> -Original Message-
> From: Giovanni Giacobbi [mailto:giova...@giacobbi.net]
> Sent: Freitag, 9. Juli 2021 09:37
> To: Adrian Schmutzler ; 'Paul Spooren'
> ; 'Petr Štetiar' ; openwrt-
> de...@lists.openwrt.org
> Cc: 'Hannu Nyman'
>
On 04/07/2021 14:46, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
PKG_NAME:=json-c
PKG_VERSION:=0.12.1
-PKG_RELEASE:=3.1
+PKG_RELEASE:=3.2
I've never seen a non integer release, is there a special reason for this?
I've also used this as standard scheme for changes in stable branches. The
advantage is that y
> > PKG_NAME:=json-c
> > PKG_VERSION:=0.12.1
> > -PKG_RELEASE:=3.1
> > +PKG_RELEASE:=3.2
> I've never seen a non integer release, is there a special reason for this?
I've also used this as standard scheme for changes in stable branches. The
advantage is that you immediately see up to which ve
Hi,
> I've never seen a non integer release, is there a special reason for this?
I used to do that in the past when backporting master changes to
branches that didn't apply cleanly anymore.
In this case the package contents between master and release branches
deviated while keeping the same soft
On 7/1/21 9:51 AM, Petr Štetiar wrote:
Paul Spooren [2021-07-01 07:45:02]:
+++ b/package/libs/libjson-c/Makefile
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ include $(TOPDIR)/rules.mk
PKG_NAME:=json-c
PKG_VERSION:=0.12.1
-PKG_RELEASE:=3.1
+PKG_RELEASE:=3.2
I've never seen a non integer release, is there a special
Paul Spooren [2021-07-01 07:45:02]:
> > +++ b/package/libs/libjson-c/Makefile
> > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ include $(TOPDIR)/rules.mk
> > PKG_NAME:=json-c
> > PKG_VERSION:=0.12.1
> > -PKG_RELEASE:=3.1
> > +PKG_RELEASE:=3.2
>
> I've never seen a non integer release, is there a special reason for this?
On 7/1/21 3:09 AM, Petr Štetiar wrote:
From: Hannu Nyman
Mark uci, ubus, libubox, lua, libnl-tiny and libjson-c
as nonshared packages. This helps to keep coherent dependencies
if these ABI versioned packages are later updated.
Before this commit it is possible to get missing dependencies
in t
