Denver Gingerich wrote:
>> It turns out that the switch in question is a process by which it
>> turns itself off momentarily to change to the correct vlan. This is a
>> local, IETF hackthon setting. This cuts the PoE power, and so a cycle
>> ensues when depending upon PoE only.
Denver Gingerich wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 06:41:15AM +0700, Michael Richardson wrote:
Michael Richardson wrote:
> With the cable in the PoE port, the device was in a reboot cycle.
It turns out that the switch in question is a process by which it turns
itself off momentarily to chang
On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 06:41:15AM +0700, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Michael Richardson wrote:
> > With the cable in the PoE port, the device was in a reboot cycle.
>
> It turns out that the switch in question is a process by which it turns
> itself off momentarily to change to the correc
Michael Richardson wrote:
> With the cable in the PoE port, the device was in a reboot cycle.
It turns out that the switch in question is a process by which it turns
itself off momentarily to change to the correct vlan. This is a local, IETF
hackthon setting. This cuts the PoE power, and s
ichael Richardson ,
>>openwrt-de...@openwrt.org
>> Subject: Re: openwrt ONE: not getting enough PoE power
>> The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
>> sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header
ichael Richardson ,
>>openwrt-de...@openwrt.org
>> Subject: Re: openwrt ONE: not getting enough PoE power
>> The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
>> sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header
On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 06:27:38AM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> I think the concern being raised is why didn't it power itself via the USB
> port even if the PoE was low.
+1
>
> Also, I don't have mine handy, but is the PoE module plugged in or soldered
> in? I thought it was a plugin
It's solder
evel wrote:
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 10:15:37 +0100
From: Sebastian Moeller via openwrt-devel
Reply-To: Sebastian Moeller
To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org, Michael Richardson ,
openwrt-de...@openwrt.org
Subject: Re: openwrt ONE: not getting enough PoE power
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
Hi Michael,
my oldish zyxel PoE s
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
Hi Michael,
my oldish zyxel PoE s
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
Am 15. März 2025 04:54:15 MEZ schr
I brought an OpenWRT One to IETF122 Hackathon.
I plugged the 2.5Gb/s port into the IETF hackathon network, and the switch
apparently has PoE (which I didn't care about). I hooked up the rest of the
cables,
including the USB power, but didn't turn it on yet. I was surprised when I
opened the co
12 matches
Mail list logo
