> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Nick
> Sent: Sonntag, 25. Oktober 2020 13:14
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: Re: Fate of kernel 4.19
>
> blocktrron helped me to fix the
blocktrron helped me to fix the jffs2 error! :)
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/3536
I don't require 4.19 kernel for ath79 anymore.
On 10/14/20 1:31 PM, Nick wrote:
>> the last time I tried with IPQ40xx a 5.4 kernel the switch was not working
>> correctly [1].
> There is a working soluti
> the last time I tried with IPQ40xx a 5.4 kernel the switch was not working
> correctly [1].
There is a working solution to revert a specific commit. It has
something to do with double tagging support.
Meanwhile just a "revert" does not work anymore so I created a patchfile:
https://gist.github.c
Hi again,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Stijn Tintel
> Sent: Samstag, 10. Oktober 2020 15:59
> To: Adrian Schmutzler ; openwrt-
> de...@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: Re: Fate of kernel 4.19
&g
On 10/9/20 2:19 PM, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
> Based on the response here, one might remove 4.19 even earlier then if nobody
> actually needs it anymore.
The 5.4 kernel breaks a lot of my devices. I still build master with
4.19 kernel.
There is this jffs2 error on ubiquity devices [0] and the la
On 9/10/2020 15:19, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
Opinions? Is anybody still using 4.19 at least occasionally?
+1 for removal
Stijn
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 at 14:22, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> in master, we currently support kernels 5.4 and 4.19.
>
> All targets build with 5.4 by default, so 4.19 is just there and can
> theoretically be used for regression testing (if it still works).
> However, since our last releas
On 2020-10-09 14:19, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
Hi all,
in master, we currently support kernels 5.4 and 4.19.
All targets build with 5.4 by default,
In other words: 4.19 is no longer required.
so 4.19 is just there and can
theoretically be used for regression testing
In that case, one can r
Hi all,
in master, we currently support kernels 5.4 and 4.19.
All targets build with 5.4 by default, so 4.19 is just there and can
theoretically be used for regression testing (if it still works).
However, since our last release used 4.14, 4.19 effectively is just an interim
step that has never
