On 4 July 2014 09:35, John Crispin wrote:
> applied in r41505
>
Thanks!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
applied in r41505
On 04/07/2014 00:24, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> On 16 April 2014 11:17, Bastian Bittorf
> wrote:
>> * Roman Yeryomin [16.04.2014 09:34]:
>>> Also pci seems to be broken as neither miniPCI slots nor VIA
>>> ethernet ports are not working:
>
> I've tested this and it works fine:
>
On 16 April 2014 11:17, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> * Roman Yeryomin [16.04.2014 09:34]:
>> Also pci seems to be broken as neither miniPCI slots nor VIA ethernet
>> ports are not working:
I've tested this and it works fine: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/6940/
Gabor, any reason it's still n
On 16 April 2014 11:17, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> * Roman Yeryomin [16.04.2014 09:34]:
>> Also pci seems to be broken as neither miniPCI slots nor VIA ethernet
>> ports are not working:
>
> can you please try to fiddle in:
> http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/4087/
>
Looks like not our case.
P
* Roman Yeryomin [16.04.2014 09:34]:
> Also pci seems to be broken as neither miniPCI slots nor VIA ethernet
> ports are not working:
can you please try to fiddle in:
http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/4087/
bye, bastian
___
openwrt-devel mailing li
On 11 April 2014 23:13, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> On 11 April 2014 23:07, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
>> * Roman Yeryomin [11.04.2014 20:18]:
>>> > seems generating the rootfs is broken for you somehow.
>>>
>>> ptgen fault?
>>> I have 64bit environment if that matters...
>>
>> please go into 'target/li
On 11 April 2014 23:07, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> * Roman Yeryomin [11.04.2014 20:18]:
>> > seems generating the rootfs is broken for you somehow.
>>
>> ptgen fault?
>> I have 64bit environment if that matters...
>
> please go into 'target/linux/rb532/image/gen_image.sh' and
> before ptgen, insert
* Roman Yeryomin [11.04.2014 20:18]:
> > seems generating the rootfs is broken for you somehow.
>
> ptgen fault?
> I have 64bit environment if that matters...
please go into 'target/linux/rb532/image/gen_image.sh' and
before ptgen, insert this:
echo >>/tmp/BLA "OUTPUT=$OUTPUT KERNELSIZE=$KERNEL
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> * Roman Yeryomin [11.04.2014 20:18]:
>> .and panicked about 10 minutes later:
>> http://pastebin.com/vuABEvPE
>
> we should made this discussion offlist via PM!
Why? This is potentially interesting stuff for other rb532 users, so
why
* Roman Yeryomin [11.04.2014 20:18]:
> .and panicked about 10 minutes later:
> http://pastebin.com/vuABEvPE
we should made this discussion offlist via PM!
this crash is enforced from a special script, read
the log carefully: system_crashreboot() reason: olsrd missing
so dont mind, it's work
On 11 April 2014 19:52, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> On 11 April 2014 19:13, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
>> * Roman Yeryomin [11.04.2014 17:56]:
>>> Tried jffs2 image - same result.
>>> Could it be because I have 532A version? That one was with bigger RAM
>>> (64M) with no other differences (as far as I k
On 11 April 2014 19:13, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> * Roman Yeryomin [11.04.2014 17:56]:
>> Tried jffs2 image - same result.
>> Could it be because I have 532A version? That one was with bigger RAM
>> (64M) with no other differences (as far as I know).
>> Images here:
>> https://box.tet.rtu.lv/publi
* Roman Yeryomin [11.04.2014 17:56]:
> Tried jffs2 image - same result.
> Could it be because I have 532A version? That one was with bigger RAM
> (64M) with no other differences (as far as I know).
> Images here:
> https://box.tet.rtu.lv/public.php?service=files&t=1ed7993af28d2878e315eb415bea45c5
On 11 April 2014 18:39, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> On 11 April 2014 17:54, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
>> * Roman Yeryomin [11.04.2014 16:48]:
>>> > at the moment i dont have time for this, but if somebody like,
>>> > SSH-access and SSH to serial-line is possible (screen-session).
>>>
>>> Did you fix an
On 11 April 2014 17:54, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> * Roman Yeryomin [11.04.2014 16:48]:
>> > at the moment i dont have time for this, but if somebody like,
>> > SSH-access and SSH to serial-line is possible (screen-session).
>>
>> Did you fix anything to boot it?
>
> no, i just removed the broken-f
* Roman Yeryomin [11.04.2014 16:48]:
> > at the moment i dont have time for this, but if somebody like,
> > SSH-access and SSH to serial-line is possible (screen-session).
>
> Did you fix anything to boot it?
no, i just removed the broken-flag and started the build.
> Mine says (with both ext4
On 11 April 2014 11:58, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> * Roman Yeryomin [11.04.2014 10:45]:
>> I would even use it if it really works...
>
> For now, it boots fine via ethernet and/or Compact-flash
> but only 1 ethernet-port is working.
> my two ath5k-cards (R52) are not detected and it seems
> to be s
* Roman Yeryomin [11.04.2014 10:45]:
> I would even use it if it really works...
For now, it boots fine via ethernet and/or Compact-flash
but only 1 ethernet-port is working.
my two ath5k-cards (R52) are not detected and it seems
to be somehow like this:
http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/408
On 11 April 2014 00:19, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 2014-04-10 13:39 GMT-07:00 Roman Yeryomin :
>> On 9 April 2014 15:55, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
>>> * Imre Kaloz [09.04.2014 14:53]:
Because no one tested it since the kernel has been upgraded, and we don't
have a board to do anymore ;)
>
2014-04-10 13:39 GMT-07:00 Roman Yeryomin :
> On 9 April 2014 15:55, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
>> * Imre Kaloz [09.04.2014 14:53]:
>>> Because no one tested it since the kernel has been upgraded, and we don't
>>> have a board to do anymore ;)
>>
>> ok, will do some more tests and send a patch with
On 9 April 2014 15:55, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> * Imre Kaloz [09.04.2014 14:53]:
>> Because no one tested it since the kernel has been upgraded, and we don't
>> have a board to do anymore ;)
>
> ok, will do some more tests and send a patch with re-enables it.
> (board will run in our testnet)
>
* Imre Kaloz [09.04.2014 14:53]:
> Because no one tested it since the kernel has been upgraded, and we don't
> have a board to do anymore ;)
ok, will do some more tests and send a patch with re-enables it.
(board will run in our testnet)
bye, bastian
On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 14:39:04 +0200, Bastian Bittorf
wrote:
why is it marked as 'broken'? i just compiled it with
trunk r40422/kernel 3.10.34 and it boots fine.
Because no one tested it since the kernel has been upgraded, and we don't have
a board to do anymore ;)
Imre
23 matches
Mail list logo
