Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] patchwork for openwrt

2010-05-10 Thread Raphaël HUCK
Le Fri, 07 May 2010 12:24:29 +0200, j...@phrozen.org a écrit : > Hi, > > http://patchwork.cyranjo.org > > John > > Hi John, this is great! But why not http://patchwork.openwrt.org? Also a problem with patchwork is that it exposes email adresses to anyone with simple mailto: links in clear.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] patchwork for openwrt

2010-05-10 Thread john
Quoting Raphaël HUCK : Le Fri, 07 May 2010 12:24:29 +0200, j...@phrozen.org a écrit : Hi, http://patchwork.cyranjo.org John Hi John, this is great! But why not http://patchwork.openwrt.org? you probably missed the bit where i said we have it in testing Also a problem with patchwork

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] patchwork for openwrt

2010-05-10 Thread Quentin Armitage
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 10:44 +0200, j...@phrozen.org wrote: > Quoting Raphaël HUCK : > > > Le Fri, 07 May 2010 12:24:29 +0200, > > j...@phrozen.org a écrit : > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> http://patchwork.cyranjo.org > >> > >> John > >> > >> > > This is really excellent. It would be really good if it cou

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] patchwork for openwrt

2010-05-10 Thread john
Yes, great idea. i will be in berlin at the wcw on the weekend. there i will be meeting CyrusFF who is currently hosting the patchwork installation. i will then discuss next steps with him and also talk to bartman/kaloz about a dns entry pointing at that ip i'll keep you updated. -- Joh

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-10 Thread Stefan Monnier
> In 'make menuconfig' I included them with 'Y' instead of 'M'. > According to my (newbie) knowledge that adds them to the kernel image. > Can somebody please confirm my understanding? Or at least prove me wrong? :D Damn! I thought you had found a clever way to get them compiled into the kernel. I

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-10 Thread edgar . soldin
there is partly in https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/include/kernel-defaults.mk line 101 you can actually add CONFIG_KERNEL_* entries to your .config and they are copied over as CONFIG_* to the kernel config. All that's missing is a menuconfig interface for that. But at least for routers u

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-10 Thread Matthias Buecher / Germany
It may not downsize the packages themselves, but moving kernel mods from rootfs to the kernel image will reduce the rootfs size. Leaving more space for JFFS2 rootfs_data. Having a "K" setting for kernel options would be great. Will try to have a look at it during the next weeks. Thanks for all yo

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ar71xx: fix nbg460n mtd partitions

2010-05-10 Thread Michael Kurz
This fixes the NBG460N/550N/550NH mtd partitions. Signed-off-by: Michael Kurz --- target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ar71xx/mach-nbg460n.c | 17 +++--- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Index: target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ar71xx/mach-nbg460n.c

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-10 Thread edgar . soldin
but wouldn't the increase in the kernel image actually equal the decrease in the squash image and therefore the size of the rootfs_data stay the same? Both are lzma compressed. ..ede On 10.05.2010 19:16, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote: > It may not downsize the packages themselves, but moving

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-10 Thread Matthias Buecher / Germany
Kernel and rootfs are in two different mtd partitions on the WRT54G: # dmesg ... Creating 5 MTD partitions on "Physically mapped flash": 0x-0x0004 : "cfe" 0x0004-0x003f : "linux" 0x000bc000-0x0021 : "rootfs" mtd: partition "rootfs" doesn't start on an erase block boundary -

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-10 Thread edgar . soldin
are these sizes fixed or calculated according the space requirement? Looks like the linux size is fixed, what is the maximum size for a kernel on wrt54g? .. ede On 10.05.2010 23:28, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote: > Kernel and rootfs are in two different mtd partitions on the WRT54G: > > # dme

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-10 Thread Matthias Buecher / Germany
The "linux" partition spans over the kernel and the complete rootfs for flashing. The maximum kernel size is 0x000bc000 (begin of "rootfs") minus 0x0004 (begin of "linux") equals 0x0007c000 (496KB). Maddes On 10.05.2010 23:34, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: > are these sizes fixed or calculated a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-10 Thread Bernhard Loos
2010/5/10 Matthias Buecher / Germany : > The "linux" partition spans over the kernel and the complete rootfs for > flashing. > The maximum kernel size is 0x000bc000 (begin of "rootfs") minus > 0x0004 (begin of "linux") equals 0x0007c000 (496KB). > > Maddes This is not the maximum kernel size,

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-10 Thread edgar . soldin
Then it'd make total sense to stuff in whatever fits there .. thanks for the enlightenment, ede On 10.05.2010 23:38, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote: > The "linux" partition spans over the kernel and the complete rootfs for > flashing. > The maximum kernel size is 0x000bc000 (begin of "rootfs") m

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-10 Thread Bernhard Loos
2010/5/10 Bernhard Loos : > 2010/5/10 Matthias Buecher / Germany : >> The "linux" partition spans over the kernel and the complete rootfs for >> flashing. >> The maximum kernel size is 0x000bc000 (begin of "rootfs") minus >> 0x0004 (begin of "linux") equals 0x0007c000 (496KB). >> >> Maddes > >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-10 Thread Matthias Buecher / Germany
On 10.05.2010 23:47, Bernhard Loos wrote: > 2010/5/10 Bernhard Loos : >> 2010/5/10 Matthias Buecher / Germany : >>> The "linux" partition spans over the kernel and the complete rootfs for >>> flashing. >>> The maximum kernel size is 0x000bc000 (begin of "rootfs") minus >>> 0x0004 (begin of "lin

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

2010-05-10 Thread edgar . soldin
On 10.05.2010 23:47, Bernhard Loos wrote: > 2010/5/10 Bernhard Loos : >> 2010/5/10 Matthias Buecher / Germany : >>> The "linux" partition spans over the kernel and the complete rootfs for >>> flashing. >>> The maximum kernel size is 0x000bc000 (begin of "rootfs") minus >>> 0x0004 (begin of "lin