On 29 May 2017 at 09:03, John Crispin wrote:
> (resend, this time as plain text)
>
>
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber that
> post remerge anything can be voted on, so clutterin
On 13/06/17 21:58, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/28/2017 11:56 PM, John Crispin wrote:
Hi,
here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering t
On 05/28/2017 11:56 PM, John Crispin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
> that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the proposal
> with many details will d
Hi,
NACK from me - not that it makes a difference but I do not like to
operate under the OpenWrt name.
~ Jo
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Mon, 29 May 2017 09:03:57 +0200
John Crispin wrote:
> (resend, this time as plain text)
>
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the
> comments people made into it, if anything is missing let me know.
> Please remeber that post remerge anything can be voted on, s
On 29.05.2017 09:03, John Crispin wrote:
(resend, this time as plain text)
Hi,
here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the proposal
wi
On 29 May 2017 at 09:03, John Crispin wrote:
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber that
> post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the proposal with many
> details will delay th
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:03 AM, John Crispin wrote:
> (resend, this time as plain text)
>
>
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber that
> post remerge anything can be voted on, so c
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 09:03:57AM +0200, John Crispin wrote:
> (resend, this time as plain text)
>
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber that
> post remerge anything can be voted
On 05/29/2017 09:03 AM, John Crispin wrote:
> (resend, this time as plain text)
>
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
> that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering
On 29-05-17 09:03, John Crispin wrote:
> (resend, this time as plain text)
>
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please
> remeber that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering the
> p
On 05/29/2017 09:03 AM, John Crispin wrote:
> (resend, this time as plain text)
>
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
> that post remerge anything can be voted on, so cluttering
On 29/05/17 10:39, Tom Psyborg wrote:
Compared to Flyspray, Trac is a nightmare to administer. It leaks
resources like a sieve and tends to slow down to a crawl under load.
Regards,
Jo
Could you be more specific? I don't see how can it leak resources.
About slow down, hav
> Compared to Flyspray, Trac is a nightmare to administer. It leaks
> resources like a sieve and tends to slow down to a crawl under load.
>
> Regards,
> Jo
>
>
Could you be more specific? I don't see how can it leak resources. About
slow down, have you ever chekced the server it is hosted on, or c
Hi Tom,
> I'd vote for re-enabling trac for all users, instead of wasting time and
> resources on another flyspray instance or even existing one which
> compared to trac does not bring any breakthrough features.
Compared to Flyspray, Trac is a nightmare to administer. It leaks
resources like a si
On 29 May 2017 at 08:56, John Crispin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
> people made into it, if anything is missing let me know.
>
> *) trac
> - trac is already readonly, keep content so that search engines can still
> find the it
> - edit t
16 matches
Mail list logo
