On Thursday, 2 May 2024 09:25:03 CEST Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:36:47 CEST Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> > On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CEST Kalle Valo wrote:
> > > It's quite strange that they updated 2.5.0.1 branch first but my
> > > understanding that there should be upd
On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:36:47 CEST Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CEST Kalle Valo wrote:
> > It's quite strange that they updated 2.5.0.1 branch first but my
> > understanding that there should be updates for the newer 2.7.0.1 branch
> > as well (2.7.0.1 branch is als
Il giorno mar 30 apr 2024 alle ore 15:04 Kalle Valo
ha scritto:
>
> Robert Marko writes:
>
> > On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 10:48, Kalle Valo wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Robert Marko writes:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 15:37, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CE
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 15:02, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
> Robert Marko writes:
>
> > On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 10:48, Kalle Valo wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Robert Marko writes:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 15:37, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CEST Kalle Valo wr
Robert Marko writes:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 10:48, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
>>
>> Robert Marko writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 15:37, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CEST Kalle Valo wrote:
>> >> > It's quite strange that they updated 2.5.0.1 branch first
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 10:48, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
> Robert Marko writes:
>
> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 15:37, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> >>
> >> On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CEST Kalle Valo wrote:
> >> > It's quite strange that they updated 2.5.0.1 branch first but my
> >> > understanding that
Robert Marko writes:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 15:37, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CEST Kalle Valo wrote:
>> > It's quite strange that they updated 2.5.0.1 branch first but my
>> > understanding that there should be updates for the newer 2.7.0.1 branch
>> > as wel
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 15:37, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
>
> On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CEST Kalle Valo wrote:
> > It's quite strange that they updated 2.5.0.1 branch first but my
> > understanding that there should be updates for the newer 2.7.0.1 branch
> > as well (2.7.0.1 branch is also in l
On Monday, 29 April 2024 15:14:18 CEST Kalle Valo wrote:
> It's quite strange that they updated 2.5.0.1 branch first but my
> understanding that there should be updates for the newer 2.7.0.1 branch
> as well (2.7.0.1 branch is also in linux-firmware).
Yes, I also told them in the support ticket th
Kalle Valo writes:
> + ath11k, jeff
>
> Sven Eckelmann writes:
>
>> On Monday, 26 February 2024 15:50:44 CET Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> [...]
The Qualcomm bulletin[1] says "Patches are being actively
>>> > shared with OEMs".
>>> >
>>> > Were these bugfixes made available for OpenWRT? Is there
+ ath11k, jeff
Sven Eckelmann writes:
> On Monday, 26 February 2024 15:50:44 CET Felix Fietkau wrote:
> [...]
>>> The Qualcomm bulletin[1] says "Patches are being actively
>> > shared with OEMs".
>> >
>> > Were these bugfixes made available for OpenWRT? Is there an established
>> > procedure fo
On Monday, 26 February 2024 15:50:44 CET Felix Fietkau wrote:
[...]
>> The Qualcomm bulletin[1] says "Patches are being actively
> > shared with OEMs".
> >
> > Were these bugfixes made available for OpenWRT? Is there an established
> > procedure for such cases, where closed-source firmware gets bu
On 26.02.24 11:45, Tanjeff Moos wrote:
Hi all,
Qualcomm has bugs in the closed-source firmware for their WLAN and LTE
hardware. The Qualcomm bulletin[1] says "Patches are being actively
shared with OEMs".
Were these bugfixes made available for OpenWRT? Is there an established
procedure for such
13 matches
Mail list logo