Michal Novotny writes:
> Hi Bjørn,
>
> thanks a lot for your reply. Does those resolvers have support for
> DNS-Tap compiled in already?
Probably not. But the addtional packaging7build support should be much
easier to add than to implement dnstap support in dnsmasq.
> Also, does LuCI interfac
Hi Bjørn,
thanks a lot for your reply. Does those resolvers have support for
DNS-Tap compiled in already? Also, does LuCI interface have support for
configuring it already? I was unable to find it in the OpenWRT to
configure and I had to compile the resolvers with dnstap support and use
socat
Bjørn Mork writes:
> it would be nice to have unbound too.
Which we do have, of course. Don't know why, but I managed to miss it
the first time I looked.
So all the inportant resolvers are covered in OpenWrt. I don't think
you'll find many dnsmasq users among the set of people knowing what t
Michal Novotny writes:
> recently we've found a new project called DNS-Tap and it can be found on
> the DNSTap.info website [1]. There are several implementations available
> already - for Knot DNS, Unbound, BIND, CoreDNS and others - but they are
> not available on any stock router nor in any al
Hi,
> My question is about whether are you planning to introduce the DNS-Tap
> over TCP/IP to some version of the OpenWRT Router firmware. It's the emerging
> technology which might be very useful in the future.
you probably should direct these questions to the upstream DNSmasq project.
> You mig
Hello OpenWRT Team,
recently we've found a new project called DNS-Tap and it can be found on
the DNSTap.info website [1]. There are several implementations available
already - for Knot DNS, Unbound, BIND, CoreDNS and others - but they are
not available on any stock router nor in any alternative f