Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Support for Nanostation M2 devices

2014-06-10 Thread valent.turko...@gmail.com
I got a batch of 10 Nanostation loco M2 devices produced in 2014 and I can confirm that they run OpenWrt without problem. I have updated OpenWrt Wiki with all information I have found out so far: http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/ubiquiti/nanostationm2 Thank you all for your information and sorry for t

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Support for Nanostation M2 devices

2014-06-03 Thread Imre Kaloz
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:28:25 +0200, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: Another confirmation that they have switched boards and probably also SoC, from Ubnt forums: https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-General-Discussion/Differencens-between-XM-XW-and-TI-firmwares/td-p/752296/page/2 So nobody fr

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Support for Nanostation M2 devices

2014-06-03 Thread valent.turko...@gmail.com
Another confirmation that they have switched boards and probably also SoC, from Ubnt forums: https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-General-Discussion/Differencens-between-XM-XW-and-TI-firmwares/td-p/752296/page/2 So nobody from dev team has worked on these new Ubiquiti devices?

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Support for Nanostation M2 devices

2014-06-02 Thread valent.turko...@gmail.com
Got first reply from Ubiquiti support: "Hi Valent, Thanks for getting in touch with us! Yes, we have come up with the new board for these devices. Just for easy understanding the devices with the xw firmware run on the latest motherboard. eg: http://www.ubnt.com/download#NanoStation:M5. You'll s

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Support for Nanostation M2 devices

2014-06-02 Thread Russell Senior
> "valent" == valent turkovic@gmail com writes: valent>@Gregor from Wlan Slovenia showed mi his boot log and I valent> found here some references that other people are starting to valent> notice change from ar724 to ar934x on their Ubiquiti devices: valent> http://community.tanaza.com/ta

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Support for Nanostation M2 devices

2014-06-02 Thread Rip Route
FYI: AR7241, AR7242, AR9130, and AR9132 were all discontinued as of December 31, 2013. Manufacturers could place orders for these parts up until 12/31/2013 with a delivery scheduled until 9/20/2014. On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:46 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com < valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Support for Nanostation M2 devices

2014-06-02 Thread valent.turko...@gmail.com
@Gregor from Wlan Slovenia showed mi his boot log and I found here some references that other people are starting to notice change from ar724 to ar934x on their Ubiquiti devices: http://community.tanaza.com/tanaza/topics/installing_tanaza_firmware_on_unifi_ap http://www.wifi4you.com/Amp/UBiQUiTi-Fi

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Support for Nanostation M2 devices

2014-06-02 Thread Felix Kaechele
On 03.06.2014 00:05 valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: > Did anybody have chance to test Nanostation M2 devices produced in 2014? > Is it true that Ubiquiti changes SoC type and that current model is not > supported in OpenWrt? Well I have some 4 NSM2 and 6 NSM5 loco manufactured in August 2013 and

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Support for Nanostation M2 devices

2014-06-02 Thread valent.turko...@gmail.com
Gregor from wlan slovenia says that new Nanostation devices now have Atheros ar934x and not ar71xx any more... Is ar934x supported in OpenWrt? On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:05 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com < valent.turko...@gmail.com> wrote: > Did anybody have chance to test Nanostation M2 devices p