Re: Question about qca8k dsa driver and path to follow

2021-09-11 Thread Ansuel Smith
> > > Is there any situation where the user would need to decide whether DSA or > > swconfig should be used, assuming both are working? A kmod may be > > Just a side note on this: > Having a user choice between drivers should not be a development goal by any > means here. > If it happens "by accide

RE: Question about qca8k dsa driver and path to follow

2021-09-11 Thread Adrian Schmutzler
> Is there any situation where the user would need to decide whether DSA or > swconfig should be used, assuming both are working? A kmod may be Just a side note on this: Having a user choice between drivers should not be a development goal by any means here. If it happens "by accident" due to othe

Re: Question about qca8k dsa driver and path to follow

2021-09-09 Thread Ansuel Smith
Il giorno gio 9 set 2021 alle ore 22:20 Ansuel Smith ha scritto: > > Il giorno gio 9 set 2021 alle ore 22:19 Rafał Miłecki > ha scritto: > > > > wt., 7 wrz 2021 o 18:53 Ansuel Smith napisał(a): > > > I currently have a pr open [1] to migrate ipq806x to > > > dsa driver > > > > Can you paste a mi

Re: Question about qca8k dsa driver and path to follow

2021-09-09 Thread Ansuel Smith
Il giorno gio 9 set 2021 alle ore 22:19 Rafał Miłecki ha scritto: > > wt., 7 wrz 2021 o 18:53 Ansuel Smith napisał(a): > > I currently have a pr open [1] to migrate ipq806x to > > dsa driver > > Can you paste a missing link, please? > > -- > Rafał Yes sorry i was referring to this. https://githu

Re: Question about qca8k dsa driver and path to follow

2021-09-09 Thread Rafał Miłecki
wt., 7 wrz 2021 o 18:53 Ansuel Smith napisał(a): > I currently have a pr open [1] to migrate ipq806x to > dsa driver Can you paste a missing link, please? -- Rafał ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.o

Re: Question about qca8k dsa driver and path to follow

2021-09-09 Thread Robert Marko
On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 16:40, Ansuel Smith wrote: > > > > > > > On 09/09/2021 01:04, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote: > > > > > I'm not really in a position to give advice, but -imho- unless those > > > other targets have at least proof-of-concept code for using qca8k on > > > their devices /working

Re: Question about qca8k dsa driver and path to follow

2021-09-09 Thread Ansuel Smith
> > > On 09/09/2021 01:04, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote: > > > I'm not really in a position to give advice, but -imho- unless those > > other targets have at least proof-of-concept code for using qca8k on > > their devices /working/ and an intention to migrate to DSA for these > > devices within r

Re: Question about qca8k dsa driver and path to follow

2021-09-09 Thread Matthew Hagan
On 09/09/2021 01:04, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote: > I'm not really in a position to give advice, but -imho- unless those > other targets have at least proof-of-concept code for using qca8k on > their devices /working/ and an intention to migrate to DSA for these > devices within reasonable tim

Re: Question about qca8k dsa driver and path to follow

2021-09-08 Thread Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
Hi On 2021-09-07, Ansuel Smith wrote: > I am writing this to ask for some help/direction on what path we > should follow for > the qca8k driver. I currently have a pr open [1] to migrate ipq806x to > dsa driver > (qca8k) but some other devs reported that the same switch is also used by > other >

Re: Question about qca8k dsa driver and path to follow

2021-09-08 Thread Matthew Hagan
On 07/09/2021 17:48, ansuelsmth at gmail.com (Ansuel Smith) wrote: > > Problem is that excluding ipq806x, not every device uses the qca8k > switch and including > that by default seems wrong. It was suggested to compile that as a > module (with optionally > the dsa subsistem as a kmod) so the dri