> It works quite fine, and it's harmless.
I’d do that and bump the target to 5.10. that should give us a good chance to
fork soonish
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-deve
El lun, 14 feb 2022 a las 20:34, Florian Fainelli
() escribió:
>
> On 2/14/22 11:07 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> > On 2/4/22 00:48, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> We would like to switch the bcm63xx target to kernel 5.10. Paul
> >> created a pull request for that:
> >> https://github.com/o
On 2/14/22 11:07 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 2/4/22 00:48, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We would like to switch the bcm63xx target to kernel 5.10. Paul
>> created a pull request for that:
>> https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/4616
>>
>> There is still a problem with Macronix NAND flas
On 2/4/22 00:48, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
Hi,
We would like to switch the bcm63xx target to kernel 5.10. Paul created
a pull request for that:
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/4616
There is still a problem with Macronix NAND flash chips, see the
comments from the pull request.
Could so
I've made more tests, with previous patches together with the last
ones. Backported 22ca05b and a071912 without luck. Then I commented
out the macronix_nand_block_protection_support(chip) at the
nand_macronix driver, but this time it didn't boot:
[0.837831] bcm6368_nand 1200.nand: there
Hi Florian,
El mar, 8 feb 2022 a las 17:19, Florian Fainelli
() escribió:
>
>
>
> On 2/4/2022 2:57 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2/4/2022 2:50 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/4/2022 2:45 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 2/4/2022 2:34 PM, Daniel González
On 2/4/2022 2:57 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 2/4/2022 2:50 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 2/4/2022 2:45 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 2/4/2022 2:34 PM, Daniel González Cabanelas wrote:
El vie, 4 feb 2022 a las 23:02, Florian Fainelli
() escribió:
On 2/4/2022 11:21 AM, Álvaro Fe
Still no luck. I tested it together with the macronix patch and it
throws the same error.
[0.936695] CPU 0 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual
address 004c, epc == 80064ff0, ra == 80066fd4
[0.947583] Oops[#1]:
[0.949918] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.
On 2/4/2022 2:50 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 2/4/2022 2:45 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 2/4/2022 2:34 PM, Daniel González Cabanelas wrote:
El vie, 4 feb 2022 a las 23:02, Florian Fainelli
() escribió:
On 2/4/2022 11:21 AM, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
So the problem is that SET_
On 2/4/2022 2:45 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 2/4/2022 2:34 PM, Daniel González Cabanelas wrote:
El vie, 4 feb 2022 a las 23:02, Florian Fainelli
() escribió:
On 2/4/2022 11:21 AM, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
So the problem is that SET_FEATURES and GET_FEATURES isn’t supported
by ve
On 2/4/2022 2:34 PM, Daniel González Cabanelas wrote:
El vie, 4 feb 2022 a las 23:02, Florian Fainelli
() escribió:
On 2/4/2022 11:21 AM, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
So the problem is that SET_FEATURES and GET_FEATURES isn’t supported by
versions 2.1, 2.2 and 4.0 of the nand controller,
El vie, 4 feb 2022 a las 23:02, Florian Fainelli
() escribió:
>
>
>
> On 2/4/2022 11:21 AM, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
> > So the problem is that SET_FEATURES and GET_FEATURES isn’t supported by
> > versions 2.1, 2.2 and 4.0 of the nand controller, which are the ones
> > present on bcm63xx, ri
On 2/4/2022 11:21 AM, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
So the problem is that SET_FEATURES and GET_FEATURES isn’t supported by
versions 2.1, 2.2 and 4.0 of the nand controller, which are the ones present on
bcm63xx, right?
Yes, I suspect this is the problem since I do not see CMD_LOW_LEVEL_OP
So the problem is that SET_FEATURES and GET_FEATURES isn’t supported by
versions 2.1, 2.2 and 4.0 of the nand controller, which are the ones present on
bcm63xx, right?
> El 4 feb 2022, a las 13:55, Daniel González Cabanelas
> escribió:
>
> Hi Florian,
>> El vie, 4 feb 2022 a las 19:24, Flori
Hi Florian,
El vie, 4 feb 2022 a las 19:24, Florian Fainelli
() escribió:
>
>
>
> On 2/4/2022 9:28 AM, Daniel González Cabanelas wrote:
> > Hi Hauke:
> >
> > El vie, 4 feb 2022 a las 0:48, Hauke Mehrtens () escribió:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> We would like to switch the bcm63xx target to kernel 5.10.
On 2/4/2022 10:47 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
On 2/4/22 19:23, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 2/4/2022 9:28 AM, Daniel González Cabanelas wrote:
Hi Hauke:
El vie, 4 feb 2022 a las 0:48, Hauke Mehrtens ()
escribió:
Hi,
We would like to switch the bcm63xx target to kernel 5.10. Paul created
a
On 2/4/22 19:23, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 2/4/2022 9:28 AM, Daniel González Cabanelas wrote:
Hi Hauke:
El vie, 4 feb 2022 a las 0:48, Hauke Mehrtens ()
escribió:
Hi,
We would like to switch the bcm63xx target to kernel 5.10. Paul created
a pull request for that:
https://github.com/openw
On 2/4/2022 9:28 AM, Daniel González Cabanelas wrote:
Hi Hauke:
El vie, 4 feb 2022 a las 0:48, Hauke Mehrtens () escribió:
Hi,
We would like to switch the bcm63xx target to kernel 5.10. Paul created
a pull request for that:
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/4616
There is still a prob
Hi Hauke:
El vie, 4 feb 2022 a las 0:48, Hauke Mehrtens () escribió:
>
> Hi,
>
> We would like to switch the bcm63xx target to kernel 5.10. Paul created
> a pull request for that:
> https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/4616
>
> There is still a problem with Macronix NAND flash chips, see the
>
Hi,
First of all, excuse me for not taking care of this before.
I’ve been a bit busy lately because I bought a house and I had to do a lot of
stuff to get it into a proper condition.
I also got COVID and had to pospone a trip to Mexico (which I’m enjoying right
now).
As soon as I get back from M
Hi,
We would like to switch the bcm63xx target to kernel 5.10. Paul created
a pull request for that:
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/4616
There is still a problem with Macronix NAND flash chips, see the
comments from the pull request.
Could someone please have a look into this probl
21 matches
Mail list logo
