Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt Roadmap

2018-12-03 Thread Fernando Frediani
Has this discussion gone anywhere ? Are we keeping LEDE 17.01 for a little while under these conditions or not ? Regards Fernando On 12/11/2018 18:57, Fernando Frediani wrote: Totally agree with Luiz. That was the idea behind this proposal and you managed to even easier words. Alberto, the t

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt Roadmap

2018-11-13 Thread Rosen Penev
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:13 AM Fernando Frediani wrote: > > Hi. > > I think there is a little misunderstanding about this topic. > As many know here for OpenWrt doesn't quiet work as the same for a > company's project where you may have dedicated people to a project. > People work in the stuff t

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt Roadmap

2018-11-13 Thread Fernando Frediani
Hi. I think there is a little misunderstanding about this topic. As many know here for OpenWrt doesn't quiet work as the same for a company's project where you may have dedicated people to a project. People work in the stuff they get interested and give some attention to whatever is agreed by

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt Roadmap

2018-11-12 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 12/11/18 21:40, John Clark wrote: We are talking of embedded hardware, stuff that can be replaced with future-proof hardware (4+ years) for 20-30$ in most cases. I don't think it is worth the manpower required to have any real attempt at a LTS (i.e. backporting security fixes). I supp

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt Roadmap

2018-11-12 Thread David Lang
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018, Alberto Bursi wrote: I quite frankly don't believe it's worth allocating what limited manpower there is. While I'm not a OpenWrt developer and I don't speak on behalf of the project, I really believe that you are underestimating the effort required behind even a basic LTS

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt Roadmap

2018-11-12 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 12/11/18 21:57, Fernando Frediani wrote: Totally agree with Luiz. That was the idea behind this proposal and you managed to even easier words. Alberto, the tiny subtarget you mentioned doesn't really seem to run well or stably for 18.06 on many of these devices regardless the flash size,

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt Roadmap

2018-11-12 Thread Fernando Frediani
Totally agree with Luiz. That was the idea behind this proposal and you managed to even easier words. Alberto, the tiny subtarget you mentioned doesn't really seem to run well or stably for 18.06 on many of these devices regardless the flash size, that's the main point. As mentioned there are

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt Roadmap

2018-11-12 Thread John Clark via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- > We are talking of embedded har

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt Roadmap

2018-11-12 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 12/11/18 21:20, Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca wrote: Hello, There are a significant amount of devices out there that has 4/32 specs. Even brand new ones. If there is stability issues with newer OpenWrt versions on those devices, we should rethink LEDE EOL. Maintenance burden is directly relate

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt Roadmap

2018-11-12 Thread Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
Hello, There are a significant amount of devices out there that has 4/32 specs. Even brand new ones. If there is stability issues with newer OpenWrt versions on those devices, we should rethink LEDE EOL. Maintenance burden is directly related to the amount of software to maintain. At the same tim

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt Roadmap

2018-11-08 Thread Fernando Frediani
Hello. I want to make a point about LEDE 17.01 branch. I have seen in the forums and also testing myself the many people are running LEDE 17.01 pretty stable and with good performance on older devices. As we know there are 18.06 builds for some of these devices as well but that have been reports

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt Roadmap

2018-11-05 Thread Robert Marko
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 23:23, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > On 11/05/2018 09:53 PM, Robert Marko wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 21:46, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> We had a discussion about the future OpenWrt Roadmap in July here: > >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwr

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt Roadmap

2018-11-05 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 11/05/2018 09:53 PM, Robert Marko wrote: > On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 21:46, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> We had a discussion about the future OpenWrt Roadmap in July here: >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-adm/2018-July/000849.html >> >> The outcome from my perspective is

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt Roadmap

2018-11-05 Thread Rosen Penev
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 12:45 PM Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > Hi all, > > We had a discussion about the future OpenWrt Roadmap in July here: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-adm/2018-July/000849.html > > The outcome from my perspective is the following. > > The next release would be done

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt Roadmap

2018-11-05 Thread Robert Marko
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 21:46, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > Hi all, > > We had a discussion about the future OpenWrt Roadmap in July here: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-adm/2018-July/000849.html > > The outcome from my perspective is the following. > > The next release would be done in