On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 03:58:34PM +0200, m...@adrianschmutzler.de wrote:
> > Thanks for the scrutiny! I do have some questions here: is the
> > VENDOR/MODEL supposed to match closer to a marketing-friendly/user-
> > friendly name, or a developer/low-level name?
>
> I typically prefer something th
> I'll spin up a new revision sooner or later, but I'm hoping I'll get some
> opinion
> on the RFC portion (cover letter / first ~3 patches) before doing that.
Yes, just wait for some comments on the actual content. :-)
> > I'd like a bit more detailed flashing instructions here. What you have r
Hi Adrian,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 2:13 PM wrote:
> just some formal stuff below.
Thanks! It's useful, especially where I'm still learning the OpenWRT
Makefile structures.
I'll spin up a new revision sooner or later, but I'm hoping I'll get
some opinion on the RFC portion (cover letter / first
Hi,
just some formal stuff below.
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Brian Norris
> Sent: Samstag, 18. Juli 2020 22:52
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Cc: Brian Norris
> Subject: [RFC PATCH 5/5] ipq40xx: add
