ping! :)
bye
as
On 07/20/2011 12:32 PM, Alessio Sangalli wrote:
> I see, for some reason there is a patch backported from 2.6.38
> (77f431561ef97dda1d6e9a96da8d342046fbdba0), I am not sure why. I will
> see if I can remove as it is cosmetic only, but let me ask:
>
> as this patch is specific f
On 07/20/2011 10:35 AM, Imre Kaloz wrote:
>>> You should remove everything that not related to your target.
>>
>> As that kernel is developed for the "SPEAr" family of products it's not
>> easy (or maybe not even possible) to remove the features of a single
>> SoC... At minimum it's a very tedious
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:15:30 +0200, Alessio Sangalli wrote:
On 07/20/2011 12:16 AM, Imre Kaloz wrote:
You should remove everything that not related to your target.
As that kernel is developed for the "SPEAr" family of products it's not
easy (or maybe not even possible) to remove the feature
On 07/20/2011 12:16 AM, Imre Kaloz wrote:
> You should remove everything that not related to your target.
As that kernel is developed for the "SPEAr" family of products it's not
easy (or maybe not even possible) to remove the features of a single
SoC... At minimum it's a very tedious job. Besides
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:37:56 +0200, Alessio Sangalli wrote:
On 07/19/2011 08:27 AM, D.S. Ljungmark wrote:
Other than wondering if it's upstreamed / upstream-able I'm really not
qualified to speak about things like this for OpenWRT, so I'll defer
this to someone else.
I get my kernel from:
On 07/19/2011 08:27 AM, D.S. Ljungmark wrote:
> Other than wondering if it's upstreamed / upstream-able I'm really not
> qualified to speak about things like this for OpenWRT, so I'll defer
> this to someone else.
I get my kernel from:
http://git.stlinux.com/?p=spear/linux-2.6.git;a=summary
the
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 08:14 -0700, Alessio Sangalli wrote:
> On 07/19/2011 01:55 AM, D.S. Ljungmark wrote:
>
> > I just opened it up and the first thing that met my eyes were :
>
> > -- really?
>
> Eheeh sorry that was not meant to be included in the patch :)
Oki
> I have *removed* that part
On 07/19/2011 01:55 AM, D.S. Ljungmark wrote:
> I just opened it up and the first thing that met my eyes were :
> -- really?
Eheeh sorry that was not meant to be included in the patch :)
I have *removed* that part from the patch. You can now download it again.
> I'm not qualified to speak fo
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 09:23 -0700, Alessio Sangalli wrote:
> On 07/16/2011 12:27 PM, Alessio Sangalli wrote:
>
> >> To better answer that question, you should put the patch somewhere,
> >> because of
> >> the mailing-list attachment size limitation. Then we can comment on your
> >> patch
> >>
On 07/16/2011 12:27 PM, Alessio Sangalli wrote:
>> To better answer that question, you should put the patch somewhere, because
>> of
>> the mailing-list attachment size limitation. Then we can comment on your
>> patch
>> and tell you whether it's acceptable or not.
>
> I'm sorry I forgot to p
On 07/16/2011 01:15 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hello Alessio,
>
> On Saturday 16 July 2011 08:01:33 Alessio Sangalli wrote:
>> I have a couple of questions about porting a board to OpenWRT:
>>
>> 1) do you think it can be accepted in the main line OpenWRT git? It
>> consists of a patch that is
Hello Alessio,
On Saturday 16 July 2011 08:01:33 Alessio Sangalli wrote:
> I have a couple of questions about porting a board to OpenWRT:
>
> 1) do you think it can be accepted in the main line OpenWRT git? It
> consists of a patch that is about 2MB when uncompressed as it adds all
> the platform
12 matches
Mail list logo
