Hi Thibaut,
> On Nov 17, 2022, at 16:53, Thibaut wrote:
>
> Hi Sebastian,
>
>> Le 17 nov. 2022 à 16:19, Sebastian Moeller a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Thibaut,
>
> [...]
> Although I must confess that it certainly feels counter-intuitive that
> for ethernet (and FTTH) we suggest a higher over
Hi Sebastian,
> Le 17 nov. 2022 à 16:19, Sebastian Moeller a écrit :
>
> Hi Thibaut,
[...]
Although I must confess that it certainly feels counter-intuitive that for
ethernet (and FTTH) we suggest a higher overhead than e.g. VDSL2/cable
(which themselves run off an ethernet int
Hi Thibaut,
> On Nov 17, 2022, at 16:00, Thibaut wrote:
>
>
>
>> Le 17 nov. 2022 à 15:42, Sebastian Moeller a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Thibaut,
>>
>>> On Nov 17, 2022, at 15:22, Thibaut wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Sebastian,
>>>
Le 17 nov. 2022 à 10:50, Sebastian Moeller a écrit :
Hi T.
Hi Thibaut,
> On Nov 17, 2022, at 15:22, Thibaut wrote:
>
> Hi Sebastian,
>
>> Le 17 nov. 2022 à 10:50, Sebastian Moeller a écrit :
>>
>> Hi T.
>>
>>
>> so taking your proposa under consideration I canged the section that threw
>> you off course to read:
>>
>>
>> • Ethernet with Ove
Hi Sebastian,
> Le 17 nov. 2022 à 10:50, Sebastian Moeller a écrit :
>
> Hi T.
>
>
> so taking your proposa under consideration I canged the section that threw
> you off course to read:
>
>
> • Ethernet with Overhead: SQM can also account for the overhead imposed
> by VDSL2 links - a
Hi T.
so taking your proposa under consideration I canged the section that threw you
off course to read:
• Ethernet with Overhead: SQM can also account for the overhead imposed
by VDSL2 links - add 22 bytes of overhead (mpu 68). Cable Modems (DOCSIS) set
both up- and downstream overh
Hi T.
> On Nov 16, 2022, at 12:46, Thibaut wrote:
>
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
>> Le 16 nov. 2022 à 11:49, Sebastian Moeller a écrit :
>>
>> HI T.
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 16, 2022, at 11:22, Thibaut wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> A few questions for the CAKE experts here:
>>
Hi Sebastian,
Thanks for your reply.
> Le 16 nov. 2022 à 11:49, Sebastian Moeller a écrit :
>
> HI T.
>
>
>
>> On Nov 16, 2022, at 11:22, Thibaut wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> A few questions for the CAKE experts here:
>
> Quick note, this is not necessarily the best place to get advice o
HI T.
> On Nov 16, 2022, at 11:22, Thibaut wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> A few questions for the CAKE experts here:
Quick note, this is not necessarily the best place to get advice on
cake, both the cake mailing list and the OpenWrt forum tend to be directer
paths to the "bakers".
>
> I’m
Hi,
A few questions for the CAKE experts here:
I’m trying to untangle the information available in the openwrt wiki:
https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/traffic-shaping/sqm
https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/traffic-shaping/sqm-details
and for the latter especially the part here:
10 matches
Mail list logo