Hi!
On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 8:49 PM Rafaël Carré wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation.
>
> I had a look at the datasheet, also at the commits log of spi-mt7621.c.
> This also explains why I had to use dd bs=32 to get correct MTD reads.
>
> I am still a bit confused by the difference between chipse
Hi,
On 12/24/20 03:39, Chuanhong Guo wrote:
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 12:52 AM Rafaël Carré wrote:
diff --git
a/target/linux/ramips/patches-5.4/304-HACK-spi-mt7621-rt6855a-fix.patch
b/target/linux/ramips/patches-5.4/304-HACK-spi-mt7621-rt6855a-fix.patch
new file mode 100644
index 00..9
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Rafaël Carré
> Sent: Donnerstag, 24. Dezember 2020 09:33
> To: Chuanhong Guo
> Cc: OpenWrt Development List
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ramips: add RT68
Hi,
On 12/24/20 03:12, Chuanhong Guo wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 12:52 AM Rafaël Carré wrote:
TODO: the spi-mt7621 patches will break support for other targets
And please try your best to finish the TODOs before sending
them for review. Or send it as RFC instead.
No problem. Sh
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 12:52 AM Rafaël Carré wrote:
> diff --git
> a/target/linux/ramips/patches-5.4/304-HACK-spi-mt7621-rt6855a-fix.patch
> b/target/linux/ramips/patches-5.4/304-HACK-spi-mt7621-rt6855a-fix.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 00..972e969fc4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/targ
Hi!
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 10:12 AM Chuanhong Guo wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 12:52 AM Rafaël Carré wrote:
> >
> > TODO: the spi-mt7621 patches will break support for other targets
>
> Does that work on RT6855A at all? spi-mt7621 is a mediatek IP core.
> For a Ralink SoC I'm expe
Hi!
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 12:52 AM Rafaël Carré wrote:
>
> TODO: the spi-mt7621 patches will break support for other targets
Does that work on RT6855A at all? spi-mt7621 is a mediatek IP core.
For a Ralink SoC I'm expected to see a controller supported by
existing spi-ralink.c instead.
The GPL
