > much has tested it because it's not in SVN, etc. Moreover, it doesn't > affect most users, and without them, e/glibc doesn't work at all. I build with eglibc because I need the g729 co

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ramips: Rework ramips_eth to not require irqsave locking anymore

2012-01-25 Thread Helmut Schaa
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Roman Yeryomin wrote: > On 23 January 2012 16:26, Helmut Schaa wrote: >>> Well, ok, I'll retest everything again (a bit later) and let you know >>> the results. >> >> Ok, thanks. > > It could be that you were right that my testing environment/hardware > is not goo