On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, Alberto Bursi wrote:
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 21:58:23
From: Alberto Bursi
To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Subject: Re: Brokenness of the OpenWrt "packages" repo
On 26/04/21 16:01, Daniel Golle wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 03:28:22PM +0200, Enrico M
justified to me.
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:51:51
From: Bjørn Mork
To: Etienne Champetier
Cc: Rosen Penev ,
OpenWrt Development List
Subject: Re: Brokenness of the OpenWrt "packages" repo
Etienne Champetier writes:
Are you trying at the
Mork wrote:
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:51:51
From: Bjørn Mork
To: Etienne Champetier
Cc: Rosen Penev ,
OpenWrt Development List
Subject: Re: Brokenness of the OpenWrt "packages" repo
Etienne Champetier writes:
Are you trying at the same time to complain about not run-tested
u
On 26/04/21 07:51, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Etienne Champetier writes:
Are you trying at the same time to complain about not run-tested
updates and possibly having packages not up to date ?
No. The package was fine before the version was changed. In fact, it
was in much better shape before it w
On 25/04/21 15:51, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Rosen Penev writes:
Why was this sent here? dbus is in the packages feed.
Sorry, I assumed that was obvious. I'll explain
There is a continous push to move packages from the OpenWrt core repo to
the "packages" repo. This would have been fine if both t
Daniel Golle writes:
> Depending on half of the Freedesktop universe in order to initialize
> a network interface or receive an SMS in a very complicated way doesn't
> feel justified to me.
I have been very pleased with uqmi and umbim as alternatives for tiny
embedded devices, and I am hoping th
a network interface or receive an SMS in a very complicated way doesn't
feel justified to me.
>
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>
> > Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:51:51
> > From: Bjørn Mork
> > To: Etienne Champetier
> > Cc: Rosen Penev ,
> >
Sorry ... I don't mean to undervalue the efforts to build an alternate software
stack for that, like the very uqmi one.
But there's a whole lot of complexity underneath ...
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.op
n, 26 Apr 2021 07:51:51
From: Bjørn Mork
To: Etienne Champetier
Cc: Rosen Penev ,
OpenWrt Development List
Subject: Re: Brokenness of the OpenWrt "packages" repo
Etienne Champetier writes:
Are you trying at the same time to complain about not run-tested
updates and possibly havi
Etienne Champetier writes:
> Are you trying at the same time to complain about not run-tested
> updates and possibly having packages not up to date ?
No. The package was fine before the version was changed. In fact, it
was in much better shape before it was changed to a development version
by
Hi Bjørn,
Le dim. 25 avr. 2021 à 09:53, Bjørn Mork a écrit :
>
> Rosen Penev writes:
>
> > Why was this sent here? dbus is in the packages feed.
>
> Sorry, I assumed that was obvious. I'll explain
>
> There is a continous push to move packages from the OpenWrt core repo to
> the "packages" repo
Rosen Penev writes:
> Why was this sent here? dbus is in the packages feed.
Sorry, I assumed that was obvious. I'll explain
There is a continous push to move packages from the OpenWrt core repo to
the "packages" repo. This would have been fine if both these repos could
be trusted. Unfortunate
12 matches
Mail list logo
